Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 1, 2004 - Volume 29 - Issue 7 > The IDET Procedure for Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain
You could be reading the full-text of this article now...
If you have access to this article through your institution, you can view this article in OvidSP.
Spine:
1 April 2004 - Volume 29 - Issue 7 - pp 752-756
doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000119403.11472.40
Case Series

The IDET Procedure for Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain

Davis, Timothy T. MD; Delamarter, Rick B. MD; Sra, Parveen MPH; Goldstein, Theodore B. MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Study Design. Retrospective study with independent evaluation of patient outcomes approximately 1 year post-intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET).

Objective. To assess functional status, symptoms, and subsequent treatments of patients treated with IDET.

Summary of Background Data. IDET was introduced as a procedure for discogenic pain. Several studies reported improvement in >70% of patients.

Methods. Seventeen physicians referred 60 patients. Each patient had a positive discogram and had been treated with IDET. Patients were contacted approximately 1 year post-IDET, answered a telephone interview, and completed a self-administered questionnaire. Overall patient satisfaction, pain, functional and work status, analgesic usage, and subsequent treatments were noted. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was generated to predict the percentage that would undergo lumbar surgery after IDET.

Results. Average age was 40 years (range 25-64 years) with 66% males and 34% females. Of the 44 patients who responded, 6 patients had a lumbar surgery within 1 year. Their outcomes were excluded from descriptive analysis; 97% continued to have back pain, 11 (29%) reported more pain post versus pre-IDET, 15 (39%) had less pain, and 11 (29%) reported no change; 11 (29%) reported using more pain medication post-IDET, 10 (26%) used the same, 12 (32%) used less, and 5 (13%) used none; 19 (50%) were dissatisfied with IDET, 14 (37%) were satisfied, and 5 (13%) were undecided; 20 (53%) would have the procedure again, 12 (31%) would not, and 6 (16%) were unsure. Most patients wore a brace >6 hours/day after surgery (duration 1-15 months). Sixteen (42%) were employed full-time pre-IDET and 11 (29%) were employed full-time post-IDET.

Conclusion. At 1-year post-IDET, half of patients were dissatisfied with their outcome. The percentage of patients on disability remained constant. The estimated proportion of patients undergoing fusion was predicted to be 15% at 1 year and 30% at 2 years.

© 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login




Help

Forgot Password?

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.