Abstract 32: Is Methodologic Quality Influenced by Industry Support? An Analysis of the Plastic Surgery Literature

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open: April 2016 - Volume 4 - Issue 4S - p 17
doi: 10.1097/01.GOX.0000488902.78735.5e
PRS AAPS Oral Proofs 2016

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.

Brian H. Cho, MD,* Joseph Lopez, MD, MBA,* Sandra Lopez, BS,* Jessica Means, BA,† Jacqueline Milton, PhD,‡ James W. May, MD,§ Amir H. Dorafshar, MBChB*

From the *Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.; †Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, N.Y.; ‡Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.; and §Division of Plastic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.

PURPOSE: Conflicts-of-interest (COI) are an emerging area of discussion within the field of plastic surgery. Recently, several studies have found that studies that disclose COI are associated with publication of positive outcomes. We hypothesize that this association is driven by industry’s funding of higher quality studies. This study aimed to investigate the association between industry affiliation and study methodological quality.

METHODS: We reviewed all entries in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery, and Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery within a 1-year period encompassing 2013. All clinical original research articles were analyzed. Studies were evaluated blindly for study methodology quality based on a validated scoring system. A logistic regression model was used to examine the association between methodology score and COI.

RESULTS: A total of 1474 articles were reviewed, of which, 489 met our inclusion criterion. These underwent methodologic quality scoring. COI were reported in 29 articles (5.9%). Although the prevalence of higher study methodology scores differed in studies that disclosed COI when compared with those that did not (P = 0.0042), there was no significant association between articles with COI and higher methodologic score (P = 0.8139) after adjusting for article characteristics such as plastic surgery subspecialty.

CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgery clinical studies that disclose COI are not associated with higher methodologic quality when compared with studies that do not disclose COI. These findings suggest that although articles with COI are associated with the publication of positive findings, this association is not necessarily driven by higher quality studies.

© 2016 American Society of Plastic Surgeons