You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Index and Adjacent Level Kinematics After Cervical Disc Replacement and Anterior Fusion: In Vivo Quantitative Radiographic Analysis

Park, Daniel K. MD; Lin, Eric L. MD; Phillips, Frank M. MD

Spine:
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181df10fc
Cervical Spine
Abstract

Study Design. Prospective, randomized trial.

Objective. To assess the in vivo kinematics of the cervical spine after cervical fusion and arthroplasty.

Summary of Background Data. Compared with spinal fusion, disc replacement may impede the development of adjacent segment disease. To achieve this goal, any arthroplasty device should achieve desired spinal alignment while maintaining physiologic spinal motion at both the operated and surrounding motion segments.

Methods. As part of a multicenter, prospective, randomized Food and Drug Administration IDE clinical evaluation of the porous coated motion artificial cervical disc, patients underwent either a single-level total disc replacement (TDR; 272 patients) or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF; 182 patients) for treatment of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Neutral, flexion, and extension radiographs of the cervical spine obtained before surgery, and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were assessed. Quantitative assessments and comparisons of motion patterns were produced using validated computer-assisted methods. Kinematic parameters, including segmental rotation, translation, center of rotation (COR), disc height, and disc angle were calculated.

Results. Cervical TDR preserved angular motion at the operated level, although the range was reduced from 8.0° before surgery to 6.2° at 12 months after surgery (P < 0.001). Significantly after TDR, adjacent-level angular motion was unchanged. In patients treated with fusion, angular motion at the superior adjacent level increased from 9.6° before surgery to 11.0° (P = 0.003) at 12 months, with a trend toward increased postoperative translation (P = 0.07). For the TDR group, the horizontal COR averaged 0.8 mm posterior to the disc center before surgery and 0.2 mm anterior to the center at 12 months after TDR (P < 0.001), and the vertical COR averaged 2.5 mm below the endplate before surgery and 4.0 mm below at 12 months (P = 0.001). COR at the adjacent levels was unaltered by fusion or TDR. Lordotic alignment and disc height at the index level increased after intervention in both groups.

Conclusion. TDR with the porous coated motion implant is able to restore and maintain lordotic alignment and disc height and maintain angular motion while allowing for similar translation to that seen before surgery. In contrast, after ACDF, the superior adjacent level developed increased angular motion compared with preoperative range of motion. This study provides in vivo data regarding the functioning of TDR and ACDF and their impact on adjacent-level kinematics.

In Brief

Compared with fusion, disc replacement has been suggested to decrease the development of adjacent-segment degeneration. Using validated computerized analysis of pre- and postoperative radiographs, it was found that the porous coated motion TDR is able to maintain motion and restore lordosis at the treated level while having no discernable effect on adjacent-level motion patterns.

Author Information

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Frank M. Phillips, MD, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison Street, Chicago, II 60612; E-mail: Frank.phillips@rushortho.com

Acknowledgment date: October 23, 2009. First revision date: January 1, 2010. Second revision date: March 6, 2010. Acceptance date: March 12, 2010.

The device(s)/drug(s) that is/are the subject of this manuscript is/are being evaluated as part of an ongoing FDA-approved investigational protocol (IDE) or corresponding national protocol.

No funds were received in support of this work. One or more of the author(s) has/have received or will receive benefits for personal or professional use from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript: e.g., royalties, stocks, stock options, decision-making position.

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.