Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 01, 2014 - Volume 39 - Issue 1 > Complications of Spinal Fusion With Utilization of Bone Morp...
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000004
Literature Review

Complications of Spinal Fusion With Utilization of Bone Morphogenetic Protein: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Singh, Kern MD*; Ahmadinia, Kasra MD*; Park, Daniel K. MD; Nandyala, Sreeharsha V. BA*; Marquez-Lara, Alejandro MD*; Patel, Alpesh A. MD, FACS; Fineberg, Steven J. MD*

Collapse Box


Study Design. Systematic review.

Objective. A systematic review was performed to identify the types of complications and complication rates associated with the use of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) in both anterior and posterior cervical and lumbar spine surgery.

Summary of Background Data. There has been an increase in BMP use in various clinical situations typically in an “off-label” fashion. Associated with its use, however, have been reports of various complications.

Methods. A MEDLINE search was conducted. All articles involving complications after spine surgery in patients receiving BMP were included. Articles were excluded on the basis of the following criteria: Non-English manuscripts and nonhuman subjects. A total of 29 articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were used in the analysis. For each complication identified, the incidence was calculated by pooling the subjects from the studies that reported the complication. χ2 tests were used to compare the incidence rates between those that had received BMP and the control groups.

Results. Of the 29 articles included, 7 reported complication rates in anterior cervical fusions, 3 in posterior cervical fusions, 4 in anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIF), 9 in posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (PLIF/TLIF), and 6 in posterolateral lumbar fusions. Individual complication rates when BMP was used was in the range from 0.66% to 20.1% in anterior cervical fusions, 3.5% to 14.6% in posterior cervical fusions, 2.0% to 7.3% in ALIFs, 1.5% to 21.8% in PLIF/TLIFs, and 1.4% to 8.2% in posterolateral lumbar fusions. Pseudarthrosis rates were statistically significantly lower with the utilization of BMP in all procedures except for PLIF/TLIFs, which only approached significance (P = 0.07). The only individual complication that was statistically significantly greater with BMP utilization was retrograde ejaculation in ALIFs (7.3 vs. 2.3%; P = 0.03). The rate of dysphagia/swelling in anterior cervical fusions was greater with BMP (20.1 vs. 15.6%), however this only approached statistical significance (P = 0.07).

Conclusion. The body of literature reports complication rates with BMP ranging from 0.66% to 21.8%. However, the only statistically significant adverse complication rate was retrograde ejaculation in the ALIF population (7.3%). Despite the increased awareness of complications associated with BMP, complication rates remain spine site specific and low. Thorough patient education should be done with the physician to make an informative use regarding BMP utilization in spinal surgery.

Level of Evidence: 3

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Follow Us!



Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.