Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Supplements Videos For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2006 - Volume 26 - Issue 1 > Reading Speed of Patients With Advanced Retinitis Pigmentosa...
Original Articles

Reading Speed of Patients With Advanced Retinitis Pigmentosa or Choroideremia


Collapse Box


Purpose: To quantify, account for, and enhance the reading speed of patients with generalized retinal degeneration and small central visual fields.

Methods: Thirty-three patients with retinitis pigmentosa or choroideremia and 12 normal controls participated in the study. The patients had visual acuities of 20/200 or better, central visual field diameters of ≤20°, and log10 contrast sensitivities of ≤1.65. Reading speed was measured by having participants silently read timed sentences presented with differing font size, font type (Times vs. Courier), and text polarity (standard black text on a white background vs. reversed white text on a black background) and then recall that text aloud.

Results: The patients' mean reading speed for standard polarity text using the Times font and their optimal font size was 43% of normal (P< 0.001). Patient reading speed was significantly related to visual acuity (r 2 = 0.44; P< 0.001) and to contrast sensitivity (r 2 = 0.68; P < 0.001) but not to central visual field diameter. In a multiple regression model, only contrast sensitivity by itself was a strong independent predictor of patient reading speed, although visual acuity and visual field in combination did nearly as well. On average, the patients read significantly faster with the Times font than with the Courier font (P< 0.001). The percentage improvement in reading speed with reverse polarity text was most related to contrast sensitivity (r 2 = 0.47; P< 0.001), and 83% of patients with log10 contrast sensitivity of <1.0 versus 36% with higher contrast sensitivity read faster with reverse polarity text (P= 0.02).

Conclusion: Patients with retinitis pigmentosa or choroideremia and small central fields have, on average, impaired reading speed associated primarily with reduced contrast sensitivity, and those with very poor contrast sensitivity will most likely benefit from reversing text polarity.

© The Ophthalmic Communications Society, Inc.


Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.