Study Design. Prospective randomized study of patients undergoing lumbar arthrodesis.
Objectives. To quantify MRI changes of the erector spinae following lumbar surgery through a posterior approach and the possible protection of these muscles during surgery by the use of cholinergic blockade.
Summary of Background Data. It has been shown that lumbar spine surgery through a posterior approach can induce iatrogenic lesions in the erector spinae. We have shown in a previous study that histologic changes on muscular biopsy performed in the multifidus at the end of the surgical procedure were not modified by the use of cholinergic blockade during surgery.
Methods. Twenty patients scheduled to undergo pedicle-screw enhanced L4–L5 arthrodesis were enrolled in this study. Ten patients received curare during anesthesia and 10 patients did not. MRI was obtained the day before the operation and at 6 months of follow-up on the same MR scanner. T1-weighted images were obtained in the axial plane. The 2 slices immediately proximal and distal to the pedicle screw construct on the postoperative MRI were selected. The corresponding slices were selected on the preoperative MRI. Each erector spinae on the 4 slices was surrounded using a mouse-guided tool. The contractile component of the cross-sectional area (CCSA) was calculated from the number of pixels surrounded and the signal intensity of each pixel.
Results. There was only slight changes in the erector spinae CCSA proximal to a posterior lumbar arthrodesis. Erector spinae CCSA decreased by 27% distal to the arthrodesis. Curare showed no efficacy in preventing muscle damage.
Conclusions. Erector spinae muscle alterations mainly occur distal to posterior lumbar surgical procedures.
We used an MRI technique for evaluating erector spinae following lumbar surgery. Only slight postoperative changes were observed in the contractile component cross-sectional area of the muscles proximal to the arthrodesis, while the area was reduced by 27% distal to the procedure. Curare showed no efficacy in preventing muscle damage.
From the University Hospital of Bordeaux, Spinal Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bordeaux, France.
Acknowledgment date: July 27, 2006. Acceptance date: October 9, 2006.
The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s).
No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Wafa Skalli, PhD, ENSAM Biomechanics Laboratory of Paris, Ecole Nationale des Arts et Métiers, 75013 Paris, France; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org