Spine

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 1, 2001 - Volume 26 - Issue 1 > Measurement of Thoracic and Lumbar Fracture Kyphosis: Evalua...
Spine:
1 January 2001 - Volume 26 - Issue 1 - pp 61-66
Diagnostics

Measurement of Thoracic and Lumbar Fracture Kyphosis: Evaluation of Intraobserver, Interobserver, and Technique Variability

Kuklo, Timothy R. MD; Polly, David W. Jr. MD; Owens, Brett D. MD; Zeidman, Seth M. MD; Chang, Audrey S. PhD; Klemme, William R. MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Study Design. Statistical analysis of various measurement techniques for thoracolumbar burst fracture kyphosis on lateral radiograph.

Objective. To determine the most reliable measurement technique.

Summary of Background Data. The treatment of thoracic and lumbar burst fractures involves many factors, including the degree of resultant kyphosis. Although various methods have been described, no study has directly compared these methods for reliability and reproducibility.

Methods. Fifty lateral radiographs of thoracic and lumbar burst fractures were randomly selected and measured on two separate occasions by three spine surgeons using five different measurement techniques. Radiograph quality, fracture type, and the center beam location were determined. Statistical analysis included analysis of variance for repeated measures and analysis of variance using a generalized linear model.

Results. Intraclass correlation coefficients were most consistent for Method 1 (rho = 0.83-0.94) followed by Method 4 (rho = 0.65-0.89) and Method 5 (rho = 0.73-0.85). Intraobserver agreement (% of repeated measures within 5° of the original measurement) ranged between 72% and 98% for all techniques for all three observers, with Method 1 showing the best agreement (84%-98%). Paired comparisons between observers varied considerably with interobserver reliability correlation coefficients ranging from 0.52 to 0.93. Method 1 showed the highest interobserver reliability coefficient (0.81, range 0.71-0.93) followed by Method 5 (0.71, range 0.68-0.75). Method 1 also had the highest percentage of agreement within categories (90% within 5°).

Conclusions. Method 1 (measuring from the superior endplate of the vertebral body one level above the injured vertebral body to the inferior endplate of the vertebral body one level below) showed the best intraobserver and interobserver reliability overall.

© 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.