Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 15, 2014 - Volume 39 - Issue 6 > Influence of Screw Augmentation in Posterior Dynamic and Rig...
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000198

Influence of Screw Augmentation in Posterior Dynamic and Rigid Stabilization Systems in Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebrae: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study

Sven, Hoppe MD*; Yannick, Loosli; Daniel, Baumgartner; Paul, Heini MD§; Lorin, Benneker MD*

Collapse Box


Study Design. Biomechanical cadaveric study.

Objective. To determine whether augmentation positively influence screw stability or not.

Summary of Background Data. Implantation of pedicle screws is a common procedure in spine surgery to provide an anchorage of posterior internal fixation into vertebrae. Screw performance is highly correlated to bone quality. Therefore, polymeric cement is often injected through specifically designed perforated pedicle screws into osteoporotic bone to potentially enhance screw stability.

Methods. Caudocephalic dynamic loading was applied as quasi-physiological alternative to classical pull-out tests on 16 screws implanted in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae and 20 screws in nonosteoporotic specimen. Load was applied using 2 different configurations simulating standard and dynamic posterior stabilization devices. Screw performance was quantified by measurement of screwhead displacement during the loading cycles. To reduce the impact of bone quality and morphology, screw performance was compared for each vertebra and averaged afterward.

Results. All screws (with or without cement) implanted in osteoporotic vertebrae showed lower performances than the ones implanted into nonosteoporotic specimen. Augmentation was negligible for screws implanted into nonosteoporotic specimen, whereas in osteoporotic vertebrae pedicle screw stability was significantly increased. For dynamic posterior stabilization system an increase of screwhead displacement was observed in comparison with standard fixation devices in both setups.

Conclusion. Augmentation enhances screw performance in patients with poor bone stock, whereas no difference is observed for patients without osteoporosis. Furthermore, dynamic stabilization systems have the possibility to fail when implanted in osteoporotic bone.

Level of Evidence: N/A

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Follow Us!



Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.