Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 2007 - Volume 27 - Issue 5 > A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Effects...
You could be reading the full-text of this article now...
If you have access to this article through your institution, you can view this article in OvidSP.
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology:
October 2007 - Volume 27 - Issue 5 - pp 488-492
doi: 10.1097/jcp.0b013e318151521c
Brief Reports

A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Effects of Low Frequency Right Prefrontal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Depression

Fitzgerald, Paul B. MBBS, MPM, PhD, FRANZCP; Sritharan, Anusha BSc, PhD; Daskalakis, Zafiris J. MD, PhD, FRCP(C); de Castella, Anthony R. BA; Kulkarni, Jayashri MBBS, MPM, FRANZCP, PhD; Egan, Gary BSc (Hons), PhD, MBA

Collapse Box

Abstract

The study aimed to explore the biological effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LFR-TMS) treatment applied to the right prefrontal cortex, comparing this with the effects of high-frequency left-sided (HFL-TMS) in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Twenty-six patients with treatment-resistant depression were randomized to receive either daily LFR-TMS or HFL-TMS treatment for 3 weeks and underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during a planning task before and after treatment. Patients responded clinically to both forms of treatment with no difference in the degree of response (F1,24 = 0.65;P > 0.05). Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation resulted in no overall change in task-related activation. However, responders to LFR-TMS demonstrated a bilateral decrease in activity in middle frontal gyrus. In contrast, HFL-TMS produced an increase in activation in left precuneus with responders showing increased activation in several additional regions. Response to LFR-TMS is associated with a bilateral reduction in frontal activation that does not seem to be a nonspecific effect of treatment and differs from the response to HFL-TMS.

© 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login




Help

Forgot Password?