You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Pay-for-Performance in Health Care: What Can We Learn From International Experience?

Wilson, Kimberly J. MPIA

Quality Management in Health Care:
doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e31827dea50
Original Articles
Abstract

As industrialized countries around the world encounter rising health care costs with little to show in quality and health outcome improvements, they increasingly are turning to pay-for-performance mechanisms to align provider action with quality, equity, and efficiency goals. The primary objective of most pay-for-performance schemes is to improve quality of care, and the logic of linking financial rewards to quality and performance metrics makes sense. However, despite broad international experience with pay-for-performance, evidence of its impact is limited, frequently conflicting, focuses largely on improvements in the provision and structure of care rather than health outcomes, and tends to generate more questions than it does answers.

Author Information

Division of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, Austin, Texas.

Correspondence: Kimberly J. Wilson, MPIA, Division of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, Austin Regional Campus, 1616 Guadalupe St, 6th Floor, Austin, TX 78701 (Kimberly.j.wilson@uth.tmc.edu).

Disclosure: No funding was received in support of this work.

No conflicts of interest exist with respect to this article.

©2013Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.