Spine

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 1, 2000 - Volume 25 - Issue 5 > Surgical and Nonsurgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosi...
Spine:
1 March 2000 - Volume 25 - Issue 5 - pp 556-562
Clinical Case Study

Surgical and Nonsurgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Four-Year Outcomes From the Maine Lumbar Spine Study

Atlas, Steven J. MD, MPH; Keller, Robert B. MD; Robson, Deborah BS; Deyo, Richard A. MD, MPH; Singer, Daniel E. MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Study Design. A prospective cohort study of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis recruited from the practices of orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons throughout Maine.

Objective. To assess 4-year outcomes for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated surgically or nonsurgically.

Summary of Background Data. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis has increased dramatically despite the lack of randomized trials comparing surgical with nonsurgical treatments. Long-term evaluation of surgical series has documented deterioration in initial symptomatic improvement, but few studies have compared long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical treatment.

Methods. Eligible, consenting patients had baseline interviews with mailed follow-up questionnaires at 3, 6, and 12 months, then annually thereafter. Clinical data were obtained at baseline from a physician questionnaire. Outcomes included patient-reported symptoms of leg and back pain, functional status, and satisfaction.

Results. Of 148 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis initially enrolled, 4-year outcomes were available on 119 patients (80.4%): 67 of 81 (83%) treated surgically and 52 of 67 (78%) treated nonsurgically. The surgically treated patients had more severe symptoms and worse functional status at baseline and better outcomes at 4-year evaluation than the nonsurgically treated patients. After 4 years, 70% of the surgically treated and 52% of the nonsurgically treated patients reported that their predominant symptom, either leg or back pain, was better (P = 0.05). Satisfaction of patients with their current state at 4 years was reported by 63% of the surgically treated and 42% of the nonsurgically treated patients (P = 0.04). Surgical treatment remained a significant determinant of 4-year satisfaction, even after adjustment for other independent predictors (P = 0.001). For the nonsurgically treated patients, there was no significant change in outcomes over 4 years, whereas the initial improvement seen in the surgically treated patients modestly decreased over the subsequent 4 years.

Conclusions. For the patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis, surgical treatment was associated with greater improvement in patient-reported outcomes than nonsurgical treatment at 4-year evaluation, even after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics among treatment groups. The relative benefit of surgery declined over time but remained superior to nonsurgical treatment. Outcomes for the nonsurgically treated patients improved modestly and remained stable over 4 years. Determining whether outcomes continue to converge will require longer-term evaluation.

Lumbar spinal stenosis is an increasingly recognized cause of low back pain and radiculopathy in elderly patients. Since 1979, dramatic increases in surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis have been documented in the United States Medicare population. 2 Among regions of the country, rates of lumbar spine procedures, including fusion and nonfusion procedures for spinal stenosis, vary by as much as 50%. 19

Although surgery is an accepted treatment for spinal stenosis, no randomized studies have compared outcomes for patients treated surgically or nonsurgically. Indeed, few studies have examined the natural history of nonsurgically treated spinal stenosis. 3 As a result substantial uncertainty exists regarding the indications for surgery in spinal stenosis, the long-term outcomes for patients with spinal stenosis, and the factors associated with improved outcome. 21

The current authors have previously reported 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who were treated prospectively in community-based practices. 1 Because the treatment plan was determined by the physician and patient in the usual clinical setting, on the average, patients treated surgically had more severe findings on imaging studies and worse symptoms at baseline than patients treated nonsurgically. Even after control for baseline differences, surgically treated patients reported significantly better short-term outcomes than nonsurgically treated patients. Given that spinal stenosis usually results from degenerative changes thought to be progressive, 4 and that previous studies show deterioration in outcomes over time in surgically treated patients, 7,10-12,20 the current study assessed 4-year outcomes in a cohort of patients treated either surgically or nonsurgically.

© 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.