You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Early C Sequestration Rate Changes for Reclaimed Minesoils

Chaudhuri, Sriroop1; Pena-Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M.1; McDonald, Louis M.1; Skousen, Jeffrey1; Sperow, Mark2

Soil Science:
doi: 10.1097/SS.0b013e318254494d
Technical Article
Abstract

Abstract: Reclaimed minesoils have well-defined ages (time since reclamation), making them suitable for studying temporal changes in terrestrial carbon sequestration. The objective of this research was to assess the effect of time since reclamation on soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration and related soil properties such as texture, bulk density, and cation exchange capacity in three West Virginia minesoils along a chronosequence. The minesoils’ surface 750 Mg ha−1 (0–6 cm) was sampled at 1, 4, and 21 years and again at 2, 5, and 22 years postreclamation, giving a total of 6 site-years of information. Average SOC stocks (Mg C ha−1) were highest in the oldest minesoils. Soil bulk density was highest and unrelated to SOC concentration in the youngest minesoil, reflecting recent compressive reclamation techniques. The cation exchange capacity of older minesoils was influenced more by SOC than by clay, whereas the opposite was observed in younger minesoils. The relationship of SOC stock to time since reclamation was best described by a logarithmic diminishing returns model. Short-term (1 year) SOC sequestration rates (Mg C ha−1 y−1) were not appropriate to describing the change in SOC sequestration rate occurring along the chronosequence. When taken as the first derivative of the diminishing returns model, long-term SOC sequestration rates were shown to decline precipitously (80%) in the first 5 years after reclamation. The model predicts that the surface 750 Mg ha−1 of minesoil will contain about 13.3 Mg SOC ha−1 at 50 years after reclamation. About 75% of that SOC storage is predicted to be achieved in the first decade after reclamation.

Author Information

1Division of Plant and Soil Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.

2Division of Resource Management, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.

Address for correspondence: Dr. Eugenia M. Pena-Yewtukhiw, 1104 Agricultural Sciences Building, Division of Plant & Soil Sciences, 1090 Agricultural Sciences Bldg, P.O. Box 6108, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV26506, USA. E-mail: eugenia.pena-yewtukhiw@mail.wvu.edu

Received December 29, 2011.

Accepted for publication March 6, 2012.

Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest: The first author was supported, in part, by the Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership; Department of Energy-National Energy Technology Laboratory Cooperative Agreement DE-FC26-05NT42589.

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.