Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections In The News Blog For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 1, 1999 - Volume 24 - Issue 17 > The Efficacy of Head Immobilization Techniques During Simula...
Spine:
Techniques

The Efficacy of Head Immobilization Techniques During Simulated Vehicle Motion

Perry, Stephen D. MSc, PhD Candidate*; McLellan, Barry MD, FRCPC†; McIlroy, William E. PhD*; Maki, Brian E. PhD*; Schwartz, Michael MD, FRCSC‡; Fernie, Geoff R. PhD*

Collapse Box

Abstract

Study Design. Laboratory experiment.

Objective. To compare the efficacy of different head immobilization techniques during motion simulating ambulance transport.

Background. A significant number of neurologic injuries associated with cervical spine fractures arise or are aggravated during emergency extrication or patient transport. Previous studies have not addressed the effect of head immobilization on the passive motion that could occur across the neck during transport.

Methods. Three different head-immobilization methods were compared in six healthy young adults by using a computer-controlled moving platform to simulate the swaying and jarring movements that can occur during ambulance transport. In all tests, the trunk was secured by means of a commonly used “criss-cross” strapping technique. Efficacy of head immobilization was evaluated using measures of head motion and neck rotation.

Results. None of the three immobilization techniques was successful in eliminating head motion or neck rotation. Movement of the trunk contributed substantially to the lateral bending that occurred across the neck. A new product involving the placement of wedges underneath the head provided some small, but statistically significant improvements in fixation of the head to the fracture board; however, there was no improvement in terms of the relative motion occurring across the neck.

Conclusions. Somewhat improved fixation of the head to the fracture board can be achieved by placing wedges under the head; however, the benefits of any fixation method, in terms of cervical spine immobilization, are likely to be limited unless the motion of the trunk is also controlled effectively. Future research and development should address techniques to better control head and trunk motion.

© 1999 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Follow Us!

  

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.