Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 01, 2014 - Volume 39 - Issue 5 > Complications After Lumbar Spine Surgery Between Teaching an...
Spine:
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000149
Health Services Research

Complications After Lumbar Spine Surgery Between Teaching and Nonteaching Hospitals

Nandyala, Sreeharsha V. BA; Marquez-Lara, Alejandro MD; Fineberg, Steven J. MD; Hassanzadeh, Hamid MD; Singh, Kern MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Study Design. Retrospective national database analysis.

Objective. A national population-based database was analyzed to characterize the perioperative complications of lumbar spine procedures performed at teaching and nonteaching hospitals.

Summary of Background Data. Perception biases exist regarding the complications of lumbar spine surgery based upon the hospital teaching environment.

Methods. Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 2002–2011. Patients undergoing an anterior lumbar interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, anterior/posterior lumbar fusion, or lumbar decompression to treat lumbar degenerative pathology were identified and separated into cohorts based upon the teaching status of the hospital. Patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, length of stay, complications, mortality, and costs were assessed.

Results. A total of 658,616 lumbar procedures were identified from 2002–2011, of which 367,875 (55.9%) were performed at teaching hospitals. An older patient population comprised the teaching hospital cohort and demonstrated a greater comorbidity burden than the nonteaching group (Charlson Comorbidity Index 2.90 vs. 2.55; P < 0.001). In addition, the teaching hospital cohort was associated with a significantly greater number of multilevel fusion cases (P < 0.001) and incurred a greater mean length of stay (3.7 vs. 3.0 d; P < 0.001). Patients treated at teaching hospitals demonstrated a significantly greater incidence of postoperative pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, infection, and neurological complications than the nonteaching cohort (P < 0.001). Overall, there were no significant differences in the mean total hospital costs or mortality between the hospital cohorts. Regression analysis demonstrated that teaching status was not a significant predictor of mortality (OR, 1.02; confidence interval 0.8–1.2; P = 0.8).

Conclusion. Patients treated in teaching hospitals for lumbar spine surgery incurred a longer hospitalization and a greater incidence of postoperative complications including pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, infection, and neurological events. These findings may be explained by an increased complexity of procedures performed at teaching hospitals along with an older and a more comorbid patient population. Despite these differences, the teaching status was not a significant predictor of in-hospital mortality after a lumbar spine surgery.

Level of Evidence: 3

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Follow Us!

  

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.