Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections Podcasts For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2009 - Volume 71 - Issue 1 > Patients With Pain Disorder Show Gray-Matter Loss in Pain-Pr...
Psychosomatic Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31818d1e02
Original Articles

Patients With Pain Disorder Show Gray-Matter Loss in Pain-Processing Structures: A Voxel-Based Morphometric Study

Valet, Michael MD; Gündel, Harald MD; Sprenger, Till MD; Sorg, Christian MD; Mühlau, Mark MD; Zimmer, Claus MD; Henningsen, Peter MD; Tölle, Thomas R. MD

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

From the Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik (M.V., M.M., T.S., T.R.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Germany; Abteilung Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie (H.G.), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie (C.S.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Germany; Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin (H.G., P.H.), Psychotherapie und Med. Psychologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Germany; Abteilung für Neuroradiologie (C.Z.), Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Germany.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Michael Valet, Neurologische Klinik, Klinikum r.d. Isar der TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany. E-mail: valet@lrz.tum.de

M.V. and H.G. contributed equally to this study.

Received for publication April 1, 2008; revision received June 17, 2008.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether the functional changes in pain disorder might be reflected by structural brain changes. Pain disorder assessed with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) criteria is characterized by persistent and distressing chronic pain at one or more body sites which cannot be fully explained by a physiological process or somatic disorder. Psychological factors are thought to play a major role. Recent neuroimaging studies evidenced altered pain processing in patients suffering from this disorder.

Methods: Fourteen right-handed women fulfilling the DSM-IV criteria for pain disorder and 25 healthy age-matched women were investigated with magnetic resonance imaging. In the voxel-based morphometry analysis, we compared both groups for changes of gray-matter density. We included age and Beck Depression Inventory scores as nuisance variables to minimize possible confounding effects of age or depressive comorbidity.

Results: In the patient group, we found significant gray-matter decreases in the prefrontal, cingulate, and insular cortex. These regions are known to be critically involved in the modulation of subjective pain experiences.

Conclusions: In the context of similar results in patients with other functional pain syndromes, such as fibromyalgia and chronic back pain, we suggest that structural changes in fronto-limbic brain circuits represent not only an objective marker of these pain syndromes but also constitute a critical pathophysiological element. These findings represent a further proof of the important role of central changes in pain disorder.

DSM-IV = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition; ICD-10 = International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision; VBM = voxel-based morphometry; fMRI = functional magnetic resonance imaging; GM = gray matter; WM = white matter; CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; MNI = standardized reference space defined by the Montreal Neurological Institute; SOMS = screening for somatoform symptoms; PPS = Pain Perception Scale; SCID = Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV disorders.

Back to Top | Article Outline

INTRODUCTION

According to the diagnostic criteria of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV), pain disorder is defined as persistent and chronic pain at one or more sites that cannot be fully explained by a physiological process or physical disorder. This disorder seems to be regularly linked to emotional dysregulation, which is associated with a high affective description of individual pain (1). An overlap with anxiety and/or depressive disorders has been described in 25% to 60% of cases (1). It has a lifetime prevalence of 12.2%, accounting for the vast majority of the total 12.9% somatoform disorder prevalence rates in the German general population (2).

Patients suffering from functional somatic syndromes, such as pain disorder (3,4), fibromyalgia (5–7), idiopathic chronic low back pain (8), or irritable bowel syndrome (9–11) seem to have an altered cerebral pain processing as evidenced with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Recent voxel-based morphometry (VBM) studies point to structural brain changes associated with these syndromes, which have been already observed in patients with fibromyalgia (12,13) or chronic back pain (14,15).

VBM is a novel method that has been proven to be a powerful method for the in vivo study of human brain structure in healthy subjects and patients (16). However, the physiological basis of structural changes in VBM is not well understood. It is widely assumed that gray matter (GM) loss in VBM corresponds to neural degeneration (17,18). This assumption has been proven for neurodegenerative diseases, such as Huntington disease, Parkinson disease, Alzheimer disease, mild cognitive impairment, and multiple system atrophy (19–22). Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated that changes of regional GM density are directly related to alterations of functional abilities (23–25). Moreover, increases of GM density seem to be related with increases of task-specific neuronal activation (26).

Encouraged by the VBM results in certain chronic pain syndromes and our previous findings of functional alterations of cerebral pain processing in pain disorder (3), we investigated patients suffering from pain disorder using VBM and hypothesized that GM changes would occur in pain-processing brain structures.

Furthermore, the classification of pain disorder as a mental disorder (Axis I) within the framework of DSM-IV has been hardly criticized. Therefore, it has been suggested to move pain disorder like other functional somatic syndromes to Axis III (general medical disorders) (27). Up to now, there is no clear evidence for structural central damage in pain disorder, which may be suggestive of explanatory pathology (28). If, beyond functional central nervous system changes, structural brain changes could be demonstrated in pain disorder, assigning the diagnosis of pain disorder to Axis III (general medical disorders) would no longer seem appropriate. Instead, such a finding would favor a new category of so-called general medical mental interface disorders (29,30).

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODS

Patients and Volunteers

The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the Technische Universität München and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The patient and healthy volunteer investigations took place between 2004 and 2006.

Fourteen right-handed female patients (medium age = 51.1 years; range = 28-68 years) fulfilling the DSM-IV criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) (31) for pain disorder were selected from a consecutive sample of patients scheduled for a visit in the psychosomatic outpatient department of the Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Germany. The predominant, although in most cases diffuse, clinical pain in the patient group was located in the head, neck, and shoulder region (diffuse headache, n = 4), in the lower back region (low back pain, n = 7), temporomandibular (facial pain, n = 1), in the pelvic region (lower abdomen, n = 1), or in the lower limbs (n = 1). Three subjects reported more than one predominant pain location (two subjects with headache as well as back pain, one subject with pain of the sacrococcygeal region and thigh with the pain radiating to the heel). From a clinical point of view, we considered these patients as severely affected for the diagnostic group of pain disorder. Physical and technical examinations of the patients were performed by a neurologist and orthopedic surgeon to exclude any somatic cause of the pain syndrome. Most of the patients also participated in a recently published fMRI study (3).

Twenty-five healthy controls (medium age = 51.7 years; range = 32-60 years) were recruited and matched for age, gender, and handedness. These participants were healthy, had no chronic/ongoing pain, and did not fulfill criteria for any psychiatric diagnosis according to the DSM-IV criteria.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Inclusion Criteria for Pain Disorder

Inclusion criteria were female gender, right-hand preference according to the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (32), ages between 20 and 68 years, duration of clinical pain of at least 2 years, and diagnosis of pain disorder according to the DSM-IV.

The screening for somatoform symptoms (SOMS) was completed with the SOMS-2 questionnaire (33). It asks for the presence of 53 physical complaints lacking an organic disease during the previous 2 years and verifies further classification criteria with another 15 questions to be answered by the patient. The questionnaire includes all 33 physical complaints of the DSM-IV somatization disorder symptom list, the symptoms of International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10) somatization disorder, and the ICD-10 somatoform autonomic dysfunction symptom list. The DSM-IV somatization index is a central outcome sum score recruited by the single 33 DSM-IV items of the SOMS-2.

A further inclusion criterion was the report of a high affective dimension of the clinical pain syndrome as measured by the Pain Perception Scale (PPS) (34). This 24-item questionnaire describes the sensory and the affective qualities of pain in a “global affective score” and a “global sensory score.” It had proven to be a reliable and valid tool to measure the affective and sensory component of pain in various studies and is an essential part of the pain questionnaire of the German IASP chapter (DGSS). The cut-off value for the inclusion of patients into the study was set to a minimum of 40 points (maximum value = 56).

The patients were asked for the average clinical pain intensity of the last 4 weeks, using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) (0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Exclusion Criteria

We excluded patients with the diagnosis of fibromyalgia as characterized by chronic widespread pain (involving all four quadrants of the body as well as the axial skeleton) and diffuse tenderness for two reasons (35). First, there is an ongoing debate whether patients with fibromyalgia can also be diagnosed as pain disorder or whether fibromyalgia has to be regarded as a separate disease entity (30). Second, recent VBM findings in patients suffering from fibromyalgia already exist (12,13) and we wanted to cover a broader spectrum of pain disorder. Patients who were not able to stop their pain medication for at least 1 week were also excluded. We also excluded controls or patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signs of cerebral atrophy diagnosed by a neuroradiologist, who visually analyzed the MRI images.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Structured Clinical (Psychiatric) Interview for DSM-IV(SCID)

The occurrence of psychiatric disorders was assessed during a structured clinical (psychiatric) interview (SCID-I, German version) (31) by a consultant psychiatrist according to the DSM-IV criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). The SCID assesses current (last 4 weeks before interview) and lifetime psychiatric status for major Axis I psychiatric disorders, using the criteria which are in accordance with the DSM-IV.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

The BDI is a 21-item self-report instrument that measures cognitive and endogenous aspects of depression on a 4-point scale (range = 0-3). This questionnaire has undergone extensive reliability and validation studies (36).

Back to Top | Article Outline
MRI Acquisition Parameters

MRI sequences were acquired from every participant, using a 1.5-Tesla scanner (Siemens Magnetom Symphony, Erlangen, Germany). For VBM, a T1-weighted MPRAGE sequence with sagittal slices was used (160 slices; slice thickness = 1 mm; voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm3; flip angle = 15 degrees; field of view = 256 × 256 mm; TR = 8.9 ms; TE = 3.93 ms; TI = 800 ms). To exclude structural lesions, a FLAIR sequence with axial 6-mm slicing was used. No abnormal findings were detected in our investigated collective.

Back to Top | Article Outline
VBM—Preprocessing and Statistical Analysis

For preprocessing and statistical analysis, an extension toolbox named VBM2 (http://dbm.neuro.uni-jena.de/vbm) for the functional neuroimaging software SPM2 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm) was used. VBM2 applies an “optimized” protocol for preprocessing high-resolution anatomical images (37) and for statistical analysis using a hidden Markov random field model (38). We used study-specific prior probability maps for segmentation and stereotactic normalization to the MNI standardized reference space defined by the Montreal Neurological Institute (Montreal, Quebec, Canada), and applied a Gaussian kernel of 8 mm for smoothing.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Analyses of Global GM Volumes

Global volumes of GM, white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were derived from the nonnormalized segmented images as provided by SPM2 after the 1st segmentation process. A two-sided independent t test was performed with Prism 4 for Windows (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, California) to detect differences of GM volumes between the patient and control groups. Furthermore, we performed correlation analyses of GM volumes with subjects’ age, BDI score, intensity and duration of pain, using Prism 4.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Voxel-Based Analyses of GM Changes

We included only voxels with a GM value >0.2 (maximum value = 1) and greater than the WM and CSF values to analyze only voxels with sufficient GM and to avoid possible edge effects around the border between GM, WM, and CSF.

In a cross-sectional design, regional GM changes between patient and control groups were investigated using the voxel-by-voxel analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Age and BDI scores were included as nuisance variables to remove GM variance explained by age and depression. The problem of multiple comparisons on a voxel-wise whole brain level was handled by using the False-Discovery-Rate procedure (FDR) (39), which is a widely accepted approach for the analysis of neuroimaging data. Instead of controlling the chance of any false positives (as in Bonferroni or random field methods), FDR controls the expected proportion of false positives among suprathreshold voxels. The statistical significance threshold for the categorical comparisons of GM densities between patient and control collective was set to p < .05 corrected with FDR.

Within the patient group, regional GM density was analyzed for correlations with the SOMS score, the global affective score (PPS), as well as duration and intensity of pain. Again, we applied ANCOVA with age and BDI scores as nuisance variables. Additionally, we performed a correlation analysis of the BDI scores only with GM density to detect depression-related effects on GM alterations (hereby only age was used as nuisance variable). For all correlation analyses, the statistical significance threshold was set to p < .001 uncorrected.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Psychometric Variables

Demographic and psychometric variables of the study sample are shown in Table 1. The mean duration of clinical pain was 9.7 ± 8.2 (standard deviation) years. The mean intensity of clinical pain during the last 4 weeks was 8.8 ± 0.9 out of 10 on an NRS. The amount of depressive symptoms (BDI of patients: 21.6 ± 8.4 versus controls: 3.9 ± 3.5; p < .001) and the DSM-IV somatization index score (SOMS of patients: 6.4 ± 3.7 versus controls: 1.7 ± 1.3; p < .001) were significantly higher in patients than in controls. Accordingly, SCID-I interviews revealed comorbidity with current major depressive episodes in 7 of 14 patients.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Global Volumes

We found neither significant differences in global GM volumes between both groups nor significant correlations of clinical parameters with global GM volumes.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Regional GM Changes

Comparing patients against controls, VBM (depression and age included as nuisance variables) revealed decreases of GM density in the patient group in the prefrontal cortex, including the ventromedial prefrontal (VMPFC)/orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) as well as in the middle frontal and superior medial frontal cortex (p < .05 FDR corr.) (Figure 1, Table 2). Decreases were also observed in the anterior (ACC) and posterior (PCC) cingulate cortex, insular cortex, parahippocampal and inferior temporal cortex as well as in the cerebellum (p < .05 FDR corr.) (Figure 1, Table 2). Vice versa, no significant increase of GM density could be detected (p < .05 FDR corr. as well as p < .001 uncorr.).

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools
Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Correlations With Regional GM Changes

No correlations of the somatisation (SOMS), global affective (PPS) or clinical pain intensity scores with an increase or decrease of GM density on a voxel-wise whole-brain level were found. For regions of interest, such as VMPFC/OFC and ACC, no correlations of GM density alterations with the depression scores (BDI) were found.

The voxel-wise correlation analysis of GM density with the duration of clinical pain revealed a negative correlation in the left parahippocampal cortex (MNI coord. = −32 −17 −24; Z value = 3.82; p < .001 uncorr.) (Figure 2A), and a positive correlation in the right thalamus (MNI coord. = 19 −20 −2; Z value = 4.24; p < .001 uncorr.) (Figure 2B).

Figure 2
Figure 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

The combined results of DSM-IV diagnosis and specific questionnaires to further assess somatization (SOMS-2 and the pain perception scale) show that we included patients suffering from pain in more than one location and with a high affective pain quality. In these patients, our VBM study revealed significant GM decreases. The affected brain structures, such as the prefrontal cortex including the VMPFC/OFC, anterior, PCC and insular cortex, are known to be critically involved in pain processing (40) and play an important role in the amplification and exacerbation of the pain experience by mood and emotional state (41). The matrix of structural changes shows striking similarities with results of other VBM studies on patients with distinct types of chronic pain disorders, such as fibromyalgia (12,13), chronic tension type headache (42), and chronic back pain (14,15).

Although we found region-specific abnormalities similar to previous studies, there are also remarkable differences. Whereas Kuchinad et al. and Apkarian et al. observed age-related global GM decreases (13,14), we did not find such a decrease in our patient group. Most likely, this discrepancy may be attributed to our exclusion criteria, excluding any controls or patients with MRI signs of cerebral atrophy. Another difference to the other VBM studies is that half of our patient group fulfilled the DSM-IV criteria for an acute episode of major depression according to the SCID and showed elevated scores in the BDI. As there is evidence from the literature that depression is associated with GM decrease, preferentially in prefrontal areas (43–45), we included the BDI scores as nuisance variable in our analysis to exclude any GM changes related to depression. In a further step, we performed correlation analyses of BDI scores with global GM volumes as well as with region-specific GM densities of the VMPFC/OFC and ACC, to examine the influence of depression on GM changes. No correlation was revealed. Therefore, we conclude that the GM decrease observed in pain-processing structures of our study group represent a pathophysiological marker of pain disorder.

Back to Top | Article Outline
VMPFC/OFC

In a recent fMRI study, we evidenced an altered cerebral pain processing in patients with pain disorder and suggested a dysfunction in pain-processing structures (3). One of the main findings was a decreased pain-related activation of the VMPFC/OFC. It is very interesting that the observed functional changes overlap with GM decreases in almost identical parts of the VMPFC/OFC in this study. Other disorders, such as fibromyalgia or chronic tension-type headache, also exhibit structural changes in prefrontal regions (13,42). These findings underline the relevance of the VMPFC / OFC in the pathophysiology of pain disorder and more generally in functional somatic syndromes.

There is accumulating evidence from animal and functional neuroimaging studies that the cingulo-frontal area, including the rostral ACC and VMPFC/OFC, is involved in the processing and modulation of pain (46–51). These studies support the view of a top-down inhibitory or facilitatory capacity of the cingulo-frontal area which is involved in hypnosis, cognitive and emotional modulation of pain, placebo and opioid analgesia. Therefore, we speculate that the GM decrease in the cingulo-frontal area points to a defective pain regulation.

In addition, the VMPFC/OFC turned out to be the exclusive area in which hypoactivity remained even after withdrawal from long-term analgesics in patients with chronic analgesic-overuse headache evolving from episodic migraine, indicating a role in the maintenance of chronic pain (52).

An explanation for the GM decrease and the decreased functional activation of the VMPFC/OFC might be an abnormal brain chemistry as evidenced with MR spectroscopy in patients suffering from chronic back pain (53). However, further studies are needed, such as animal studies, to get a better understanding of what is behind GM-density decreases in VBM studies. The possibility should be considered that reduced GM volume/density may precede rather than follow the chronic pain.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Cingulate and Insular Cortex

Clusters of GM decrease were observed in the cingulate cortex and in the insular cortex. GM decreases with similar locations have been found in patients with fibromyalgia (13), chronic tension-type headache (42), and migraine (54). The ACC has neuroanatomical connections with the OFC, amygdala and periaquaeductal gray, structures known to be involved in the modulation of pain (inhibition/facilitation) (40,55). Regarding the anterior insular cortex, neuroanatomical connections to the limbic system (amygdala), prefrontal cortex (OFC/VMPFC), and temporal lobe have been described (56). In general, the ACC plays an important role in the evaluation, processing, and integration of sensory, motor, cognitive, and emotional aspects of pain (57–60). In our study, the GM decrease of this region might be related to the constantly increased pain experience in patients suffering from pain disorder.

The anterior insular cortex is important for linking emotions to cognitive processes and behavioral responses (61). It is also involved in aversive interoceptive processing, e.g., coding of pain intensity (62) and the processing of emotional-and memory-related aspects of pain (40,63). An extensive GM decrease of the insular cortex has been found in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (64). The authors assumed that this region is involved in the pathology of posttraumatic stress disorder and might relate to the cognitive deficits often found in these patients. Although we did not systematically evaluate cognitive functioning in our patients, cognitive deficits are not a typical hallmark of pain disorder and none of the patients had a previous diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia. We therefore suggest that the GM decrease in the cingulate and insular cortex is the consequence of a reorganization induced by the heightened activation level (3) of these areas in patients suffering from pain disorder.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Negative Correlation of Pain Duration With GM Density of the Parahippocampal Cortex

In the correlation analysis, we found that the GM density in the parahippocampal cortex is decreasing, the longer the pain syndrome continues. GM decreases of this region have been found mainly in stress-related disorders, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (64–67) or chronic fatigue syndrome (68,69). The involvement of the amygdala and the parahippocampal cortex in the processing of anxiety, fear, and aversive contents of pain has been demonstrated in several functional neuroimaging studies (70,71). Activation changes, especially of the hippocampal formation, were observed in healthy subjects when the pain sensation is accompanied by anxiety (72). Whether the permanent recall of memory contents related to anxiety or the disease progression itself may cause the GM decrease in this brain region remains an open question.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Positive Correlation of Pain Duration With GM Density of the Thalamus

Although there was no significant GM increase in the thalamus in the categorical analysis, we found a positive correlation of GM density with the duration of pain. Similar results were obtained in a VBM study investigating patients with chronic back pain, where structural changes with an increase in GM density were found in the thalamus (15). Moreover, in patients with esophageal dysfunction (73) and patients with chronic low back pain (74), increased pain-related thalamic responses were found. It was suggested that these responses are a sign of generalized hypervigilance to noxious stimuli. Thus, it may be speculated that long lasting hypervigilance to body signals may be the cause of the increasing GM density in the thalamus in our patient cohort.

Back to Top | Article Outline
General Considerations Regarding the Interpretation of the Study Results

A potential limitation of this study is related to the fact that, in 50% of our patient collective, a current major depressive episode was diagnosed. This is due to the fact that depression is an often observed psychiatric comorbidity in pain disorder (75). Although we controlled this effect using the BDI scores as nuisance variable, an alternative and probably more optimal approach would have been to investigate an additional control collective of patients suffering from major depressive disorder without pain disorder.

We discussed most of the GM changes in the patient cohort as being related to their clinical pain. However, it must be acknowledged that patients with a long history of pain and very high pain scores often reduce their exercise levels and therefore reduce their cognitive load, which is related to disability and underemployment. One might therefore argue that these factors could contribute to the brain differences observed.

However, the results of our study raise further important questions: Do the brain differences precede the onset of the chronic pain and are they hence a possible cause of pain disorder? There also remains the question of plasticity and reversibility of the observed changes. Future longitudinal studies will have to clarify whether the reduction in GM density recovers when the pain is reduced. First, VBM studies on the question of plasticity by Draganski et al. suggested that changes in GM density as measured by VBM might be (partly) reversible, as shown in training-induced VBM changes (76) and in experiments with repetitive pain stimulation (77). These points should set the stage for subsequent research into this important area.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSION

As far as the DSM-IV classification of pain disorder is concerned, experts have seen no adequate reason for classifying this disorder as a mental one (27,28). Obviously, a further proof of the important role of central changes in pain disorder is still needed. In some organ- or system-based functional somatic syndromes like fibromyalgia (12,13), chronic back pain (14,15), and chronic tension-type headache (42), recent VBM studies have already discovered structural central nervous changes. Pain disorder, in extension to these functional somatic syndromes, is a more generic diagnostic category not restricted to a specific organ- or system-based dysfunction.

Our results show that patients with pain disorder may also suffer from structural brain damage, which indeed is a core element of mental disorders. Thus, our study results argue in favor of a new category of general medical-mental interface disorders (29,30), comprising the whole group of functional somatic syndromes. This diagnostic approach would cover pathophysiological changes in the whole variety of functional somatic syndromes, which are to be found in the peripheral as well as in the central nervous system.

This work was supported by the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) of the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF).

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Waller E, Scheidt CE. Somatoform disorders as disorders of affect regulation: a development perspective. Int Rev Psychiatry 2006;18:13–24.

2. Meyer C, Rumpf HJ, Hapke U, Dilling H, John U. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in general adult population. Results of TACOS study. Nervenarzt 2000;71:535–42.

3. Gündel H, Valet M, Sorg C, Huber D, Zimmer C, Sprenger T, Tölle TR. Altered cerebral response to noxious heat stimulation in patients with somatoform pain disorder. Pain 2008;137:413–21.

4. Stoeter P, Bauermann T, Nickel R, Corluka L, Gawehn J, Vucurevic G, Vossel G, Egle UT. Cerebral activation in patients with somatoform pain disorder exposed to pain and stress: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2007;36:418–30.

5. Cook DB, Lange G, Ciccone DS, Liu WC, Steffener J, Natelson BH. Functional imaging of pain in patients with primary fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 2004;31:364–78.

6. Gracely RH, Petzke F, Wolf JM, Clauw DJ. Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence of augmented pain processing in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:1333–43.

7. Wik G, Fischer H, Finer B, Bragee B, Kristianson M, Fredrikson M. Retrospenial cortical deactivation during painful stimulation of fibromyalgic patients. Int J Neurosci 2006;116:1–8.

8. Giesecke T, Gracely RH, Grant MA, Nachemson A, Petzke F, Williams DA, Clauw DJ. Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:613–23.

9. Bonaz B, Baciu M, Papillon E, Bost R, Gueddah N, Le Bas JF, Fournet J, Segebarth C. Central processing of rectal pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: an fMRI study. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:654–61.

10. Kwan CL, Diamant NE, Pope G, Mikula K, Mikulis DJ, Davis KD. Abnormal forebrain activity in functional bowel disorder patients with chronic pain. Neurology 2005;65:1268–77.

11. Berman SM, Naliboff BD, Suyenobu B, Labus JS, Stains J, Ohning G, Kilpatrick L, Bueller JA, Ruby K, Jarcho J, Mayer EA. Reduced brainstem inhibition during anticipated pelvic visceral pain correlates with enhanced brain response to the visceral stimulus in women with irritable bowel syndrome. J Neurosci 2008;28:349–59.

12. Schmidt-Wilcke T, Luerding R, Weigand T, Jurgens T, Schuierer G, Leinisch E, Bogdahn U. Striatal grey matter increase in patients suffering from fibromyalgia—a voxel-based morphometry study. Pain 2007;132(Suppl 1):S109–S116.

13. Kuchinad A, Schweinhardt P, Seminowicz DA, Wood PB, Chizh BA, Bushnell MC. Accelerated brain gray matter loss in fibromyalgia patients: premature aging of the brain? J Neurosci 2007;27:4004–7.

14. Apkarian AV, Sosa Y, Sonty S, Levy RM, Harden RN, Parrish TB, Gitelman DR. Chronic back pain is associated with decreased prefrontal and thalamic gray matter density. J Neurosci 2004;24:10410–5.

15. Schmidt-Wilcke T, Leinisch E, Ganssbauer S, Draganski B, Bogdahn U, Altmeppen J, May A. Affective components and intensity of pain correlate with structural differences in gray matter in chronic back pain patients. Pain 2006;125:89–97.

16. Mechelli A, Price CJ, Friston KJ, Ashburner J. Voxel-based morphometry of the human brain: methods and applications. Curr Med Imaging Rev 2005;1:1–9.

17. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry—the methods. Neuroimage 2000;11:805–21.

18. Baron JC, Chetelat G, Desgranges B, Perchey G, Landeau B, de la Sayette V, Eustache F. In vivo mapping of gray matter loss with voxel-based morphometry in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 2001;14:298–309.

19. Muhlau M, Weindl A, Wohlschlager AM, Gaser C, Stadtler M, Valet M, Zimmer C, Kassubek J, Peinemann A. Voxel-based morphometry indicates relative preservation of the limbic prefrontal cortex in early Huntington disease. J Neural Transm 2007;114:367–72.

20. Burton EJ, McKeith IG, Burn DJ, Williams ED, O’Brien JT. Cerebral atrophy in Parkinson’s disease with and without dementia: a comparison with Alzheimer’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies and controls. Brain 2004;127:791–800.

21. Saykin AJ, Wishart HA, Rabin LA, Santulli RB, Flashman LA, West JD, McHugh TL, Mamourian AC. Older adults with cognitive complaints show brain atrophy similar to that of amnestic MCI. Neurology 2006;67:834–42.

22. Minnerop M, Specht K, Ruhlmann J, Schimke N, Abele M, Weyer A, Wullner U, Klockgether T. Voxel-based morphometry and voxel-based relaxometry in multiple system atrophy—a comparison between clinical subtypes and correlations with clinical parameters. Neuroimage 2007;36:1086–95.

23. Maguire EA, Gadian DG, Johnsrude IS, Good CD, Ashburner J, Frackowiak RS, Frith CD. Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:4398–403.

24. Gaser C, Schlaug G. Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. J Neurosci 2003;23:9240–5.

25. Mechelli A, Crinion JT, Noppeney U, O’Doherty J, Ashburner J, Frackowiak RS, Price CJ. Neurolinguistics: structural plasticity in the bilingual brain. Nature 2004;431:757.

26. Ilg R, Wohlschlager AM, Gaser C, Liebau Y, Dauner R, Woller A, Zimmer C, Zihl J, Muhlau M. Gray matter increase induced by practice correlates with task-specific activation: a combined functional and morphometric magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 2008;28:4210–5.

27. Kroenke K, Sharpe M, Sykes R. Revising the classification of somatoform disorders: key questions and preliminary recommendations. Psychosomatics 2007;48:277–85.

28. Sykes R. Somatoform disorders in DSM-IV: mental or physical disorders? J Psychosom Res 2006;60:341–4.

29. Strassnig M, Stowell KR, First MB, Pincus HA. General medical and psychiatric perspectives on somatoform disorders: separated by an uncommon language. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2006;19:194–200.

30. Henningsen P, Zipfel S, Herzog W. Management of functional somatic syndromes. Lancet 2007;369:946–55.

31. Wittchen HU, Wunderlich U, Gruschwitz S, Zaudig M. Strukturiertes klinisches Interview für DSM-IV, Achse I (SKID). Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag; 1997.

32. Edinburgh. Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97–113.

33. Rief W, Hiller W, Heuser J. Das Screening für somatoforme Störungen (SOMS—the screening for somatoform disorders)—Manual zum Fragebogen. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber; 1997.

34. Geissner E. The pain perception scale—a differentiated and change-sensitive scale for assessing chronic and acute pain. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 1995;34:XXXV–XLIII.

35. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C, Goldenberg DL, Tugwell P, Campbell SM, Abeles M, Clark P, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria for the Classification of Fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:160–72. Comment in Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1863–4; Arthritis Rheum 1991;34:128.

36. Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck depression inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 1998;8:77–100.

37. Good CD, Johnsrude IS, Ashburner J, Henson RN, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS. A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 2001;14:21–36.

38. Cuadra MB, Cammoun L, Butz T, Cuisenaire O, Thiran JP. Comparison and validation of tissue modelization and statistical classification methods in T1-weighted MR brain images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:1548–65.

39. Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 2002;15:870–8.

40. Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Treede RD, Zubieta JK. Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur J Pain 2005;9:463–84.

41. Tracey I, Mantyh PW. The cerebral signature for pain perception and its modulation. Neuron 2007;55:377–91.

42. Schmidt-Wilcke T, Leinisch E, Straube A, Kampfe N, Draganski B, Diener HC, Bogdahn U, May A. Gray matter decrease in patients with chronic tension type headache. Neurology 2005;65:1483–6.

43. Taki Y, Kinomura S, Awata S, Inoue K, Sato K, Ito H, Goto R, Uchida S, Tsuji I, Arai H, Kawashima R, Fukuda H. Male elderly subthreshold depression patients have smaller volume of medial part of prefrontal cortex and precentral gyrus compared with age-matched normal subjects: a voxel-based morphometry. J Affect Disord 2005;88:313–20.

44. Nugent AC, Milham MP, Bain EE, Mah L, Cannon DM, Marrett S, Zarate CA, Pine DS, Price JL, Drevets WC. Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder investigated with MRI and voxel-based morphometry. Neuroimage 2006;30:485–97.

45. Yoshikawa E, Matsuoka Y, Yamasue H, Inagaki M, Nakano T, Akechi T, Kobayakawa M, Fujimori M, Nakaya N, Akizuki N, Imoto S, Murakami K, Kasai K, Uchitomi Y. Prefrontal cortex and amygdala volume in first minor or major depressive episode after cancer diagnosis. Biol Psychiatry 2006;59:707–12.

46. Valet M, Sprenger T, Boecker H, Willoch F, Rummeny E, Conrad B, Erhard P, Tolle TR. Distraction modulates connectivity of the cingulo-frontal cortex and the midbrain during pain—an fMRI analysis. Pain 2004;109:399–408.

47. Sprenger T, Valet M, Boecker H, Henriksen G, Spilker ME, Willoch F, Wagner KJ, Wester HJ, Tolle TR. Opioidergic activation in the medial pain system after heat pain. Pain 2006;122:63–7.

48. Petrovic P, Ingvar M. Imaging cognitive modulation of pain processing. Pain 2002;95:1–5.

49. Petrovic P, Kalso E, Petersson KM, Ingvar M. Placebo and opioid analgesia—imaging a shared neuronal network. Science 2002;295:1737–40.

50. Faymonville ME, Laureys S, Degueldre C, DelFiore G, Luxen A, Franck G, Lamy M, Maquet P. Neural mechanisms of antinociceptive effects of hypnosis. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1257–67.

51. Seminowicz DA, Davis KD. Cortical responses to pain in healthy individuals depends on pain catastrophizing. Pain 2006;120:297–306.

52. Fumal A, Laureys S, Di Clemente L, Boly M, Bohotin V, Vandenheede M, Coppola G, Salmon E, Kupers R, Schoenen J. Orbitofrontal cortex involvement in chronic analgesic-overuse headache evolving from episodic migraine. Brain 2006;129:543–50.

53. Grachev ID, Fredrickson BE, Apkarian AV. Abnormal brain chemistry in chronic back pain: an in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Pain 2000;89:7–18.

54. Schmidt-Wilcke T, Ganssbauer S, Neuner T, Bogdahn U, May A. Subtle grey matter changes between migraine patients and healthy controls. Cephalalgia 2007.

55. Devinsky O, Morrell MJ, Vogt BA. Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain 1995;118(Pt 1):279–306.

56. Augustine JR. Circuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1996;22:229–44.

57. Derbyshire SW, Vogt BA, Jones AK. Pain and Stroop interference tasks activate separate processing modules in anterior cingulate cortex. Exp Brain Res 1998;118:52–60.

58. Peyron R, Garcia-Larrea L, Gregoire MC, Costes N, Convers P, Lavenne F, Mauguiere F, Michel D, Laurent B. Haemodynamic brain responses to acute pain in humans: sensory and attentional networks. Brain 1999;122:1765–80.

59. Rainville P, Duncan GH, Price DD, Carrier B, Bushnell MC. Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science 1997;277:968–71.

60. Tölle TR, Kaufmann T, Siessmeier T, Lautenbacher S, Berthele A, Munz F, Zieglgansberger W, Willoch F, Schwaiger M, Conrad B, Bartenstein P. Region-specific encoding of sensory and affective components of pain in the human brain: a positron emission tomography correlation analysis. Ann Neurol 1999;45:40–7.

61. Nitschke JB, Sarinopoulos I, Mackiewicz KL, Schaefer HS, Davidson RJ. Functional neuroanatomy of aversion and its anticipation. Neuroimage 2006;29:106–16.

62. Craig AD, Chen K, Bandy D, Reiman EM. Thermosensory activation of insular cortex. Nat Neurosci 2000;3:184–90.

63. Singer T, Seymour B, O’Doherty J, Kaube H, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 2004;303:1157–62.

64. Chen S, Xia W, Li L, Liu J, He Z, Zhang Z, Yan L, Zhang J, Hu D. Gray matter density reduction in the insula in fire survivors with posttraumatic stress disorder: a voxel-based morphometric study. Psychiatry Res 2006;146:65–72.

65. Villarreal G, Hamilton DA, Petropoulos H, Driscoll I, Rowland LM, Griego JA, Kodituwakku PW, Hart BL, Escalona R, Brooks WM. Reduced hippocampal volume and total white matter volume in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2002;52:119–25.

66. Yamasue H, Kasai K, Iwanami A, Ohtani T, Yamada H, Abe O, Kuroki N, Fukuda R, Tochigi M, Furukawa S, Sadamatsu M, Sasaki T, Aoki S, Ohtomo K, Asukai N, Kato N. Voxel-based analysis of MRI reveals anterior cingulate gray-matter volume reduction in posttraumatic stress disorder due to terrorism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:9039–43.

67. Emdad R, Bonekamp D, Sondergaard HP, Bjorklund T, Agartz I, Ingvar M, Theorell T. Morphometric and psychometric comparisons between non-substance-abusing patients with posttraumatic stress disorder and normal controls. Psychother Psychosom 2006;75:122–32.

68. Okada T, Tanaka M, Kuratsune H, Watanabe Y, Sadato N. Mechanisms underlying fatigue: a voxel-based morphometric study of chronic fatigue syndrome. BMC Neurology 2004;4:14.

69. de Lange FP, Kalkman JS, Bleijenberg G, Hagoort P, van der Meer JW, Toni I. Gray matter volume reduction in the chronic fatigue syndrome. Neuroimage 2005;26:777–81.

70. Buchel C, Dolan RJ, Armony JL, Friston KJ. Amygdala-hippocampal involvement in human aversive trace conditioning revealed through event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 1999;19:10869–76.

71. Geuze E, Westenberg HG, Jochims A, de Kloet CS, Bohus M, Vermetten E, Schmahl C. Altered pain processing in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007;64:76–85.

72. Ploghaus A, Narain C, Beckmann CF, Clare S, Bantick S, Wise R, Matthews PM, Rawlins JN, Tracey I. Exacerbation of pain by anxiety is associated with activity in a hippocampal network. J Neurosci 2001;21:9896–903.

73. Hobson AR, Aziz Q. Brain processing of esophageal sensation in health and disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2004;33:69–91.

74. Derbyshire SW, Jones AK, Creed F, Starz T, Meltzer CC, Townsend DW, Peterson AM, Firestone L. Cerebral responses to noxious thermal stimulation in chronic low back pain patients and normal controls. Neuroimage 2002;16:158–68.

75. Frohlich C, Jacobi F, Wittchen HU. DSM-IV pain disorder in the general population. An exploration of the structure and threshold of medically unexplained pain symptoms. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2006;256:187–96.

76. Draganski B, Gaser C, Busch V, Schuierer G, Bogdahn U, May A. Neuroplasticity: changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature 2004;427:311–2.

77. Teutsch S, Herken W, Bingel U, Schoell E, May A. Changes in brain gray matter due to repetitive painful stimulation. Neuroimage 2008;42:845–9. Epub 2008 Jul 7.

Keywords:

pain disorder; idiopathic chronic pain; voxel-based morphometry; orbitofrontal cortex; ventromedial prefrontal cortex; classification

Copyright © 2009 by American Psychosomatic Society

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.