Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections Podcasts For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > September/October 2005 - Volume 67 - Issue 5 > The Development of Persistent Pain and Psychological Morbidi...
Psychosomatic Medicine:
Review

The Development of Persistent Pain and Psychological Morbidity After Motor Vehicle Collision: Integrating the Potential Role of Stress Response Systems Into a Biopsychosocial Model

McLean, Samuel A. MD; Clauw, Daniel J. MD; Abelson, James L. MD, PhD; Liberzon, Israel MD

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

From the Departments of Emergency Medicine (S.A.M.), Medicine (Rheumatology) (D.J.C.), and Psychiatry (I.L., J.L.A.) and the Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center (S.A.M., D.J.C.), University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Samuel A. McLean, MD, University of Michigan Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, PO Box 385, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. E-mail: samclean@umich.edu

Received for publication August 11, 2004; revision received April 15, 2005.

Funding for this study was provided by the National Institutes of Health Grant K12 RR017607-01 (to S.A.M.), Department of Army Grant DAMD-17002-0018 (to D.J.C.), National Institutes of Health Grant R01 MH52724-06 (to J.L.A.), and National Institutes of Health Grant R01 MH63092 (I.L.).

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objectives: Persistent pain and psychological sequelae are common after motor vehicle collision (MVC), but their etiology remains poorly understood. Such common sequelae include whiplash-associated disorders (WAD), fibromyalgia, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Increasing evidence suggests that these disorders share overlapping epidemiologic and clinical features. A model is proposed in which central neurobiological systems, including physiologic systems and neuroanatomical structures involved in the stress response, are an important substrate for the development of all 3 disorders and interact with psychosocial and other factors to influence chronic symptom development.

Methods: Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics regarding the development of these disorders after MVC are reviewed. Evidence suggesting a role for stress response systems in the development of these disorders is presented.

Results: Contemporary evidence supports a model of chronic symptom development that incorporates the potential for interactions between past experience, acute stress responses to trauma, post-MVC behavior, and cognitive/psychosocial consequences to alter activity within brain regions which process pain and to result in persistent pain, as well as psychological sequelae, after MVC. Such a model incorporates factors identified in prior biopsychosocial theories and places them in the landscape of our rapidly developing understanding of stress systems and CNS pain-modulating pathways.

Conclusion: New models are needed to stimulate deeper examination of the interacting influences of initial tissue damage, acute pain, psychosocial contingencies, and central stress pathways during chronic symptom development after MVC. Deeper understanding could contribute to improved treatment approaches to reduce the immense personal and societal burdens of common trauma-related disorders.

CRH = corticotrophin-releasing hormone; MVC = motor vehicle collision; WAD = whiplash-associated disorders; PTSD = posttraumatic stress disorder; HPA = hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; LC/NE=locus ceruleus/norepinephrine-sympathetic.

Back to Top | Article Outline

INTRODUCTION

Among survivors of motor vehicle collision (MVC), persistent symptoms are common even after “minor” collisions and result in tremendous patient suffering and societal costs (1–4). These symptoms often present as psychological disorders, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (2,3). However, a substantial portion of post-MVC morbidity also involves chronic pain syndromes. Whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) are the prototypical MVC-related pain disorders, but fibromyalgia, with its more widespread pain, can also be triggered by MVC (5). For each of these disorders, the transition from acute injury to chronic illness remains poorly understood.

During the past 2 decades, considerable advances have been made in developing biopsychosocial models to describe the transition from acute injury to chronic pain. These advances utilized novel conceptualizations of cognitive-behavioral factors, such as pain-related fear and avoidance (6), which appear to influence the development of chronic pain in many individuals. The cyclical process whereby pain produces fear, which leads to behavioral avoidance, inactivity, disability, and increased focus on pain avoidance, is well-described in the Vlaeyen’s model of chronic pain pathogenesis (6) (Figure 1). In a recent amendment of this model, Norton and Asmundson (7) emphasized the importance of physiologic activities that increase pain (eg, via increased muscle tension) and augment normal physiologic processes (eg, cause increased heart rate), which are then interpreted catastrophically. This later concept is rooted in an extensive literature on a cognitive etiology for panic disorder (catastrophic misinterpretation of bodily sensations) (8).

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools

The ability of psychological factors to influence the development of chronic pain by shaping behavior and amplifying peripheral sensations, as highlighted in these models, is well supported by considerable research (6,7). However, there is increasing evidence that specific neurobiological mechanisms within central stress systems may participate in this process, derailing recovery and mediating progression to chronicity. These mechanisms have been most thoroughly examined in studies of PTSD but may be equally relevant to the development of chronic pain syndromes. Indeed, evidence suggests that PTSD and chronic pain disorders after trauma have many common links. The objective of this review is to examine available evidence that centrally controlled stress response systems can influence the development of all three conditions—WAD, fibromyalgia, and PTSD—after MVC and to suggest that insights from the PTSD literature may enhance our understanding of the development of WAD and fibromyalgia after MVC. An expanded biopsychosocial model for the development of posttraumatic pain syndromes is proposed that emphasizes the importance of interactions between central neurobiological processes and identified cognitive-behavioral factors during their development.

Back to Top | Article Outline

WAD, FIBROMYALGIA, AND PTSD AFTER MVC

WAD are common after MVC, with symptoms that include pain in the neck, shoulder, or arm; headache; jaw pain; dizziness; tinnitus; and cognitive difficulties (9). Although some consider whiplash to be biomechanical in etiology (10), there is ample evidence that in many individuals WAD is not caused by biomechanical mechanisms alone. First, there is great variation in the prevalence of WAD among different populations (eg, high in North America (1) but very low in Greece (11)). Second, decreasing the financial benefit of developing whiplash syndrome improves WAD outcomes. The incidence of WAD decreased as much as 40% in Saskatchewan, Canada, when the providence changed from a tort-compensation system to a no-fault system (1). Third, collisions that occur in other settings (eg, in bumper cars) exert the same biomechanical stress as a low-speed MVC (12), yet prolonged WAD after bumper car collisions are rare (13). Fourth, there is no clear “dose effect” between trauma intensity and the likelihood of developing WAD (14,15). Although the severity of initial symptoms is an important predictor of chronic pain (15–17), the assumption that initial symptoms are proportional to initial tissue injury has not been validated. In an interesting experimental approach to this issue, Castro et al. (18) exposed patients to a “sham” rear-end collision. Twenty percent of subjects reported whiplash symptoms 3 days later, despite no actual collision.

Fibromyalgia is a common clinical syndrome defined by the presence of chronic widespread pain and tenderness (19) Fibromyalgia also occurs as a sequela of MVC, although its MVC-related incidence rate is less well defined. An anecdotal association between MVC and fibromyalgia symptom onset has long been reported: between 24% and 47% of fibromyalgia patients report that an MVC triggered the onset of their illness (20,21). A recent prospective, multisite study of fibromyalgia development after MVC found that among 224 subjects reporting neck pain after MVC, 3% developed fibromyalgia, as opposed to only 0.4% of 643 patients presenting to the emergency department for treatment of (non–MVC- related) minor laceration (5). The unadjusted relative risk of developing fibromyalgia among those initially presenting with neck pain after MVC versus those with laceration was 8.4. The cumulative direct and indirect evidence for a causal relationship between MVC and fibromyalgia exceeds that of other rheumatologic conditions for which an environmental trigger has been accepted (22).

PTSD, the prototypical stress-related disorder, is also common after MVC. To meet criteria for the diagnosis of PTSD, an individual must have 3 distinct types of symptoms related to the MVC event for at least 1 month: reexperiencing the event (eg, psychological distress on exposure to reminders), avoidance of reminders of the event, and hyperarousal (23). Multiple studies suggest that 10% to 16% of patients presenting to the emergency department after MVC will have PTSD 1 year later (2–4). As described below, there is increasing evidence that dysregulation within central stress response systems may play a critical role in the development of PTSD.

Back to Top | Article Outline

THE STRESS RESPONSE SYSTEM AND ITS PUTATIVE ROLE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PTSD AFTER MVC

Multiple mechanisms have been proposed by which abnormal stress system function during or after a stressor might increase the risk of PTSD development by disrupting the neurobiological processes which orchestrate an adaptive stress response. Acute stressors trigger the release of corticotrophin-releasing factor, which initiates the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis and is a modulatory neurotransmitter within the locus ceruleus/norepinephrine-sympathetic (LC/NE) system, shaping the release of cortisol and epinephrine (24). These and other factors both help optimize one’s ability to respond to the stressor and, importantly, modulate remembering of the event (“memory consolidation”) (25). Pitman hypothesized that an exaggerated stress response (increased catecholamines and other neuropeptides) might lead to “overconsolidated memories” contributing to the development of PTSD (26). Consistent with this theory, increased heart rate after MVC (reflecting increased sympathomimetic response) has been found to predict the later development of PTSD (27–29). In addition, 2 recent preliminary studies have found that a pharmacologic intervention (propranolol) provided in the emergency department to attenuate the sympathomimetic response decreases the development of PTSD symptoms (30,31). Randomized controlled trials of this intervention are currently ongoing.

Cortisol enhances memory consolidation for emotionally adverse experiences (32), and thus increased cortisol levels after a stressor might be expected to increase the risk of PTSD development. Consistent with this, increased cortisol levels have been found to increase the risk of PTSD in children experiencing MVC (33). However, cortisol also inhibits memory retrieval (32,34), which may help prevent recurrent recollections of the traumatic event (memory reinforcement) during the postevent period, limiting memory formation and stress system activation (26). In addition, cortisol helps contain the acute stress response by down-regulating adrenergic hormone release (35), which might also indirectly contribute to PTSD prevention (36). Three studies of cortisol response in adults after MVC have found that low cortisol levels increase PTSD risk (37–39). In addition, 2 randomized controlled trials have found that hydrocortisone administration in the intensive care unit during stressful events (cardiac surgery and sepsis) decreases subsequent PTSD development (40,41). In summary, although there are conflicting data and disagreements within the field about the precise role of cortisol as a risk factor for PTSD, it does seem clear that HPA axis function, like LC/NE system function, is an important factor in creating or identifying vulnerability and/or in shaping the progression of this stress disorder.

Back to Top | Article Outline

THE POSSIBLE ROLE OF STRESS RESPONSE SYSTEMS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PERSISTENT PAIN AFTER MVC

As described above, the possible role of stress response systems in the development of PTSD after stressful events continues to be extensively examined. However, the possible role of stress systems in the development of persistent pain after MVC has not been considered, and the possible mechanisms by which stress systems may interact with cognitive-behavioral factors and provide a common substrate for the production of both persistent pain and psychological sequelae have not been explored.

Multiple lines of evidence support the hypothesis that stress response systems are involved in the pathogenesis of chronic pain, as well as psychological sequelae after MVC: (1) WAD, PTSD, and fibromyalgia have overlapping epidemiologic and clinical features (see below); (2) there is a close association between PTSD symptoms and pain symptoms after MVC, beginning soon after the collision, in those developing WAD (42,43); (3) like PTSD, chronic pain syndromes (such as fibromyalgia (44,45)) developing after MVC are characterized by stress system dysregulation; and (4) stress systems are capable of influencing pain processing (see below). Stress systems may contribute to pain development through multiple mechanisms, including via the initial stress response to the collision and associated injuries and via behavioral changes that occur after the collision.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Overlapping Clinical and Epidemiologic Features of WAD, PTSD, and Fibromyalgia

Fibromyalgia, PTSD, and WAD have overlapping clinical and epidemiologic characteristics. Female gender (1,15–17, 46,47), lower socioeconomic status (1,48,49), and a preexisting history of mood disorders (18,46,47,50) increase the risk of developing all 3 conditions. All are characterized by multisystem complaints, such as headache, axial pain, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and sleep disturbances (46,51,52).

PTSD commonly co-occurs with fibromyalgia and WAD. Clinically significant PTSD-like symptoms have been found in more than 50% of fibromyalgia patients (21,53) and in more than 50% of patients receiving treatment for chronic pain after MVC (54,55). At least 15% to 25% of patients with persistent whiplash symptoms meet diagnostic criteria for PTSD (56,57). Also, just as PTSD is common in patients with chronic pain, chronic pain is also common in patients with PTSD. Twenty percent to 30% of outpatient samples with PTSD (58–60) and 80% of combat veterans with PTSD (59) also have chronic pain. Recent epidemiologic studies have also established genetic linkage between fibromyalgia, PTSD, and other “affective spectrum” disorders (61).

Sexual abuse is the most common cause of PTSD in women (62), and a history of previous trauma or child abuse increases the risk of developing PTSD after a traumatic event (38,63). Fibromyalgia populations report an increased prevalence of child abuse; 50% or more of tertiary care clinic populations report such a history (64–66). Child abuse can cause permanent stress system dysregulation (67), and such dysregulation may render abuse victims more vulnerable to subsequently developing fibromyalgia or WAD after MVC or other stressors. Recent animal studies have confirmed that early life stress can permanently alter nociceptive circuitry (68,69). The prevalence of self-reported child abuse among community-based samples of fibromyalgia patients who report the onset of chronic pain after MVC is unknown, as is the prevalence of child abuse among patients with WAD. The above data suggest the testable hypothesis that such prevalence rates are higher than those of the general population.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Association Between PTSD Symptoms and WAD Symptoms During WAD Development

Most studies examining the relationship between chronic pain and PTSD are cross-sectional and thus cannot provide information on the relative timing of pain and PTSD symptoms after MVC. Available evidence suggests that pain and PTSD symptoms are closely associated, beginning soon after MVC (42,43,70). In addition, PTSD symptoms after MVC have been shown to predict the development of chronic WAD. Drottning (43) found that increased PTSD symptoms within 1 to 2 days of the MVC were found in 70% of patients with significant neck pain 4 weeks after MVC as opposed to only 26% of those in the low pain group. Sterling et al. (42) found that elevated Impact of Event Scale scores (which reflect PTSD symptomatology) within 1 month of MVC were unique to those with moderate or severe WAD at 6 months. A recent study by Sterling et al. (71) also found that PTSD symptoms after MVC predicted whiplash severity at 6 months. These data suggest that evidence of vulnerability to PTSD in the immediate aftermath of a MVC predicts subsequent development of chronic WAD. Evidence that a subset of those with neck pain after MVC progresses to develop fibromyalgia (72) suggests that WAD and FM may be linked and that vulnerability to develop PTSD after MVC may also predict the development of fibromyalgia. These data suggest the testable hypothesis that factors which predict vulnerability to PTSD in prospective studies will also predict vulnerability to WAD and fibromyalgia.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Like PTSD, Fibromyalgia Developing After MVC Is Characterized by Stress System Dysregulation

A comprehensive review of the complex and heterogeneous literature regarding stress system findings in PTSD and fibromyalgia is beyond the scope of this review. However, abnormal stress system function is an important feature of both disorders (44,73). Though specifics have varied across studies and there have been conflicting findings, the preponderance of evidence suggests that the HPA axis is dysregulated in patients with PTSD (73,74). Both excessive and reduced HPA axis activity has been seen (74). Increased cerebrospinal fluid corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH), blunted ACTH responses to CRH, low baseline cortisol levels, and altered cortisol responses to acute stressors have all been reported (73,74) in PTSD. LC/NE system dysregulation is also present in PTSD, with a heightened catecholamine and autonomic response to stressors (75). Like PTSD, HPA axis findings in fibromyalgia have also been inconsistent, with both hyper- and hypoactivity noted (76). Also like PTSD, heightened autonomic reactivity (reflected in both heart rate variability and plasma catecholamine levels) has been observed in fibromyalgia and suggests a central hypernoradrenergic state (77,78).

Neuroanatomical work in PTSD suggests dysregulation in limbic, paralimbic, and prefrontal regions, many of which are involved in the stress response and emotional processing (79). Considerable interest has focused on prefrontal circuitry, which is responsible for the modulation of emotional responses, and amygdaloid regions, which are important in processing fear and emotional salience (79). An emerging hypothesis suggests that decreased prefrontal inhibition of amygdaloid and/or hypothalamic activity may contribute to altered HPA function, autonomic/adrenergic hyperactivity, and the generation of some PTSD symptoms (80). Intriguingly, abnormal prefrontal function has also been associated with pain catastrophization (81), which is associated with the development of chronic musculoskeletal pain (82). Future research is warranted to explore the possibility that prefrontal dysregulation, in some cases rooted in early life stress, may contribute to vulnerability to and manifestations of both PTSD and poststress pain syndromes by permissively contributing to the dysregulation of subcortical neuroendocrine, autonomic, emotional, and pain processing centers.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Stress Systems Are Capable of Influencing Pain Processing

In animal studies, prefrontal cortical regions are capable of influencing widespread pain sensitivity via their influence on descending pain modulatory pathways (83). These pathways can either inhibit or facilitate the spinal transmission of both noxious and nonnoxious stimuli (84) via opioid and nonopioid mechanisms (85). In addition, the laterocapsular division of the central nucleus of the amygdala also appears to play an important role in pain modulation (86). This area, which has been described as the “nociceptive amygdala,” is capable of either enhancing or suppressing painful stimuli (86) and may be critical to the development of chronic pain after MVC in some patients.

The possible dysregulation of descending pain modulating pathways in poststress pain states is suggested by the early onset and widespread nature of the hyperalgesia, which develops soon after MVC (70,87) in some patients who develop chronic WAD (31). Patients with WAD have been found to have the same widespread hypersensitivity to sensory stimulation as patients with fibromyalgia (88), and considerable data in fibromyalgia suggest that antinociceptive pathways are hypoactive in this condition (89–93). Recently, evidence of abnormal function of antinociceptive pain pathways has been identified in individuals developing chronic WAD, beginning soon after the MVC (94).

Although contemporary evidence most strongly suggests that stress systems influence post-MVC pain development via descending pain modulatory pathways, stress systems are also capable of modulating pain via other mechanisms, such as via spinal cord dorsal horn glucocorticoid receptors. Such receptors respond to peripheral nociceptive stimulation (95,96) and are capable of inducing antinociception (97–99). Cortisol variation may also influence the balance of peripheral proinflammatory cytokines, which might contribute to pain symptoms via peripheral or central mechanisms (100).

Back to Top | Article Outline

CANDIDATE NEUROBIOLOGICAL PROCESSES INVOLVED IN THE RESOLUTION OR PERSISTENCE OF SYMPTOMS AFTER MVC

Given the linkages described above between trauma, stress, PTSD, fibromyalgia, and WAD, it seems logical to wonder whether the acute stress response factors that mark or create vulnerability to PTSD may also contribute to vulnerability to develop chronic pain. No studies have examined the importance of stress response systems and their acute reactivity in the development of chronic pain after MVC. We might hypothesize that heightened acute autonomic activity and variations in HPA axis activity after MVC would predict an increased likelihood of subsequently developing WAD and fibromyalgia.

Stress response system dysregulation after MVC would then interact with cognitive-behavioral factors, such as avoidance learning, to further modulate neurobiological systems related to pain processing and stress. Consistent with this hypothesis, recent studies indicate that cognitive-behavioral factors alter pain perception and other symptoms via central neurobiological pathways (81,101). Such evidence supports a model of chronic symptom development that incorporates the potential for interactions between past experience, acute stress responses to trauma, post-MVC behavior, and cognitive/psychosocial consequences to alter activity within pain-sensitive brain regions and affect pain, as well as other psychological experiences (Figure 2). This model also suggests that, in many individuals, the dysregulation of neurobiological processes related to stress systems in the early aftermath of trauma may be a critical step in chronic pain development. If posttraumatic pain syndromes are similar to PTSD in this regard, there may be value in testing the ability of agents like propranolol or hydrocortisone, delivered in the immediate aftermath of trauma, to prevent the development of chronic pain.

Figure 2
Figure 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

POSSIBLE NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS MEDIATING KNOWN ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS FOR CHRONIC PAIN DEVELOPMENT

The utility of an interactive model incorporating neurobiological and cognitive-behavioral factors can be further illustrated by considering one post-event factor known to influence individual outcomes: decreased activity level. Decreased activity after MVC increases the risk of WAD (102), but the mechanisms by which decreased activity influences nociceptive processing are unknown. Results from a recent study suggest that depriving normally exercising individuals of routine exercise (as may occur if an individual reduces activity after MVC) may lead to symptoms such as pain, fatigue, and mood disturbances and that stress response system function may identify those individuals particularly vulnerable to the development of such symptoms (103). After 1 week of exercise cessation, 8 of 18 subjects developed worsening pain, tenderness, fatigue, or mood symptoms. These 8 subjects had significantly reduced baseline HPA axis activity (mean AM cortisol 27.42 μg/dl versus 37.97 μg/dl) and autonomic nervous system function (heart rate variability assessed using total power 7662 m/s2 versus 13,929 m/s2) relative to subjects who did not develop such symptoms.

These data support the hypothesis that stress system activity, shaped by genetic or experiential factors, predicts vulnerabilities to develop altered mood and pain experiences in the setting of reduced activity. This has relevance to the potential contribution of reduced activity following MVC to the development of chronic pain and suggests that reduced activity may also increase the risk of developing psychological sequelae. In addition, these data indicate that a full explanation of the link between decreased activity and chronic pain development may require a model that incorporates meaningful interactions between stress response systems, behavior, and central pain processing pathways.

These data also suggest a mechanism whereby interactions between central neurobiological pain processing systems and stress response systems may contribute to cultural variations in WAD prevalence via both MVC-related and post-MVC-related factors. There are cultural differences in the expected consequences of whiplash injury (104), and in those cultures in which more chronic sequelae are expected, the MCV event itself may be more likely to result in an exaggerated and/or poorly modulated stress response, which in vulnerable individuals may lead to persistent pain and/or psychological symptoms. In addition, individuals in countries where the perceived threat of MVC is high may also be more likely to decrease their activity level after an MVC (eg, “rest up” after the injury), which also may contribute to symptom development in vulnerable individuals via central neurobiological processes. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and in fact may often occur together and be synergistic.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, a number of lines of evidence suggest that central neurobiological processes, such as those related to stress response systems and central pain processing, may be important to the development of persistent pain and psychological sequelae after MVC. We propose a model in which the acute physical and emotional effects of MVC involve an interaction between the direct effects of tissue injury and the emotional responses to the experienced threat. This emotional response to threat includes the response to the MVC itself, as well as the response to associated injuries and symptoms after the MVC. These physical and emotional effects interact with an acute stress response that has been shaped by genetics and prior traumatic experience. Together, these influences in turn interact with central processing pathways, including those related to pain, that are highly sensitive to cognitive and emotional modulatory input. Amplified pain signaling may result, which may then interact with post-MVC behaviors to produce further amplification and reverberating activity that becomes self-sustaining.

This model incorporates all of the relevant factors identified in prior biopsychosocial theories of chronic pain development after injury and places them in the landscape of our rapidly developing understanding of stress systems and CNS pain-modulating pathways. It should be useful in shaping further studies of chronic symptom development after MVC, as it generates numerous specific, testable hypotheses. Longitudinal studies will be needed to test some of these hypotheses and to examine the influence of central factors in the development of chronic WAD, fibromyalgia, and PTSD among unselected patient cohorts. Examining these factors longitudinally will allow evaluation of the mechanisms that are likely to directly mediate chronic symptom development. Such studies should simultaneously examine a range of outcomes after MVC, including both regional and widespread pain and psychological sequelae. These studies will allow us to learn more about the rich and complex interactions between central neurobiological processes and psychosocial factors which occur during the transition from acute injury to chronic disorder, whether the outcome is a chronic pain disorder like WAD or fibromyalgia or a psychiatric disorder like PTSD. They may also lead us to acute, posttrauma interventions that may be able to prevent development of both PTSD and chronic pain syndromes.

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Richard H. Gracely, PhD, and the reviewers for helping us to improve the paper.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Cote P, Lemstra M, Berglund A, Nygren A. Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1179–86.

2. Kuch K, Cox BJ, Evans RJ. Posttraumatic stress disorder and motor vehicle accidents: a multidisciplinary overview. Can J Psychiatry 1996;41:429–34.

3. Mayou R, Bryant B, Duthie R. Psychiatric consequences of road traffic accidents. BMJ 1993;307:647–51.

4. Ehlers A, Mayou R, Bryant B. Psychological predictors of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder after motor vehicle accidents. J Abnorm Psychol 1998;107:508–19.

5. White KP, Carette S, Harth M, Bell MJ, Speechley M, Truls O, Dreyer J, Nielson W, Teasell R. The post-MVC health survey: a controlled epidemiological study to estimate fibromyalgia incidence post motor vehicle collision. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:S486.

6. Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain 2000;85:317–32.

7. Norton PJ, Asmundson GJ. Amending the fear-avoidance model of chronic pain: what is the role of physiological arousal? Behav Ther 2003;34:17–30.

8. Clark DM. A cognitive approach to panic. Behav Res Ther 1986;24:461–70.

9. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, Zeiss E: Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining “whiplash” and its management. Spine 1995;20:1S–73S.

10. Bogduk N, Yoganandan N. Biomechanics of the cervical spine part 3: minor injuries. Clin Biomech 2001;16:267–75.

11. Partheni M, Constantoyannis C, Ferrari R, Nikiforidis G, Voulgaris S, Papadakis N. A prospective cohort study of the outcome of acute whiplash injury in Greece. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2000;18:67–70.

12. Meyer S, Hugemann RE, Weber M. Zur Belastung der HWS dutch Auffahrkollisionen. Verkehrsunfall Fahrzeugtechnik 1994;32:187–99.

13. Castro WH. Correlation between exposure to biomechanical stress and whiplash associated disorders (WAD). Pain Res Manag 2003;8:76–8.

14. Kasch H, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Arendt-Nielsen L, Staehelin Jensen T. Headache, neck pain, and neck mobility after acute whiplash injury: a prospective study. Spine 2001;26:1246–51.

15. Satoh S, Naito S, Konishi T, Yoshikawa M, Morita N, Okada T, Kageyama T, Matsuzaki I. An examination of reasons for prolonged treatment in Japanese patients with whiplash injuries. J Musculoskeletal Pain 1997;5:71–84.

16. Suissa S, Harder S, Veilleux M. The relation between initial symptoms and signs and the prognosis of whiplash. Eur Spine J 2001;10:44–9.

17. Harder S, Veilleux M, Suissa S. The effect of socio-demographic and crash-related factors on the prognosis of whiplash. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:377–84.

18. Castro WH, Meyer SJ, Becke ME, Nentwig CG, Hein MF, Ercan BI, Thomann S, Wessels U, Du Chesne AE. No stress-no whiplash? prevalence of “whiplash” symptoms following exposure to a placebo rear-end collision. Int J Legal Med 2001;114:316–22.

19. Wolfe F, Smythe H, Yunus M, Bennett R, Bombardier C, Goldenberg D. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia: report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:160–172.

20. Turk DC, Okifuji A, Starz TW, Sinclair JD. Effects of type of symptom onset on psychological distress and disability in fibromyalgia syndrome patients. Pain 1996;68:423–30.

21. Sherman JJ, Turk DC, Okifuji A. Prevalence and impact of posttraumatic stress disorder-like symptoms on patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Clin J Pain 2000;16:127–34.

22. McLean SA, Williams DA, Clauw DJ. Fibromyalgia after motor vehicle collision: evidence and implications. Traffic Inj Prev 2005; 6: 97–104.

23. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition: DSM-IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.

24. Chrousos GP. Stressors, stress, and neuroendocrine integration of the adaptive response: the 1997 Hans Selye Memorial Lecture. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998;851:311–35.

25. McGaugh JL. Significance and remembrance: the role of neuromodulatory systems. Psychological Sci 1990;1:15–25.

26. Pitman RK. Post-traumatic stress disorder, hormones, and memory. Biol Psychiatry 1989;26:221–3.

27. Shalev AY, Freedman S, Peri T, Brandes D, Sahar T, Orr SP, Pitman RK. Prospective study of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression following trauma. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:630–7.

28. Bryant RA, Harvey AG, Guthrie RM, Moulds ML. A prospective study of psychophysiological arousal, acute stress disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 2000;109:341–4.

29. Zatzick DF, Russo J, Pitman RK, Rivara F, Jurkovich G, Roy-Byrne P. Reevaluating the association between emergency department heart rate and the development of posttraumatic stress disorder: a public health approach. Biol Psychiatry 2005;57:91–5.

30. Pitman RK, Sanders KM, Zusman RM, Healy AR, Cheema F, Lasko NB, Cahill L, Orr SP. Pilot study of secondary prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder with propranolol. Biol Psychiatry 2002;51:189–92.

31. Vaiva G, Ducrocq F, Jezequel K, Averland B, Lestavel P, Brunet A, Marmar CR. Immediate treatment with propranolol decreases posttraumatic stress disorder two months after trauma. Biol Psychiatry 2003;54:947–9.

32. Roozendaal B. Stress and memory: opposing effects of glucocorticoids on memory consolidation and memory retrieval. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2002;78:578–95.

33. Delahanty DL, Nugent NR, Christopher NC, Walsh M. Initial urinary epinephrine and cortisol levels predict acute PTSD symptoms in child trauma victims. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2005;30:121–8.

34. deq Uervain DJ, Roozendaal B, Nitsch RM, McGaugh JL, Hock C. Acute cortisone administration impairs retrieval of long-term declarative memory in humans. Nat Neurosci 2000;3:313–4.

35. Munck A, Guyre PM, Holbrook NJ. Physiological functions of glucocorticoids in stress and their relation to pharmacological actions. Endocr Rev 1984;5:25–44.

36. Yehuda R, Harvey H. Relevance of neuroendocrine alterations in PTSD to cognitive impairments of trauma survivors. In: Read D, Lindsay S, eds. Recollections of Trauma: Scientific Research and Clinical Practice. New York: Plenum Press; 1997:221–252.

37. McFarlane AC, Atchison M, Yehuda R. The acute stress response following motor vehicle accidents and its relation to PTSD. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1997;821:437–41.

38. Delahanty DL, Raimonde AJ, Spoonster E, Cullado M. Injury severity, prior trauma history, urinary cortisol levels, and acute PTSD in motor vehicle accident victims. J Anxiety Disord 2003;17:149–64.

39. Delahanty DL, Raimonde AJ, Spoonster E. Initial posttraumatic urinary cortisol levels predict subsequent PTSD symptoms in motor vehicle accident victims. Biol Psychiatry 2000;48:940–7.

40. Schelling G. Effects of stress hormones on traumatic memory formation and the development of posttraumatic stress disorder in critically ill patients. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2002;78:596–609.

41. Schelling G, Briegel J, Roozendaal B, Stoll C, Rothenhausler HB, Kapfhammer HP. The effect of stress doses of hydrocortisone during septic shock on posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors. Biol Psychiatry 2001;50:978–85.

42. Sterling M, Jull G, Vicenzino B, Kenardy J. The development of psychological changes following whiplash injury. Pain 2003;106:481–489.

43. Drottning M. Acute emotional response to common whiplash predicts subsequent pain complaints: a prospective study of 107 subjects sustaining whiplash injury. Nord J Psychiatry 1995;49:293–9.

44. Crofford L, Demitrack M. Evidence that abnormalities of central neurohormonal systems are key to understanding fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1996;22:267–84.

45. Pillemer S, Bradley L, Crofford L, Moldofsky H, Chrousos G. The neuroscience and endocrinology of fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1928–39.

46. Clauw D, Chrousos G. Chronic pain and fatigue syndromes: overlapping clinical and neuroendocrine features and potential pathogenic mechanism. Neuroimmunomodulation 1997;4:134–53.

47. Breslau N, Davis GC. Posttraumatic stress disorder in an urban population of young adults: risk factors for chronicity. Am J Psychiatry 1992;149:671–5.

48. Makela M, Heliovaara M. Prevalence of primary fibromyalgia in the Finnish population. BMJ 1991;303:216–9.

49. Breslau N, Davis GC, Andreski P. Risk factors for PTSD-related traumatic events: a prospective analysis. Am J Psychiatry 1995;152:529–35.

50. Olsson I, Bunketorp O, Carlsson SG, Styf J. Prediction of outcome in whiplash-associated disorders using West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory. Clin J Pain 2002;18:238–44.

51. Berglund A, Alfredsson L, Jensen I, Cassidy JD, Nygren A. The association between exposure to a rear-end collision and future health complaints. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:851–6.

52. Brunello N, Davidson JR, Deahl M, Kessler RC, Mendlewicz J, Racagni G, Shalev AY, Zohar J. Posttraumatic stress disorder: diagnosis and epidemiology, comorbidity and social consequences, biology and treatment. Neuropsychobiology 2001;43:150–62.

53. Cohen H, Neumann L, Haiman Y, Matar MA, Press J, Buskila D. Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder in fibromyalgia patients: overlapping syndromes or post-traumatic fibromyalgia syndrome? Semin Arthritis Rheum 2002;32:38–50.

54. Hickling EJ, Blanchard EB. Post-traumatic stress disorder and motor vehicle accidents. J Anxiety Disord 1992;6:285–91.

55. Taylor S, Koch WJ. Anxiety disorders due to motor vehicle accidents: nature and treatment. Clin Psychol Rev 1995;15:721–38.

56. Jaspers JP. Whiplash and post-traumatic stress disorder. Disabil Rehabil 1998;20:397–404.

57. Mayou R, Bryant B. Psychiatry of whiplash neck injury. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:441–8.

58. Amir M, Kaplan Z, Neumann L, Sharabani R, Shani N, Buskila D. Posttraumatic stress disorder, tenderness and fibromyalgia. J Psychosom Res 1997;42:607–13.

59. Beckham JC, Crawford AL, Feldman ME, Kirby AC, Hertzberg MA, Davidson JR, Moore SD. Chronic posttraumatic stress disorder and chronic pain in Vietnam combat veterans. J Psychosom Res 1997;43:379–89.

60. Hubbard J, Realmuto GM, Northwood AK, Masten AS. Comorbidity of psychiatric diagnoses with posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of childhood trauma. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1995;34:1167–73.

61. Hudson JI, Arnold LM, Keck PE Jr, Auchenbach MB, Pope HG Jr. Family study of fibromyalgia and affective spectrum disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2004;56:884–91.

62. Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Hughes M, Nelson CB. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52:1048–60.

63. Resnick HS, Yehuda R, Pitman RK, Foy DW. Effect of previous trauma on acute plasma cortisol level following rape. Am J Psychiatry 1995;152:1675–7.

64. Goldberg RT, Pachas WN, Keith D. Relationship between traumatic events in childhood and chronic pain. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:23–30.

65. Taylor ML, Trotter DR, Csuka ME. The prevalence of sexual abuse in women with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:229–34.

66. Carpenter LL, Tyrka AR, McDougle CJ, Malison RT, Owens MJ, Nemeroff CB, Price LH. Cerebrospinal fluid corticotropin-releasing factor and perceived early-life stress in depressed patients and healthy control subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004;29:777–84.

67. Heim C, Plotsky PM, Nemeroff CB. Importance of studying the contributions of early adverse experience to neurobiological findings in depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004;29:641–8.

68. Sternberg WF, Ridgway CG. Effects of gestational stress and neonatal handling on pain, analgesia, and stress behavior of adult mice. Physiol Behav 2003;78:375–83.

69. Sternberg WF, Scorr L, Smith LD, Ridgway CG, Stout M. Long-term effects of neonatal surgery on adulthood pain behavior. Pain. In press.

70. Sterling M, Jull G, Vicenzino B, Kenardy J. Characterization of acute whiplash-associated disorders. Spine 2004;29:182–8.

71. Sterling M, Jull G, Vicenzino B, Kenardy J, Darnell R. Physical and psychological factors predict outcome following whiplash injury. Pain 2005;114:141–8.

72. Buskila D, Neumann L, Vaisberg G, Alkalay D, Wolfe F. Increased rates of fibromyalgia following cervical spine injury: a controlled study of 161 cases of traumatic injury. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:446–52.

73. Yehuda R. Post-traumatic stress disorder. N Engl J Med 2002;346:108–14.

74. Elzinga BM, Schmahl CG, Vermetten E, van Dyck R, Bremner JD. Higher cortisol levels following exposure to traumatic reminders in abuse-related PTSD. Neuropsychopharmacology 2003;28:1656–65.

75. Liberzon I, Abelson JL, Flagel SB, Raz J, Young EA. Neuroendocrine and psychophysiologic responses in PTSD: a symptom provocation study. Neuropsychopharmacology 1999;21:40–50.

76. Crofford LJ. Neuroendocrine abnormalities in fibromyalgia and related disorders. Am J Med Sci 1998;315:359–66.

77. Martinez-Lavin M, Hermosillo AG, Rosas M, Soto ME. Circadian studies of autonomic nervous balance in patients with fibromyalgia: a heart rate variability analysis. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41:1966–71.

78. Stein PK, Domitrovich PP, Ambrose K, Lyden A, Fine M, Gracely RH, Clauw DJ. Sex effects on heart rate variability in fibromyalgia and Gulf War illness. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:700–8.

79. Liberzon I, Phan KL. Brain-imaging studies of posttraumatic stress disorder. CNS Spectr 2003;8:641–50.

80. Shin LM, Wright CI, Cannistraro PA, Wedig MM, McMullin K, Martis B, Macklin ML, Lasko NB, Cavanagh SR, Krangel TS, Orr SP, Pitman RK, Whalen PJ, Rauch SL. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex responses to overtly presented fearful faces in posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:273–81.

81. Gracely RH, Geisser ME, Giesecke T, Grant MA, Petzke F, Williams DA, Clauw DJ. Pain catastrophizing and neural responses to pain among persons with fibromyalgia. Brain 2004;127:835–43.

82. Picavet HS, Vlaeyen JW, Schouten JS. Pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia: predictors of chronic low back pain. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:1028–34.

83. Ohara PT, Vit JP, Jasmin L. Cortical modulation of pain. Cell Mol Life Sci 2005;62:44–52.

84. Zhuo M, Gebhart GF. Modulation of noxious and non-noxious spinal mechanical transmission from the rostral medial medulla in the rat. J Neurophysiol 2002;88:2928–41.

85. Millan MJ. Descending control of pain. Prog Neurobiol 2002;66:355–474.

86. Neugebauer V, Li W, Bird GC, Han JS. The amygdala and persistent pain. Neuroscientist 2004;10:221–34.

87. Sterling M, Jull G, Vicenzino B, Kenardy J. Sensory hypersensitivity occurs soon after whiplash injury and is associated with poor recovery. Pain 2003;104:507–19.

88. Banic B, Petersen-Felix S, Andersen OK, Radanov BP, Villiger PM, Arendt-Nielsen L, Curatolo M. Evidence for spinal cord hypersensitivity in chronic pain after whiplash injury and in fibromyalgia. Pain 2004;107:7–15.

89. Kosek E, Hansson P. Modulatory influence on somatosensory perception from vibration and heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation (HNCS) in fibromyalgia patients and healthy subjects. Pain 1997;70:41–51.

90. Kosek E, Ekholm J, Hansson P. Modulation of pressure pain thresholds during and following isometric contraction in patients with fibromyalgia and in healthy controls. Pain 1996;64:415–23.

91. Lautenbacher S, Rollman G. Possible deficiencies of pain modulation in fibromyalgia. Clin J Pain 1997;13:189–96.

92. Vaeroy H, Helle R, Forre O, Kass E, Terenius L. Elevated CSF levels of substance P and high incidence of Raynaud phenomenon in patients with fibromyalgia: new features for diagnosis. Pain 1988;32:21–6.

93. Russell IJ, Orr MD, Littman B, Vipraio GA, Alboukrek D, Michalek JE, Lopez Y, MacKillip F. Elevated cerebrospinal fluid levels of substance P in patients with the fibromyalgia syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 1994;37:1593–601.

94. Kasch H, Qerama E, Bach FW, Jensen TS. Reduced cold pressor pain tolerance in non-recovered whiplash patients: a 1-year prospective study. Eur J Pain. In press.

95. De Nicola AF, Moses DF, Gonzalez S, Orti E. Adrenocorticoid action in the spinal cord: some unique molecular properties of glucocorticoid receptors. Cell Mol Neurobiol 1989;9:179–92.

96. Cintra A, Molander C, Fuxe K. Colocalization of Fos- and glucocorticoid receptor-immunoreactivities is present only in a very restricted population of dorsal horn neurons of the rat spinal cord after nociceptive stimulation. Brain Res 1993;632:334–8.

97. Capasso A, Di Giannuario A, Loizzo A, Pieretti S, Sorrentino L: Central interaction of dexamethasone and RU-38486 on morphine antinociception in mice. Life Sci 1992;51:PL139–43.

98. Pieretti S, Capasso A, Di Giannuario A, Loizzo A, Sorrentino L. The interaction of peripherally and centrally administered dexamethasone and RU 38486 on morphine analgesia in mice. Gen Pharmacol 1991;22:929–33.

99. Lim G, Wang S, Zeng Q, Sung B, Mao J. Evidence for a long-term influence on morphine tolerance after previous morphine exposure: role of neuronal glucocorticoid receptors. Pain. In press.

100. Watkins LR, Maier SF, Goehler LE. Immune activation: the role of pro-inflammatory cytokines in inflammation, illness responses and pathological pain states. Pain 1995;63:289–302.

101. Farrell M, Van Meter J, Petzke F, Wolfe J, Grant MA, Clauw DJ, Gracely RH. Supraspinal activity associated with painful pressure in fibromyalgia is associated with beliefs about locus of pain control. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:S394.

102. Borchgrevink GE, Kaasa A, McDonagh D, Stiles TC, Haraldseth O, Lereim I. Acute treatment of whiplash neck sprain injuries: a randomized trial of treatment during the first 14 days after a car accident. Spine 1998;23:25–31.

103. Glass JM, Lyden AK, Petzke F, Stein P, Whalen G, Ambrose K, Chrousos G, Clauw DJ. The effect of brief exercise cessation on pain, fatigue, and mood symptom development in healthy, fit individuals. J Psychosom Res 2004;57:391–8.

104. Ferrari R, Constantoyannis C, Papadakis N. Laypersons' expectation of the sequelae of whiplash injury: a cross-cultural comparative study between Canada and Greece. Med Sci Monit 2003;9:CR120–4.

Keywords:

whiplash-associated disorders; pain; trauma; stress; fibromyalgia; PTSD

Copyright © 2005 by American Psychosomatic Society

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.