Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 15, 2014 - Volume 39 - Issue 16 > Detrusor Overactivity in Patients With Cauda Equina Syndrome
Spine:
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000410
Diagnostics

Detrusor Overactivity in Patients With Cauda Equina Syndrome

Kim, Seo-Young MD*; Kwon, Hee Chung MD*; Hyun, Jung Keun MD, PhD*,†,‡

SLIDE
Collapse Box

Abstract

Study Design. Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Objective. To delineate the neurogenic bladder type in patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES) and to suggest, in light of the clinical, radiological, and electrophysiological findings, a possible cause of bladder dysfunction.

Summary of Background Data. Many patients with CES experience bladder dysfunction, although the type of neurogenic bladder is quite variable in the clinical setting. Bladder dysfunction in patients with CES is usually areflexic or acontractile detrusor. However, detrusor overactivity (DOA) also reported the cases that cannot be explained by pure root injuries in the cauda equina region.

Methods. Patients with CES with neurogenic bladder were studied, all of whom (n = 61; mean age ± SD, 48.0 ± 15.9 yr) underwent urodynamic analysis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electrophysiology. According to the urodynamic findings, the neurogenic bladder was classified into 2 types: DOA and detrusor underactivity or acontractility. The highest level of injury (HLI) or level of injury was determined and analyzed on the basis of the clinical-urodynamic and electrophysiological findings, respectively.

Results. Twenty patients with CES (32.8%) showed DOA; in most of them (85.0%, 17/20 patients), the HLI on electrophysiological assessment was L2 or above. Forty-one patients with CES showed detrusor underactivity or acontractility; and most of the patients with CES whose HLI was L3 or below showed detrusor underactivity or acontractility (91.2%, 31/34 patients). None of the HLI or level of injury from the clinical or magnetic resonance imaging findings correlated with neurogenic bladder type. We also found that urodynamic findings including maximal detrusor pressure and bladder capacity was partially correlated with the HLI on electrophysiological assessment (r2 = 0.244, P < 0.001 and r2 = 0.330; P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion. DOA was seen most often in patients with CES whose HLI was L2 or above, and might be associated with combined conus medullaris lesion. Electrophysiology might be the most useful assessment tool for prediction of neurogenic bladder type in patients with CES.

Level of Evidence: 4

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Follow Us!

  

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.