Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 01, 2012 - Volume 37 - Issue 21 > Who Should Have Surgery for Spinal Stenosis? Treatment Effec...
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182634b04
Randomized Trial

Who Should Have Surgery for Spinal Stenosis? Treatment Effect Predictors in SPORT

Pearson, Adam MD, MS*; Lurie, Jon MD, MS; Tosteson, Tor ScD; Zhao, Wenyan MS*; Abdu, William MD, MS*; Weinstein, James N. DO, MS*

Collapse Box


Study Design. Combined prospective randomized controlled trial and observational cohort study of spinal stenosis (SpS) with an as-treated analysis.

Objective. To determine modifiers of the treatment effect (TE) of surgery (the difference between surgical and nonoperative outcomes) for SpS using subgroup analysis.

Summary of Background Data. The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial demonstrated a positive surgical TE for SpS at the group level. However, individual characteristics may affect TE. No previous studies have evaluated TE modifiers in SpS.

Methods. SpS patients were treated with either surgery (n = 419) or nonoperative care (n = 235) and were analyzed according to treatment received. Fifty-three baseline variables were used to define subgroups for calculating the time-weighted average TE for the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) over 4 years (TE = ΔODIsurgery – ΔODInonoperative). Variables with significant subgroup × treatment interactions (P < 0.05) were simultaneously entered into a multivariate model to select independent TE predictors.

Results. Other than smokers, all analyzed subgroups including at least 50 patients improved significantly more with surgery than with nonoperative treatment (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated: baseline ODI ≤ 56 (TE −15.0 vs. −4.4, ODI > 56, P < 0.001), not smoking (TE −11.7 vs. −1.6 smokers, P < 0.001), neuroforaminal stenosis (TE −14.2 vs. −8.7 no neuroforaminal stenosis, P = 0.002), predominant leg pain (TE −11.5 vs. −7.3 predominant back pain, P = 0.035), not lifting at work (TE −12.5 vs. −0.5 lifting at work, P = 0.017), and the presence of a neurological deficit (TE −13.3 vs. −7.2 no neurological deficit, P < 0.001) were associated with greater TE.

Conclusion. With the exception of smokers, patients who met strict inclusion criteria improved more with surgery than with nonoperative treatment, regardless of other specific characteristics. However, TE varied significantly across certain subgroups, and these data can be used to individualize shared decision making discussions about likely outcomes. Smoking cessation should be considered before surgery for SpS.

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Follow Us!



Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.