Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 1, 2005 - Volume 30 - Issue 13 > Frequency and Clinical Predictors of Adverse Reactions to Ch...
You could be reading the full-text of this article now...
If you have access to this article through your institution, you can view this article in OvidSP.
Spine:
1 July 2005 - Volume 30 - Issue 13 - pp 1477-1484
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000167821.39373.c1
Randomized Trial

Frequency and Clinical Predictors of Adverse Reactions to Chiropractic Care in the UCLA Neck Pain Study

Hurwitz, Eric L. DC, PhD; Morgenstern, Hal PhD; Vassilaki, Maria MD, MPH; Chiang, Lu-May MS

Collapse Box

Abstract

Study Design. Randomized clinical trial.

Objectives. To document the types and frequencies of adverse reactions associated with the most common chiropractic treatments for neck pain, and to identify possible clinical predictors of adverse reactions to chiropractic treatment.

Summary of Background Data. Chiropractic care is frequently sought by patients for relief from neck pain; however, adverse reactions related to its primary modes of treatment have not been well examined.

Methods. A total of 336 patients with neck pain presenting to 4 southern California health care clinics were randomized in a balanced 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design to manipulation with or without heat, and with or without electrical muscle stimulation (EMS); and mobilization with or without heat and with or without EMS. Discomfort or unpleasant reactions from chiropractic care were self-assessed at 2 weeks after the randomization/baseline visit.

Results. Of the 280 participants (83%) who responded, 85 (30.4%) had 212 adverse symptoms as a result of chiropractic care. Increased neck pain or stiffness was the most common symptom, reported by 25% of the participants. Less common were headache and radiating pain. Patients randomized to manipulation were more likely than those randomized to mobilization to have an adverse symptom occurring within 24 hours of treatment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83, 2.49). Heat and EMS were only weakly associated with adverse symptoms (heat: OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.54, 1.62; EMS: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.63, 1.89). Moderate-to-severe neck disability at baseline was strongly associated with adverse neurologic symptoms (OR = 5.70, 95% CI = 1.49, 21.80).

Conclusions. Our results suggest that adverse reactions to chiropractic care for neck pain are common andthat despite somewhat imprecise estimation, adverse reactions appear more likely to follow cervical spine manipulation than mobilization. Given the possible higher risk of adverse reactions and lack of demonstrated effectiveness of manipulation over mobilization, chiropractors should consider a conservative approach for applying manipulation to their patients, especially those with severe neck pain.

© 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login




Help

Forgot Password?

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.