Neutrophils—A Key Component of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
Schofield, Zoe Victoria*; Woodruff, Trent Martin†; Halai, Reena*; Wu, Mike Chia-Lun†; Cooper, Matthew Allister*
*Institute for Molecular Bioscience and †School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Received 25 Jun 2013; first review completed 08 Jul 2013; accepted in final form 19 Aug 2013
Address reprint requests to Matthew Allister Cooper, PhD Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, 4072, Queensland, Australia. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
M.A.C. is grateful for the support of a National Health and Medical Research Council Australia Fellowship (AF51105). T.M.W. acknowledges the funding support of the Australian Research Council (Future Fellowship FT110100332). Z.V.S. is grateful to the IMB for a PhD scholarship.
This review has been submitted solely to this journal and has not been previously published in any form in another publication of any type.
Abstract: Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a common occurrence following myocardial infarction, transplantation, stroke, and trauma that can lead to multiple organ failure, which remains the foremost cause of death in critically ill patients. Current therapeutic strategies for IRI are mainly palliative, and there is an urgent requirement for a therapeutic that could prevent or reverse tissue damage caused by IRI. Neutrophils are the primary responders following ischemia and reperfusion and represent important components in the protracted inflammatory response and severity associated with IRI. Experimental studies demonstrate neutrophil infiltration at the site of ischemia and show that inducing neutropenia can protect organs from IRI. In this review, we highlight the mechanisms involved in neutrophil recruitment, activation, and adherence and how this contributes to disease severity in IRI. Inhibiting neutrophil mobilization, tissue recruitment, and ultimately neutrophil-associated activation of local and systemic inflammatory responses may have therapeutic potential in the amelioration of local and remote tissue damage following IRI.
Clinical setting of ischemia-reperfusion
Ischemia-reperfusion (IR) has been recognized as a cause of clinical sequelae for more than half a century (6) and remains a common occurrence in coronary bypass surgery, organ transplantation, gut hypoperfusion, and stroke (7, 8). IR is recognized as a complex cascade of events including interactions between vascular endothelium, interstitial compartments, circulating cells, and numerous biochemical entities that follow ischemia. Inflammation is a key mediator of IR, and aspects of the involvement of the innate immune system have been reviewed by others (8–10). Despite our knowledge of the pathophysiology of IR, injury caused by IR precedes clinical observation, and once apparent, it is often too late for intervention. Hence, there is still a need for a therapeutic that could prevent or reverse the effects of the injuries caused by IR (7). A number of failed clinical trials demonstrated that intervention during the first seconds of reperfusion is imperative, and thus the window of opportunity during reperfusion is limited. Therefore, therapeutic options need to be fast acting, readily available by clinicians, and not adversely damaging in their own right.
Causes and effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury
IR is initiated by an ischemic episode, where blood supply is restricted to a portion of an organ or the whole organ, initiating cell death, which is further exacerbated when blood flow is returned. Ischemia results in tissue hypoxia that causes a build-up of metabolic intermediates and reactive oxygen species (ROS), namely, superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radicals. Reactive oxygen species increase intracellular calcium, cause pH changes, and concomitantly deplete ATP and nitric oxide (NO), resulting in damage to cell organelles and leading to necrotic cell death (2, 7). Excessive periods of ischemia, ranging from a few minutes to half an hour or more (11–13), depending on the organ, activates metabolic intermediates and ROS resulting in an overwhelming inflammatory response that leads to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Increased ROS quenches the production of NO and damages endothelial cells, resulting in loss of barrier integrity and release of ROS into the extracellular matrix (13, 14). This increases expression of adhesion molecules (8); acts as a chemoattractant for neutrophils, initiating their recruitment (14); activates the complement cascade (15, 16); and promotes apoptotic cell death (17, 18). Resident macrophages and damaged endothelial cells release proinflammatroy cytokines, further recruiting, activating, and aiding in migration of neutrophils. This overwhelming inflammatory response can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) that are central to the pathogenesis of multiple organ failure (MOF) (1–4), which has a mortality rate of 70% (5). IR injury physiology is complex, but the primary response cells to IRI are neutrophils, which infiltrate the damaged tissue within minutes of activation. Several studies in the 1980s and 1990s investigated the role of neutrophils in IRI (19). In the past 2 decades, more emphasis has been given to the role of molecular, rather than cellular, targets such as complement receptors (20), Toll-like receptors (TLRs) (21), ROS (20), and the proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) (that was subsequently shown not to be involved in IRI) (22). The roles of cytokines, ROS, complement, and TLRs have been emphasized in the pathogenesis of IRI (20, 21) and support, activate, recruit, and amplify the destructive function of neutrophils. Nevertheless, recent studies have returned focus to the role of neutrophils as a key player in the pathophysiology of IRI (16, 23–25). In this review, we highlight the feedback loop of neutrophil recruitment and excessive damage at the site of IRI and how this can result in MOF.
Neutrophils in IRI
At the site of IRI, activated neutrophils further exacerbate host tissue damage through release of ROS, proteinases, and cationic peptides (26). Neutrophils produce a large quantity of ROS when nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase is activated upon adhesion or by proinflammatory cytokines (27). Neutrophils block capillaries preventing reperfusion of the tissue, which leads to tissue necrosis and an exacerbated immune response. Neutrophils secrete proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines to create a positive feedback loop of neutrophil recruitment and activation (16, 28), as illustrated in Figure 1. Furthermore, neutrophil migration causes loss of epithelial barrier integrity and downregulation of junctional adhesion molecule-C (JAMC). JAMC prevents reverse migration of neutrophils (29), which is associated with ARDS, SIRS, and MOF (1, 22, 26). IR can affect every part of the body and is initiated by various mechanisms, depending on the organ or area involved. Therefore, the overactive state of neutrophils in response to excessive ROS, which is also present in normal tissues at lower levels, rather than activation induced via cytokine signaling, could be one reason why a therapeutic to treat or prevent IRI remains elusive. Given the complex pathology of IRI, it is instructive to examine the role of neutrophils in specific organs, the mechanisms involved in IRI in that organ, and how neutrophils contribute to disease severity regardless of the mechanisms involved in recruiting and activating them.
NEUTROPHILS IN ORGAN-SPECIFIC IRI
Cardiac IRI is common after coronary bypass surgery, with myocardial infarction being the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in adults in developed and developing nations (30). After prolonged ischemia, restoration of blood flow induces ROS and production of TNF-α, interleukin 1 (IL-1), IL-6, IL-8, peptide-activating factor (PAF), and macrophage inflammatory factor 2 by endothelial cells, mast cells, and myocytes (31). It also activates complement initiating production of C5a (20). These events significantly increase neutrophil infiltration at the site of IRI, which directly correlates to infarct size (31). Adhesion molecules, such as CD11, CD18, P-selectin, and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) on the endothelium are also upregulated, which then activates neutrophils and enables migration through the endothelium. Neutrophils have deleterious effects in three ways. First, they release a large amount of ROS, which exacerbates tissue damage (14). This was verified in a canine model by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy that showed neutrophils as the major source of ROS during reperfusion (32). Second, they contribute to the no-reflow phenomenon. This can expand the ischemic insult to more than 50% of the capillaries exacerbating tissue damage and necrosis and thus upregulating proinflammatory signals, adhesion molecules, and neutrophil infiltration (31, 33), through the neutrophil feedback loop (Fig. 1). Finally, enthusiastic migration of neutrophils across the endothelial barrier leads to tight junction loss (31, 34) and potentially MOF.
Various animal models inducing neutropenia in feline, canine, bovine, and rodents have exhibited reduced tissue necrosis and myocardial injury (35, 36), as well as demonstrating preservation of endothelial function (37). Chandrasekar and colleagues (39) investigated the role of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α, demonstrating that neutrophil depletion in rats significantly inhibited expression of these cytokines independently of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) (38). Knockout models of P-selectin (40) and ICAM-1 (40, 41) further corroborate the damaging role of neutrophils in IRI as myocardial necrosis in mice was attenuated in relation with reduced neutrophil infiltration.
IRI is a major cause of acute kidney injury, which has a mortality rate in critically ill patients around 50% and causes significant comorbidity (8, 42, 43). Neutrophil infiltration in kidney IRI is seen as early as 30 min after reperfusion and is evident in both animal models and patient biopsies (25). Awad and colleagues (43) recently carried out an extensive study on the role of neutrophils in kidney IRI in a murine model that clamps the renal pedicles to induce IRI. They showed that neutrophil transmigration into the interstitial compartment is responsible for vascular permeability and damage in the kidney.
IRI causes injury to tubular epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and dendritic cells. Resident dendritic cells produce TNF-α, IL-6, monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted) (44), macrophage inflammatory protein 2 (MIP-2), and keratinocyte-derived chemokine (the mouse analog of human IL-8) (42), initiating a potent chemotactic gradient for neutrophil recruitment. Interestingly, in the kidney, IL-8 plays a crucial role in neutrophil recruitment and mediates tissue injury via cytokines, free radical intermediates, and proteases (42, 44). Increased expression of ICAM-1, P-selectin, and IL-8 (45), enables increased adhesion, which has been attributed to nephron destruction (46). Upon degranulation, neutrophils release proteases, myeloperoxidase (MPO), cytokines, and generation of ROS in the outer medulla (42), broadening tissue damage throughout the kidney. Furthermore, neutrophils in conjunction with platelets and red blood cells cause blockage to the capillary, resulting in the no-reflow phenomenon (25), which amplifies the inflammatory response and thus neutrophil infiltration. Activation of the complement system, specifically C3, C5a, and membrane attack complex (C5b-9), is also seen in kidney IRI (42, 47). Membrane attack complex deposition stimulates TNF-α and IL-6 and downregulates Crry, a complement inhibitor on the tubular epithelium (42).
Lung IRI can be initiated by several conditions including lung transplantation, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, resuscitation, atherosclerosis, and pulmonary embolism and remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality (48). Lung IRI can also be initiated from ischemic insult in other organs such as the intestine. Lung injury after intestinal IRI is characterized by increased microvascular permeability, alveolar capillary endothelial cell injury, reduced lung tissue ATP levels, and neutrophil infiltration (49).
Production of ROS is immediately induced upon reperfusion, primarily from alveolar macrophages and endothelial cells. NF-κB, NADPH oxidase, inducible NO synthase, and the proinflammatory cytokines IL-8, IL-12, IL-18, TNF-α, and PAF are activated. These amplify the expression of ICAM-1, CD18, and P-selectin on the endothelial side of the lung (48). These events begin to impair lung function and recruit neutrophils, which generate additional ROS, IL-8, PAF, TNF-α, and MPO. Neutrophils are particularly damaging during this phase as they increase lung permeability and facilitate tissue damage (50). Neutropenia induced in a rat model provides protection from tissue damage corroborating that neutrophils are key in the severity of tissue damage (51). Although IL-8 correlates directly to mortality rate after lung transplantation (48), it predominantly induces chemotaxis in neutrophils (52); indicating that higher mortality rates are most likely due to the damage caused by infiltrating neutrophils rather than IL-8 itself.
The role of neutrophils in liver IRI was well defined by Jaeschke and colleagues (53) in the early 1990s and showed that neutrophils exacerbate liver damage. More recently, reviews by Ramaiah and Jaeschke (24) and Kubes and Mehal (54) provide compelling evidence for the role of neutrophils in liver IRI. MIP-2 and keratinocyte chemoattractant are the main chemoattractants in the liver, which along with TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-8 promote neutrophil accumulation and expression of the CD11/CD18 integrin (24). In the liver, neutrophils adhere within sinusoids independently of selectins, eliminating the requirement of rolling (54). However, activation and accumulation of neutrophils in the sinusoids do not cause tissue damage to the epithelium, as it does in other organs. Only after migrating across the endothelium and in close proximity to the hepatocytes can neutrophils cause damage by oxidative stress, triggered through interaction with CD11/CD18 integrins, NADPH oxidase, and MPO (24, 55). Transendothelial neutrophil migration therefore is an important step in liver IRI, which is controlled by expression of CD11/CD18 and the subsequent binding to ICAM-1 (56, 57). This was further corroborated by Jaeschke and Woolbright (55) in 2012, when they identified the role of complement in directly priming neutrophils for ROS formation and activation of CD11b expression. They also showed that complement promotes Kupffer cell–induced oxidant stress and injury, which indirectly enhances neutrophil responses (55). The role of neutrophils in liver IRI is further supported through the protective effects seen in animal models of neutropenia (58, 59). Although neutropenia is protective, inducing neutropenia in clinical patients would severely immunocompromise them, making them susceptible to many pathogenic diseases. This is why we need to focus on modulating neutrophil behavior rather than preventing it completely.
Intestinal IRI has a relatively small incidence rate, with only 30,000 cases reported per annum in the United States, and has therefore not been given as much attention as other organs. However, intestinal IR is often a secondary event to most critical conditions (60), with severe secondary events being associated with atherosclerosis, obesity, diabetes (16, 61), and α-adrenergic agents or digitalics (3).
Recent evidence reveals neutrophils are a key player in the pathophysiology of intestinal IRI (16, 23, 62), and our histological staining of mouse ileum illustrates neutrophil infiltration and villi destruction (Fig. 2). Importantly, neutrophil depletion has shown to protect the intestine from late-stage mucosal damage and afford protection to remote organs (63–66).
The initial insult, as is characteristic with IRI in all organs, is from ROS. ROS themselves are key mediators in intestinal IRI; they are a primary source of damage initially compromising the integrity of the endothelial barrier (11, 13, 67), promote activation of complement, attract neutrophils, and enhance expression of cell adhesion markers increasing extravascular migration to the sites of inflammation resulting in vascular injury (16, 28, 68).
Complement is activated independently through ROS and neutrophil activation and leads to the production of C5a and IL-1β, potent chemoattractants for neutrophils. C5a further stimulates NF-κB upregulating transcription of proinflammatory cytokines recruiting more neutrophils (11, 69). C5a receptor (C5aR) knockout models show reduced intestinal mucosal damage and decreased neutrophil infiltration, attenuate neutrophil apoptosis, and prevent cytokine release into the plasma (70). TLR-2 and TLR4 contribute to the initiation of an inflammatory response (9) as they signal macrophages, monocytes, and dendritic cells to further recruit neutrophils through production of cytokines. TNF-α upregulates expression of CD11/CD18, which forms firm adhesion with ICAM-1 and P-selectin (71, 72). In intestinal IRI, IL-8, which is secreted from the basolateral surface of the intestinal epithelium, is important for initializing neutrophil migration across the epithelium (73) and neutrophil degranulation (74). Blocking IL-8 in a transgenic mouse model has shown to mitigate intestinal IRI (74). However, platelet levels are increased in parallel to leukocytes in intestinal IRI and bind to neutrophils, increasing their adhesive capabilities to the endothelium independently of IL-8. Production of ROS and PAF (75) amplifies neutrophil numbers, proinflammatory cytokines, and ROS, which fuel tissue damage and increase vascular permeability (16).
We recently showed that neutrophil mobilization from bone marrow, or peripheral pools, following ischemia, plays a key role in inducing intestinal IRI (23). Importantly, intestinal complement activation was observed after IR and corresponds with increased circulating neutrophils. Blocking the major complement activation fragment receptor C3aR worsened injury, by increasing the number of mobilized neutrophils in both the circulation and intestine. This intestinal neutrophil infiltration could in turn be blocked by inhibiting the C5aR, thereby ameliorating intestinal IR pathology. This recent study highlights the importance of the neutrophil and its entry into the blood and subsequently the intestine, in the establishment of intestinal IRI.
Neutrophils and MOF
In intensive care units, 50% of deaths are attributed to MOF (76). Ischemia-reperfusion injury in any organ can result in SIRS, ARDS and MOF. Neutrophil migration in IRI is an important part of excessive damage in all organs as highlighted in previous sections, and reverse migration has been related to systemic inflammation after remote IR events. Woodfin and colleagues (77) demonstrated this event in a mouse model that initiates IRI in the cremaster muscle or lower limb. Using three-dimensional and four-dimensional imaging technology, they observed downregulation of JAMC, which usually prevents reverse migration and transendothelial neutrophil migration, which is depicted in Figure 3. Neutrophils that undergo reverse migration exhibit enhanced ROS generation and more resistance to apoptosis, contributing to systemic inflammation and secondary organ damage (77). Further support for the role of these neutrophils in MOF is a clinical trial analyzing the role of neutrophils in the circulatory and lymphatic system of mesenteric IRI. Disruption of the tight junctions increased vascular permeability. This enabled neutrophils and enteric bacteria to translocate into the circulatory and lymphatic systems. Neutrophils now primed for enhanced ROS production damage remote organs, which is highly attributed to ARDS and MOF (1). These findings further substantiate the need for a therapeutic that can reduce the excessive inflammatory response caused by IRI and show how critical neutrophils are in IRI.
Neutrophil targeting therapeutics to treat IRI
To date, most therapeutics have targeted cytokines, complement, free radicals, platelet-aggregating factor, and adhesion molecules in an attempt to resolve the adverse effects of IRI. So far, such agents have been relatively ineffective clinically (11, 60, 69). Current therapeutic options for IR are merely palliative, offering some relief to the patient’s discomfort, but failing to improve the underlying condition (78).
Several animal studies supplemented with antioxidants demonstrated reduced IRI, and therefore one trialed treatment for IRI has been to increase the levels of NO before surgery as NO regulates ROS (79). During an ischemic state, production of NO is interrupted. Upon reperfusion, the ischemic tissue is overloaded with superoxides that quench any remaining NO and inactivate further production and produce highly toxic peroxynitrite (16). Unfortunately, increasing levels of NO in tissue before ischemia exacerbated IRI (7). Alternate antioxidant treatments such as allopurinol, superoxide dismutase, iron chelators, N-acetyl cysteine, ethanol, captopril, and verapamil have also failed to provide conclusive evidence for clinical end-point success in animal and clinical trials (80, 81). Edaravone (3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one), a potent free radical scavenger, improved survival and renal function in rats subjected to renal IRI (82) and has had success in a clinical pilot study of acute myocardial infarction (83). Recently, stobadine, a novel synthetic pyridoindole antioxidant, which diminishes lipid peroxidation and protein impairment by free radical scavenging and antioxidant activity, has been shown to provide significant protection from IRI in rat kidneys (44). Based on evidence showing hydrogen sulfide (H2S) as a modulator of inflammatory events through interaction with leukocytes (84), Sivarajah and colleagues investigated its role in myocardial IR. They demonstrated that H2S decreases myocardiocyte apoptosis and ICAM-1 expression and neutrophil infiltration (13).
Initial success has been established in preclinical models of IRI for a handful of therapeutics that target neutrophils. A monoclonal antibody targeted against the CD11/CD18 integrin showed promising results in animal models (85–87), but clinical trials failed to show a significant reduction in infarct size (88, 89). G protein–coupled receptors have been very successful for a range of disorders and account for almost a third of all prescription drugs in current use (90). Evidence to date indicates they may also be successful targets for IRI. G protein–coupled receptor 43, which is highly expressed on neutrophils (91), is a receptor for short-chain fatty acids. These have shown to reduce the degree of IRI in rat gut using a model of mesenteric IR (92). Therefore, modulation of neutrophils through G protein–coupled receptor 43 could be a possible future avenue to modulate neutrophil recruitment to organs following IRI. Another G protein–coupled receptor, adenosine 2A (A2A) receptor, also has protective effects. It reduced infarct size in a pig model of myocardial IRI (93) and inhibited adhesion molecules on endothelial cells and reduced neutrophil numbers in a mouse model of kidney IRI (94).
Complement inhibition is another attractive target. Gut, liver, kidney, limb, and brain models have revealed the role of complement as a key mediator of postischemic damage (95, 96). Further studies supplement these findings, showing that complement inhibitors such as recombinant sCR1 do reduce IRI in various organs (2, 72, 97–100). However, complement inhibitors have the drawback that they have to block tissue injury while preserving its function to prevent infection and eliminate immune complexes; failure to do this leaves the patient severely immunocompromised and susceptible to infection (101). To date, eculizumab is the only clinically available therapeutic that specifically targets the complement system and is approved for use in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome (102). It specifically targets C5, preventing its cleavage into C5a, a potent chemoattractant, and C5b, which forms membrane attack complex. C5a is an important chemoattractant for neutrophils, and therefore blocking C5 could reduce neutrophil infiltration in IRI. Unfortunately, pexelizumab, a close analog to eculizumab that also inhibits cleavage of C5, failed to reduce infarct size in a human myocardial infarction trial (103). In animal models where IR is induced, complement depletion significantly reduces neutrophil numbers and decreases lung permeability (104). Hence, there is a strong possibility that reduction of IRI when inhibiting complement is actually due to a reduction in neutrophil infiltration, inferring that a therapeutic intervention that targets neutrophils specifically could be the key to preventing IRI. In support of this hypothesis, we recently demonstrated that infusion of C3a agonist peptide to mice reduced neutrophil mobilization after intestinal IRI, which resulted in reduced tissue neutrophil infiltration and ameliorated disease pathology (23).
Many failures have been observed in an attempt to prevent and treat IRI. These failings could be due to a number of reasons, from a lack of understanding of the pathophysiology to insufficiency of the disease models. A main hurdle in drug development is the translation of the efficacy in animal models to humans. Clinical trials for therapeutics that target inflammatory responses have been particularly fruitless in the treatment of IRI, with promising in vivo data in animal models failing to relate clinically. The success of therapeutics could be restricted by the availability of models that can truly reflect in vivo biology, which has been highlighted recently in a number of reviews (105–107). Furthermore, current studies generally use or target only one component that impedes activation or migration of neutrophils. Targeting several key factors at the same time could provide better protection from IRI without compromising any one area of the immune system and thus resulting in better patient outcomes.
In reality, the insult from IRI is multifactorial, and a therapeutic that targets a single molecular aspect of pathology will most likely continue to be ineffective. As such, therapeutics should aim to target multiple pathways, or indeed whole cells such as the neutrophil, to maximize the impact of reducing the inflammatory response caused by IRI. IRI can occur in just about every part of the body and has a plethora of etiologies that are specific to the initial insult, area, and organ in which it takes place. Regardless, it is apparent that all mechanisms lead to recruitment and activation of neutrophils, which have been shown to correlate with disease severity. Therefore, the ultimate therapeutic or combination of therapeutics would ideally dampen the inflammatory signals that mobilize and recruit neutrophils or regulate neutrophils directly in order to prevent IRI from developing.
IRI is common during various traumatic and surgical events and responsible for ARDS and MOF, which causes death in more than half of all patients affected. Various strategies have been used to prevent the adverse effects of IRI, but the complex pathophysiology of IRI continues to evade treatment. The inflammatory response is indubitably a key mediator of IRI. In addition, this review has emphasized the importance of neutrophils as a significant contributor to the progression of IRI. Neutrophils contribute to the severity of IRI by exacerbating ischemia through blockage of capillaries (no-reflow phenomenon), escalating the inflammatory response by releasing cytokines, damaging cells unaffected by ischemia through release of ROS, and, potentially most significantly, by disrupting the endothelial and epithelial barriers, which leads to MOF. Therapeutics have targeted several pathways involved in the pathophysiology of IRI but so far have failed to provide an effective therapy to ameliorate outcomes. This review has highlighted the underlying and necessary role of neutrophils in IRI. Further understanding of the mechanisms involved in mobilization, transmigration, and activation of neutrophils in IRI could lead to a potential therapeutic target that can prevent the onset of IRI.
The authors thank Alberto Boucas Da Silva for his critical review of the manuscript.
1. Feinberg H, Levitsky S: Postbypass treatment. Ann Thorac Surg 20 (1): 106–113, 1975.
2. Widgerow AD: Ischemia-reperfusion injury: influencing the microcirculatory and cellular environment. Ann Plast Surg 2012 Dec 13. [Epub ahead of print]
3. Linfert D, Chowdhry T, Rabb H: Lymphocytes and ischemia-reperfusion injury. Transplant Rev 23 (1): 1–10, 2009.
4. Boros P, Bromberg JS: New cellular and Mol immune pathways in ischemia/reperfusion injury. Am J Transplant 6 (4): 652–658, 2006.
5. Arslan F, Keogh B, McGuirk P, Parker a E: TLR2 and TLR4 in ischemia reperfusion injury. Mediat Inflamm 2010: 704202, 2010.
6. Yoshiya K, Lapchak PH, Thai T-H, Kannan L, Rani P, Dalle Lucca JJ, Tsokos GC: Depletion of gut commensal bacteria attenuates intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 301 (6): G1020–G1030, 2011.
7. Cerqueira NF, Hussni CA, Yoshida WB: PathoPhysiol of mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion: a review. Acta Cir Bras 20 (4): 336–343, 2005.
8. Jin R, Yang G, Li G: Inflammatory mechanisms in ischemic stroke: role of inflammatory cells. J Leukoc Biol 87 (5): 779–789, 2010.
9. Grootjans J, Lenaerts K, Derikx JPM, Matthijsen RA, de Bruïne AP, Van Bijnen AA, van Dam RM, Dejong CHC, Buurman WA: Human intestinal ischemia-reperfusion–induced inflammation characterized: experiences from a new translational model. Am J Pathol 176 (5): 2283–2291, 2010.
10. Braunersreuther V, Jaquet V: Reactive oxygen species in myocardial reperfusion injury: from physiopathololgy to therapeutic approaches. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 13 (1): 97–114, 2012.
11. Farrar CA, Asgari E, Schwaeble WJ, Sacks SH: Which pathways trigger the role of complement in ischaemia/reperfusion injury? Front Immunol 3 (341): 1–6, 2012.
12. Rodrigues SF, Granger DN: Role of blood cells in ischaemia-reperfusion induced endothelial barrier failure. Cardiovasc Res 87 (2): 291–299, 2010.
13. Sivarajah A, Collino M, Yasin M, Benetti E, Gallicchio M, Mazzon E, Cuzzocrea S, Fantozzi R, Thiemermann C: Anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects of hydrogen sulfide in a rat model of regional myocardial I/R. Shock 31 (3): 267–274, 2009.
14. Wang WZ, Fang X-H, Stephenson LL, Khiabani KT, Zamboni WA: Ischemia/reperfusion–induced necrosis and apoptosis in the cells isolated from rat skeletal muscle. J Orthop Res 26 (3): 351–356, 2008.
15. Dzieciatkowska M, Wohlauer M V, Moore EE, Damle S, Peltz E, Campsen J, Kelher M, Silliman C, Banerjee A, Hansen KC: Proteomic analysis of human mesenteric lymph. Shock 35 (4): 331–338, 2011.
16. Chen L-W, Chang W-J, Chen P-H, Liu W-C, Hsu C-M: TLR ligand decreases mesenteric ischemia and reperfusion injury–induced gut damage through TNF-alpha signaling. Shock 30 (5): 563–570, 2008.
17. Alverdy JC, Chang EB: The re-emerging role of the intestinal microflora in critical illness and inflammation: why the gut hypothesis of sepsis syndrome will not go away. J Leukoc Biol 83 (3): 461–466, 2008.
18. Pope MR, Bukovnik U, Tomich JM, Fleming SD: Small β2-glycoprotein I peptides protect from intestinal ischemia reperfusion injury. J Immunol 189 (10): 5047–5056, 2012.
19. Hernandez LA, Grisham MB, Twohig B, Arfors KE, Harlan JM, Granger DN: Role of neutrophils in ischemia-reperfusion–induced microvascular injury. Am J Physiol 253: H699–H703, 1987.
20. Arumugam T V, Shiels IA, Woodruff TM, Granger DN, Taylor SM: The role of the complement system in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Shock 21 (5): 401–409, 2004.
21. Arumugam T V, Okun E, Tang S-C, Thundyil J, Taylor SM, Woodruff TM: Toll-like receptors in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Shock 32 (1): 4–16, 2009.
22. Soares AL, Coelho FR, Guabiraba R, Kamal M, Vargaftig BB, Li L, Li J, Tavares-de-Lima W, Ryffel B: Tumor necrosis factor is not associated with intestinal ischemia/reperfusion–induced lung inflammation. Shock 34 (3): 306–313, 2010.
23. Wu MCL, Brennan FH, Lynch JPL, Mantovani S, Phipps S, Wetsel RA, Ruitenberg MJ, Taylor S, Woodruff TM: The receptor for complement component C3a mediates protection from intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injuries by inhibiting neutrophil mobilization. PNAS 1–6, 2013.
24. Ramaiah SK, Jaeschke H: Role of neutrophils in the pathogenesis of acute inflammatory liver injury. Toxicol Pathol 35 (6): 757–766, 2007.
25. Bolisetty S, Agarwal A: Neutrophils in acute kidney injury: not neutral any more. Kidney Int 75 (7): 674–676, 2009.
26. Grommes J, Soehnlein O: Contribution of neutrophils to acute lung injury. Mol Med 17 (3–4): 293–307, 2011.
27. El-Benna J, Dang PM-C, Gougerot-Pocidalo M-A: Priming of the neutrophil NADPH oxidase activation: role of p47phox phosphorylation and NOX2 mobilization to the plasma membrane. Semin Immunopathol 30 (3): 279–289, 2008.
28. Fialkow L, Wang Y, Downey GP: Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species as signaling molecules regulating neutrophil function. Free Radic Biol Med 42 (2): 153–164, 2007.
29. Kolaczkowska E, Kubes P: Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 13 (3): 159–175, 2013.
30. Mathers CD, Loncar D: Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med 3 (11): 2011–2030, 2006.
31. Vinten-Johansen J: Involvement of neutrophils in the pathogenesis of lethal myocardial reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res 61 (3): 481–497, 2004.
32. Duilio C, Ambrosio G, Kuppusamy P, DiPaula A, Becker LC, Zweier JL: Neutrophils are primary source of O2
radicals during reperfusion after prolonged myocardial ischemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ 280 (6): H2649–H2657, 2001.
33. Kakkar AK, Lefer DJ: Leukocyte and endothelial adhesion molecule studies in knockout mice. Curr Opin Pharmacol 4 (2): 154–158, 2004.
34. Fan H, Sun B, Gu Q, Lafond-Walker A, Cao S, Becker LC: Oxygen radicals trigger activation of NF-kappaB and AP-1 and upregulation of ICAM-1 in reperfused canine heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ 282 (5): H1778–H1786, 2002.
35. Litt MR, Jeremy RW, Weisman HF, Winkelstein JA, Becker LC: Neutrophil depletion limited to reperfusion reduces myocardial infarct size after 90 minutes of ischemia. Evidence for neutrophil-mediated reperfusion injury. Circulation 80 (6): 1816–1827, 1989.
36. Romson JL, Hook BG, Kunkel SL, Abrams GD, Schork MA., Lucchesi BR: Reduction of the extent of ischemic myocardial injury by neutrophil depletion in the dog. Circulation 67 (5): 1016–1023, 1983.
37. Budde JM, Morris CD, Velez DA, Muraki S, Wang N-P, Guyton RA, Zhao ZQ: Reduction of infarct size and preservation of endothelial function by multidose intravenous adenosine during extended reperfusion. J Surg Res 116 (1): 104–115, 2004.
38. Chandrasekar B, Colston JT, Geimer J, Cortez D, Freeman GL: Induction of nuclear factor kB but not kB-responsive cytokine expression during myocardial reperfusion injury after neutropenia. Free Radic Biol Med 28 (11): 1579–1588, 2000.
39. Palazzo AJ, Jones SP, Anderson DC, Granger DN, Lefer DJ: Coronary endothelial P-selectin in pathogenesis of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Heart Circ 275 (5): H1865–H1872, 1998.
40. Jones SP, Trocha SD, Strange MB, Granger DN, Kevil CG, Bullard DC, Lefer DJ: Leukocyte and endothelial cell adhesion molecules in a chronic murine model of myocardial reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Heart Circ 279 (5): H2196–H2201, 2000.
41. Entman ML, Michael L, Rossen RD, Dreyer WJ, Anderson DC, Taylor AA, Smith CW: Inflammation in the course of early myocardial ischemia. FASEB J 5 (11): 2529–2537, 1991.
42. Jang HR, Rabb H: The innate immune response in ischemic acute kidney injury. Clin Immunol 130 (1): 41–50, 2009.
43. Awad AS, Rouse M, Huang L, Vergis AL, Reutershan J, Cathro HP, Linden J, Okusa MD: Compartmentalization of neutrophils in the kidney and lung following acute ischemic kidney injury. Kidney Int 75 (7): 689–698, 2009.
44. Bajwa A., Kinsey G.R., Okusa MD: Immune mechanisms and novel pharmacological therapies of acute kidney injury. Curr Drug Targets 10 (12): 1196–1204, 2009.
45. Jang HR, Ko GJ, Wasowska BA, Rabb H: The interaction between ischemia-reperfusion and immune responses in the kidney. J Mol Med 87 (9): 859–864, 2009.
46. Lauriat S, Linas SL: The role of neutrophils in acute renal failure. Semin Nephrol 18 (5): 498–504, 1998.
47. Arumugam T V, Shiels IA, Woodruff TM, Granger DN, Taylor SM: The role of the complement system in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Shock 21 (5): 401–409, 2004.
48. Den Hengst WA, Gielis JF, Lin JY, Van Schil PE, De Windt LJ, Moens AL: Lung ischemia-reperfusion injury: a Mol and clinical view on a complex pathophysiological process. Am J Physiol Heart Circ 299 (5): H1283–H1299, 2010.
49. Schmeling DJ, Caty MG, Oldham KT, Guice KS, Hinshaw DB: Evidence for neutrophil-related acute lung injury after intestinal ischemia-reperfusion. Surgery 106 (2): 195–202, 1989.
50. Eppinger M, Jones M, Deeb M, Bolling S, Ward P: Pattern of injury and the role of neutrophils in reperfusion injury of rat lung. J Surg Res 58: 713–718, 1995.
51. Seekamp A, Mulligan MS, Till GO, Ward PA: Requirements for neutrophil products and L-arginine in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Pathol 142 (4): 1217–1226, 1993.
52. Vlahopoulos S, Boldogh I, Casola A and Brasier AR: Nuclear factor-kappaB-dependent induction of interleukin-8 gene expression by tumor necrosis factor alpha: evidence for an antioxidant sensitive activating pathway distinct from nuclear translocation. Blood 94: 1878–1889, 1999.
53. Jaeschke H, Farhood A, Smith CW: Neutrophil-induced liver cell injury in endotoxin shock is a CD11b/CD18–dependent mechanism neutrophil-induced liver cell injury in endotoxin is a CD11b/CDW–dependent mechanism shock. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 261: G1051–G1056, 1991.
54. Kubes P, Mehal WZ: Sterile inflammation in the liver. Gastroenterology 143 (5): 1158–1172, 2012.
55. Jaeschke H, Woolbright BL: Current strategies to minimize hepatic ischemia–reperfusion injury by targeting reactive oxygen species. Transplant Rev 26 (2): 103–114, 2012.
56. Gujral JS, Farhood A, Bajt ML, Jaeschke H: Neutrophils aggravate acute liver injury during obstructive cholestasis in bile duct–ligated mice. Hepatology 38 (2): 355–363, 2003.
57. Gujral JS, Liu J, Farhood A, Hinson JA, Jaeschke H: Functional importance of ICAM-1 in the mechanism of neutrophil-induced liver injury in bile duct–ligated mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 286 (3): G499–G507, 2004.
58. Simpson R, Alon R, Kobzik L, Valeri CR, Shepro D, Hechtman HB: Neutrophil and nonneutrophil–mediated injury in intestinal ischemia reperfusion. Ann Surg 218 (4): 444–453, 1993.
59. Langdale LA, Flaherty LC, Liggit DH, Harlan JM, Rice CL, Winn RK: Neutrophils contribute to hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury by a CD18-independent. J Leukoc Biol 53: 511–517, 1993.
60. Stallion A, Kou TD, Latifi SQ, Miller KA, Dahms BB, Dudgeon DL, Levine AD: Ischemia/reperfusion: a clinically relevant model of intestinal injury yielding systemic inflammation. J Pediatr Surg 40 (3): 470–477, 2005.
61. Panes J, Kurose I, Rodriguez-Vaca MD, Anderson DC, Miyasaka M, Tso P: Diabetes exacerbates inflammatory responses to ischemia-reperfusion. Circulation 93 (1): 161–167, 1996.
62. Shigematsu T, Wolf RE, Granger DN: T-lymphocytes modulate the microvascular and inflammatory responses to intestinal ischemia-reperfusion. Microcirculation 9 (2): 99–109, 2002.
63. Yu LC-H: Protective mechanism against gut barrier dysfunction in mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion clinical aspects of intestinal I/R. Adapt Med 2 (1): 11–22, 2010.
64. Kaneko H, Tamura A, Ishii T, Maeda T, Katagiri T, Ishii J, Kubota Y, Suzuki T, Tsuchiya M, Otsuka Y, et al.: Bacterial translocation in small intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury and efficacy of anti-CINC antibody treatment. Eur Surg Res 39 (3): 153–159, 2007.
65. Tsuruma T, Yagihashi A, Tarumi K, Hirata K: Anti–rat IL-8 (CINC) monoclonal antibody administration reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury in small intestine. Transplant Proc 30 (6): 2644–2645, 1998.
66. Yagihashi A, Tsuruma T, Tarumi K, Kameshima T, Yajima T, Yanai Y, Watanabe N, Hirata K: Prevention of small intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat by anti–cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant monoclonal antibody. J Surg Res 78 (2): 92–96, 1998.
67. Usatyuk P V, Natarajan V: Regulation of reactive oxygen species-induced endothelial cell-cell and cell-matrix contacts by focal adhesion kinase and adherens junction proteins. Am J Physiol-Lung C 289 (6): L999–L1010, 2005.
68. Arumugam TV, Shiels IA, Woodruff TM, Reid RC, Fairlie DP, Taylor SM: Protective effect of a new C5a receptor antagonist against ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat small intestine. J Surg Res 103 (2): 260–267, 2002.
69. Arslan F, de Kleijn DPV, Timmers L, Doevendans PA, Pasterkamp G: Bridging innate immunity and myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury: the search for therapeutic targets. Curr Pharm Design 14 (12): 1205–1216, 2008.
70. Xu D, Zaets SB, Chen R, Lu Q, Rajan H, Yang X: Elimination of C5aR prevents intestinal mucosal damage and attenuates neutrophil infiltration in local and remote organs. Shock 31 (5): 493–499, 2009.
71. Ortolano GA, Capetandes A, Wenz B: A review of leukofiltration therapy for decreasing the morbidity associated with cardiopulmonary bypass and acute inflammatory bowel disease. Ther Apher 6 (2): 119–129, 2002.
72. Collard C, Gelman S: PathoPhysiolology, clinical manifestations, and prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Anesthesiology 94 (6): 1133–1138, 2001.
73. Mumy KL, McCormick BA: The role of neutrophils in the event of intestinal inflammation. Curr Opin Pharmacol 9 (6): 697–701, 2009.
74. Kucharzik T, Hudson JT, Lügering A, Abbas JA, Bettini M, Lake JG, Evans ME, Ziegler TR, Merlin D, Madara JL, et al.: Acute induction of human IL-8 production by intestinal epithelium triggers neutrophil infiltration without mucosal injury. Gut 54 (11): 1565–1572, 2005.
75. Hansen PR: Role of neutrophils in myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Circulation 91 (6): 1872–1885, 1995.
76. Angus DC, Barnato AE, Linde-Zwirble WT, Weissfeld LA, Watson RS, Rickert T, Rubenfeld GD: Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med 32 (3): 638–643, 2004.
77. Woodfin A, Voisin M, Beyrau M, Colom B, Caille D, Diapouli F, Diapouli F-M, Nash GB, Chavakis T, Albelda SM, et al.: Junctional adhesion molecule-C (JAM-C) regulates polarized neutrophil transendothelial cell migration in vivo
. Nat Immunol 12 (8): 761–769, 2012.
78. Goldsmith JR, Perez-Chanona E, Yadav PN, Whistler J, Roth B, Jobin C: Intestinal epithelial cell–derived μ-opioid signaling protects against ischemia reperfusion injury through PI3K Signaling. Am J Pathol 1–11, 2013.
79. Thomas DD, Ridnour LA, Isenberg JS, Flores-Santana W, Switzer CH, Donzelli S, Hussain P, Vecoli C, Paolocci N, Ambs S, et al.: The chemical biology of nitric oxide: implications in cellular signaling. Free Radic Biol Med 45 (1): 18–31, 2008.
80. Sonoda A, Nitta N, Seko A, Ohta S, Takemura S, Miyagawa Y, Takahashi M, Murata M: Edaravone prevents bowel infarction after acute superior mesenteric artery thromboembolism using autologous fibrin clots in a rabbit model. Br J Radiol 82 (981): 711–715, 2009.
81. Mallick IH, Yang W, Winslet MC, Seifalian AM: Ischemia-reperfusion injury of the intestine and protective strategies against injury. Dig Dis Sci 49 (9): 1359–1377, 2004.
82. Suzuki T: Additional lung-protective perfusion techniques during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 16 (3): 150–155, 2010.
83. Tsujita K, Shimomura H, Kawano H, Hokamaki J, Fukuda M, Yamashita T, Hida S, Nakamura Y, Nagayoshi Y, Sakamoto M, et al.: Effects of edaravone on reperfusion injury in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 94 (4): 481–484, 2004.
84. Zanardo RCO, Brancaleone V, Distrutti E, Fiorucci S, Cirino G, Wallace JL: Hydrogen sulfide is an endogenous modulator of leukocyte-mediated inflammation. FASEB J 20 (12): 2118–2120, 2006.
85. Tajra LC, Martin X, Margonari J, Blanc-Brunat N, Ishibashi M, Vivier G, Panaye G, Steghens JP, Kawashima H, Miyasaka M, Treille-Ritouet D, Dubernard JM, Revillard JP In vivo
effects of monoclonal antibodies against rat beta(2) integrins on kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Surg Res 87 (1): 32–38, 1999.
86. Gardinali M, Borrelli E, Chiara O, Lundberg C, Padalino P, Conciato L, Cafaro C, Lazzi S, Luzi P, Giomarelli PP, et al.: Inhibition of CD11-CD18 complex prevents acute lung injury and reduces mortality after peritonitis in rabbits. Am J Respir Crit Care 161 (3 Pt 1): 1022–1029, 2000.
87. Zhang ZG, Chopp M, Tang WX, Jiang N, Zhang RL: Postischemic treatment (2–4 h) with anti-CD11b and anti-CD18 monoclonal antibodies are neuroprotective after transient (2 h) focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Brain Res 698 (1–2): 79–85, 1995.
88. Faxon DP, Gibbons RJ, Chronos N a F, Gurbel PA, Sheehan F: The effect of blockade of the CD11/CD18 integrin receptor on infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with direct angioplasty: the results of the HALT-MI study. J Am Coll Cardiol 40 (7): 1199–1204, 2002.
89. Rusnak JM, Kopecky SL, Clements IP, Gibbons RJ, Holland AE, Peterman HS, Martin JS, Saoud JB, Feldman RL, Breisblatt WM, et al.: Antibody in patients with acute percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (the FESTIVAL study). Am J Cardiol 88: 482–487, 2001.
90. Heilker R, Wolff M, Tautermann CS, Bieler M: G-protein–coupled receptor-focused drug discovery using a target class platform approach. Drug Discov Today 14 (5–6): 231–240, 2009.
91. Ulven T: Short-chain free fatty acid receptors FFA2/GPR43 and FFA3/GPR41 as new potential therapeutic targets. Front Endocrinol 3: 111, 2012.
92. Baba AA, Srinivas M, Shariff A, Nazir T: Role of short chain fatty acids in mesenteric ischemia reperfusion injury in rats. Eur J Paediatr Surg 20: 98–101, 2010.
93. Lasley RD, Jahania MS, Mentzer RM: Beneficial effects of adenosine A2a agonist CGS-21680 in infarcted and stunned porcine myocardium. Am J Physiol Heart Circ 280: H1660–H1666, 2001.
94. Okusa MD, Linden J, Huang L, Rieger JM, Macdonald TL, Huynh LP: A2A adenosine receptor-mediated inhibition of renal injury and neutrophil adhesion. Am J Physiol-Renal 279: F809–F818, 2000.
95. Fleming SD, Mastellos D, Karpel-Massler G, Shea-Donohue T, Lambris JD, Tsokos GC: C5a causes limited, polymorphonuclear cell-independent, mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion–induced injury. Clin Immunol 108 (3): 263–273, 2003.
96. Stahl GL, Xu Y, Hao L, Miller M, Buras JA, Fung M, Zhao H: Role for the alternative complement pathway in ischemia/reperfusion injury. Am J Pathol 162 (2): 449–455, 2003.
97. Arumugam T V, Shiels IA, Strachan AJ, Abbenante G, Fairlie DP, Taylor SM: A small molecule C5a receptor antagonist protects kidneys from ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. Kidney Int 63 (1): 134–142, 2003.
98. Arumugam T V, Woodruff TM, Stocks SZ, Proctor LM, Pollitt S, Shiels IA, Reid RC, Fairlie DP, Taylor SM: Protective effect of a human C5a receptor antagonist against hepatic ischaemia-reperfusion injury in rats. J Hepatol 40 (6): 934–941, 2004.
99. Woodruff TM, Arumugam T V, Shiels IA, Reid RC, Fairlie DP, Taylor SM: Protective effects of a potent C5a receptor antagonist on experimental acute limb ischemia-reperfusion in rats. J Surg Res 116 (1): 81–90, 2004.
100. Pavlovski D, Thundyil J, Monk PN, Wetsel RA, Taylor SM, Woodruff TM: Generation of complement component C5a by ischemic neurons promotes neuronal apoptosis. FASEB J 26 (9): 3680–3690, 2012.
101. Wagner E, Frank MM: Therapeutic potential of complement modulation. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9 (1): 43–56, 2010.
102. Woodruff TM, Nandakumar KS, Tedesco F: Inhibiting the C5-C5a receptor axis. Mol Immunol 48 (14): 1631–1642, 2011.
103. Martel C, Granger CB, Ghitescu M, Stebbins A, Fortier A, Armstrong PW, Bonnefoy A, Theroux P: Pexelizumab fails to inhibit assembly of the terminal complement complex in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Insight from a substudy of the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardia. Am Heart J 164 (1): 43–51, 2012.
104. Arumugam T V, Magnus T, Woodruff TM, Proctor LM, Shiels IA, Taylor SM: Complement mediators in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Clin Chim Acta 374 (1–2): 33–45, 2006.
105. Seok J, Warren HS, Cuenca AG, Mindrinos MN, Baker H V, Xu W, Richards DR, McDonald-Smith GP, Gao H, Hennessy L, et al.: Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. PNAS 1–6, 2013.
106. Woodcock J, Woosley R: The FDA critical path initiative and its influence on new drug development. Annu Rev Med 59: 1–12, 2008.
107. Hayday AC, Peakman M: The habitual, diverse and surmountable obstacles to human immunology research. Nat Immunol 9 (6): 575–580, 2008.
Inflammation; multiple organ failure; migration; cytokines
© 2013 by the Shock Society
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Highlight selected keywords in the article text.
Data is temporarily unavailable. Please try again soon.
Readers Of this Article Also Read