Share this article on:

Using the Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap to Reconstruct Sacral Sore

Hong, Joon Pio (Jp) MD, PhD, MMM; Choi, DongHoon MD; Lee, YeonHoon MD; Kim, YoungChul MD; Jang, Minyoung RN; Peter Suh, HyunSuk MD, PhD

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open: June 2017 - Volume 5 - Issue 6 - p e1368
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001368
Operative Technique Video Articles
Korea

From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Received for publication February 24, 2017; accepted April 20, 2017.

Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. The Article Processing Charge was paid for by the authors.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Clickable URL citations appear in the text.

Joon Pio (Jp) Hong, MD, PhD, MMM, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan Collage of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Sonpa-gu, Seoul, Korea 05505, E-mail: joonphong@amc.seoul.kr

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

Initial surgical management of sacral sores begins with debridement. This procedure is one of the key steps, as it removes infected, necrotic, desiccated bone/soft tissue, and prepares the wound for further reconstruction. In this video, we used surgical options such as wide excision and a hydroject debridement device (see video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, which shows important steps in using a gluteal artery perforator flap to reconstruct sacral sores. This video is available in the Related Videos section of the Full-Text article on PRSGlobalOpen.com or available at http://links.lww.com/PRSGO/A459).

Reconstruction can be performed immediately after debridement or may be done after staged debridement until relevant risk factors are improved. Flaps are usually the choice of reconstruction in deep ulcers, as the vascularized tissue will facilitate wound healing and provide padding to redistribute pressure over the sacrum. Common options for sacral pressure ulcers include musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps. They have advantages; but when the margin of the closure is in the midline of the defect, high rate of recurrence over the bony prominence may be seen.

The concept of perforators has allowed a new dimension in reconstructive surgery. A perforator flap has the vascular supply for the skin island from a single perforator penetrating the deep muscle fascia.1 The propeller flap is a local island skin flap based on a perforator and is intentionally rotated based on this single perforator, resulting in effective transposition.2 By designing with accuracy, this perforator-based propeller flap can be used locally to cover defects of the sacrum without sacrificing any muscle, providing sufficient bulk to pad the sacral bone while closing the donor site primarily. Because any perforator can be used as a flap, the free style flap leads to flexible design of propeller flaps, enhancing the chance for prompt reconstruction.3 A hand-held Doppler can be used to preoperatively identify possible perforators. After debridement, one should reassess the perforator and start to explore the perforator with an exploratory incision. Physically identifying the perforator with a strong pulse is a key step. Subfascial approach usually makes the identification easier compared with the other layers of elevation. After the identification, a final design of the flap as a freestyle flap is made.4 One can mark the hot zone of the flap around the perforator and rapidly elevate the outer cold zone on the subfascial layer. Once the hot zone is reached, a meticulous approach should be made to dissect the perforator. More dissection or a near-skeletonized perforator with longer pedicle will allow you to have a better rotation without kinking from surrounding tissues.

Using the propeller flaps to reconstruct the sacral region in a free style approach can achieve tension-free closure, padding over the bony prominence, primary closure of the donor site, minimal muscle sacrifice, and coverage with a well-vascularized tissue.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Hallock GGDirect and indirect perforator flaps: the history and the controversy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:855–865; quiz 866.
2. Pignatti M, Ogawa R, Hallock GG, et alThe “Tokyo” consensus on propeller flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:716–722.
3. Park SW, Oh TS, Eom JS, et alFreestyle multiple propeller flap reconstruction (jigsaw puzzle approach) for complicated back defects. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015;31:261–267.
4. Oh TS, Hallock G, Hong JPFreestyle propeller flaps to reconstruct defects of the posterior trunk: a simple approach to a difficult problem. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:79–82.

Supplemental Digital Content

Back to Top | Article Outline
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved.