Skip Navigation LinksHome > August 01, 2014 - Volume 39 - Issue 17 > Cost Analysis of Incidental Durotomy in Spine Surgery
Spine:
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000425
Epidemiology

Cost Analysis of Incidental Durotomy in Spine Surgery

Nandyala, Sreeharsha V. BA; Elboghdady, Islam M.; Marquez-Lara, Alejandro MD; Noureldin, Mohamed N. B. MD; Sankaranarayanan, Sriram MD; Singh, Kern MD

Blog
Collapse Box

Abstract

Study Design. Retrospective database analysis.

Objective. To characterize the consequences of an incidental durotomy with regard to perioperative complications and total hospital costs.

Summary of Background Data. There is a paucity of data regarding how an incidental durotomy and its associated complications may relate to total hospital costs.

Methods. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried from 2008 to 2011. Patients who underwent cervical or lumbar decompression and/or fusion procedures were identified, stratified by approach, and separated into cohorts based on a documented intraoperative incidental durotomy. Patient demographics, comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index), length of hospital stay, perioperative outcomes, and costs were assessed. Analysis of covariance and multivariate linear regression were used to assess the adjusted mean costs of hospitalization as a function of durotomy.

Results. The incidental durotomy rate in cervical and lumbar spine surgery is 0.4% and 2.9%, respectively. Patients with an incidental durotomy incurred a longer hospitalization and a greater incidence of perioperative complications including hematoma and neurological injury (P < 0.001). Regression analysis demonstrated that a cervical durotomy and its postoperative sequelae contributed an additional adjusted $7638 (95% confidence interval, 6489–8787; P < 0.001) to the total hospital costs. Similarly, lumbar durotomy contributed an additional adjusted $2412 (95% confidence interval, 1920–2902; P < 0.001) to the total hospital costs. The approach-specific procedural groups demonstrated similar discrepancies in the mean total hospital costs as a function of durotomy.

Conclusion. This analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database demonstrates that incidental durotomies increase hospital resource utilization and costs. In addition, it seems that a cervical durotomy and its associated complications carry a greater financial burden than a lumbar durotomy. Further studies are warranted to investigate the long-term financial implications of incidental durotomies in spine surgery and to reduce the costs associated with this complication.

Level of Evidence: 3

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Follow Us!

  

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.