Skip Navigation LinksHome > August 2012 - Volume 32 - Issue 4 > Human Abuse Potential and Cognitive Effects of Taranabant, a...
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology:
doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31825d380d
Original Contributions

Human Abuse Potential and Cognitive Effects of Taranabant, a Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Inverse Agonist: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Crossover Study in Recreational Polydrug Users

Schoedel, Kerri A. PhD*; Addy, Carol MD, MMSc; Chakraborty, Bijan M Stat*; Rosko, Kim BS; Dunbar, Stephanie PhD; Maes, Andrea PhD†‡; Chen, Nancy PhD*; Stoch, Selwyn Aubrey MD; Wagner, John MD, PhD; Chodakewitz, Jeff MD; Sellers, Edward M. MD, PhD, FRCPC, FACP

Supplemental Author Material
Collapse Box


Introduction: Taranabant is a cannabinoid 1 receptor inverse agonist that was in development for treatment of obesity. Because of central nervous system effects, the study was performed to assess the abuse potential and cognitive effects of taranabant in recreational polydrug users compared with phentermine, dronabinol, and placebo.

Methods: Stimulant- and cannabis-experienced polydrug users (N = 30) were randomized in a double-blind crossover study to receive taranabant 2, 4, 10, and 20 mg; phentermine 45 and 90 mg; dronabinol 20 mg; and placebo. Subjective and neurocognitive measures were administered for 24 hours, and peak/peak change from baseline effects were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model.

Results: Phentermine 45 and 90 mg showed abuse-related subjective effects versus placebo, including drug liking, overall drug liking, and other positive/stimulant effects, whereas dronabinol 20 mg showed abuse-related positive, cannabis-like, and sedative effects. Taranabant was not significantly different from placebo on most of the subjective measures other than negative/dysphoric effects at the highest dose, and its effects were significantly less pronounced relative to phentermine and dronabinol on most measures. Phentermine improved cognitive/motor performance and dronabinol impaired motor/cognitive performance on some measures, whereas taranabant 4 and 20 mg had minor impairment effects on manual tracking.

Conclusions: The phentermine and dronabinol results demonstrate the validity and sensitivity of the study. Taranabant did not consistently show stimulant/cannabis-like effects or abuse potential in recreational polydrug users, indicating that cannabinoid 1 receptor inverse agonists/antagonists are unlikely to be recreationally abused.

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.