Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections In The News Blog For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 15, 2014 - Volume 39 - Issue 2 > Validity and Reliability of the French Version of the STarT...
Spine:
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000062
Health Services Research

Validity and Reliability of the French Version of the STarT Back Screening Tool for Patients With Low Back Pain

Bruyère, Olivier PhD*,†,‡; Demoulin, Maryline MPH*; Beaudart, Charlotte MPH*,‡; Hill, Jonathan C. MD§; Maquet, Didier PhD; Genevay, Stéphane PhD; Mahieu, Geneviève MD; Reginster, Jean-Yves MD*,‡; Crielaard, Jean-Michel MD; Demoulin, Christophe PhD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Study Design. Observational prospective study.

Objective. Our objective was to assess the reliability and validity of the French version of the Keele STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST).

Summary of Background Data. The SBST is a recently validated tool developed to identify subgroups of patients with low back pain (LBP) to guide early secondary prevention in primary care.

Methods. Outpatients 18 years or older with LBP, attending a rehabilitation center, a back school, a private physiotherapy unit, or a fitness center were included. Patients were assessed through the SBST, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire, Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 questionnaire, and a pain visual analogue scale. Test-retest reliability was assessed with Kappa score or the intraclass correlation coefficient, internal consistency of the Psychological subscale with the Cronbach α coefficient, construct validity with the Spearman correlation coefficient, and floor and ceiling effects by percentage frequency of lowest or highest possible score achieved by respondents.

Results. One hundred eight patients with LBP were included. The test-retest reliability of the SBST total score was excellent with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.90 (0.81–0.95). The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.73 showing a good internal consistency for the Psychological subscale. High Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.74 between SBST and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and 0.74 between the SBST and Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire were observed. As expected, low-to-moderate correlations were observed between the SBST total score and some dissimilar measures of the Short-Form 36. The lowest possible SBST score was observed for 8 patients (7.4%), whereas only 3 patients (2.8%) had the highest possible SBST score.

Conclusion. The French version of the SBST is a reliable and valid questionnaire consistent with the original English version. Therefore, this new version may help French-speaking clinicians and scientists to stratify patients with LBP.

Level of Evidence: 2

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Follow Us!

  

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.