Abstract 43: One-Year Outcomes of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study Part II: Patient-Reported Outcomes

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open: April 2016 - Volume 4 - Issue 4S - p 23
doi: 10.1097/01.GOX.0000488913.54079.22
PRS AAPS Oral Proofs 2016

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.

Andrea L. Pusic, MD, MHS,* Hyungin Myra Kim, ScD,† Jennifer B. Hamill, MPH,‡ Ji Qi, MS,‡ Edwin G. Wilkins, MD, MS‡

From the *Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y.; †Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; and ‡Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.

PURPOSE: The goal of postmastectomy reconstruction is to minimize deformity and optimize quality of life as perceived by the patient. This study prospectively evaluates patient-reported outcomes for breast reconstruction patients.

METHODS: Eleven sites enrolled women undergoing first time, immediate, or delayed reconstruction after mastectomy. Procedures included implant-based latissimus dorsi, pedicle TRAM, free TRAM, and DIEP reconstructions. Patients completed the BREAST-Q and PROMIS-29 preoperatively and at 1 year postsurgery. For each outcome, separate linear mixed-effects models were used to test for within-patient 1-year outcomes and to compare outcomes across procedure types. Both models were weighted for nonresponse and used site as random intercepts, and the latter was adjusted for baseline covariates.

RESULTS: One thousand five hundred fifty-two Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium patients were included, and 1130 (73%) responded to 1-year questionnaires. Across procedure types, immediate reconstruction patients experienced satisfaction with their breasts and psychosocial well-being equal to or better than preoperative status. Physical well-being of the chest was not fully restored (P < 0.001 implant patients; P = 0.02 autologous), nor was physical well-being of the abdomen for autologous patients (P < 0.001). Autologous patients reported greater satisfaction with their breasts compared to implant patients, adjusting for covariates (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: One year after surgery, patients experience satisfaction with their breasts equal to or greater than their preoperative status; physical well-being, however, is not fully restored. Patients who choose autologous reconstruction are more satisfied with their breasts than implant patients.

© 2016 American Society of Plastic Surgeons