Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 01, 2014 - Volume 39 - Issue 19 > Surgeon Specialty and Outcomes After Elective Spine Surgery
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000489

Surgeon Specialty and Outcomes After Elective Spine Surgery

Seicean, Andreea MPH, PhD*,†; Alan, Nima BS*; Seicean, Sinziana MD, PhD, MPH‡,§; Neuhauser, Duncan PhD; Benzel, Edward C. MD¶,‖; Weil, Robert J. MD¶,**,††

Supplemental Author Material
Collapse Box


Study Design. Retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected clinical data.

Objective. To compare outcomes of elective spine fusion and laminectomy when performed by neurological and orthopedic surgeons.

Summary of Background Data. The relationship between primary specialty training and outcome of spinal surgery is unknown.

Methods. We analyzed the 2006 to 2012 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database of 50,361 patients, 33,235 (66%) of which were operated on by a neurosurgeon. We eliminated all differences in preoperative and intraoperative risk factors between surgical specialties by matching 17,126 patients who underwent orthopedic surgery (OS) to 17,126 patients who underwent neurosurgery (NS) on propensity scores. Regular and conditional logistic regressions were used to predict adverse postoperative outcomes in the full sample and matched sample, respectively. The effect of perioperative transfusion on outcomes was further assessed in the matched sample.

Results. Diagnosis and procedure were the only factors that were found to be significantly different between surgical subspecialties in the full sample. We found that compared with patients who underwent NS, patients who underwent OS were more than twice as likely to experience prolonged length of stay (LOS) (odds ratio: 2.6, 95% confidence interval: 2.4–2.8), and significantly more likely to receive a transfusion perioperatively, have complications, and to require discharge with continued care. After matching, patients who underwent OS continued to have slightly higher odds for prolonged LOS, and twice the odds for receiving perioperative transfusion compared with patients who underwent NS. Taking into account perioperative transfusion did not eliminate the difference in LOS between patients who underwent OS and those who underwent NS.

Conclusion. Patients operated on by OS have twice the odds for undergoing perioperative transfusion and slightly increased odds for prolonged LOS. Other differences between surgical specialties in 30-day postoperative outcomes were minimal. Analysis of a large, multi-institutional sample of prospectively collected clinical data suggests that surgeon specialty has limited influence on short-term outcomes after elective spine surgery.

Level of Evidence: 3

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Follow Us!



Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.