Reply: Pretarsal Augmented Lower Blepharoplasty

Jeon, Yeo Reum M.D.; Choi, Hong Lim M.D., Ph.D.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery: April 2017 - Volume 139 - Issue 4 - p 1019e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003196
Letters

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

JW Plastic Surgery Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to Dr. Choi, JW Plastic Surgery Clinic, Samsin Building, 598-6, Sinsadong, Gangnamgu, Seoul, Republic of Korea, hlchoi1218@nate.com

Article Outline
Back to Top | Article Outline

Sir:

First of all, it is our delight to respond to Dr. Putterman’s letter. We do agree with the point Dr. Putterman has made, that there may be a cultural difference in perspective of attractiveness.

Today in many Asian countries, a narrow and plump pretarsal roll is considered a characteristic of attractiveness and youthfulness. Thus, it is not surprising to see that accentuation of pretarsal fullness by makeup technique or filler injection has gained popularity among young Asian women.1 It should be noted that pretarsal augmentation seems to be more effective in creating contour for shallow-set eyes, which is a typical Asian facial feature. Asians tend to have shallow-set eyes compared with a typical Caucasian face, resulting in a flatter facial appearance. As Dr. Putterman has mentioned, Caucasian patients might find additional contouring by pretarsal augmentation unnecessary, and we have to agree that this technique might have fewer advantages for deep-set eyes.

Nevertheless, it is hard to say that interest in pretarsal fullness is exclusive for Asian patients, because there indeed are Caucasian patients who favor a fuller pretarsal roll. In such cases, pretarsal augmented lower blepharoplasty has been implemented to achieve the desired effect. Thus, it is advisable to enquire about a patient’s preference for pretarsal fullness during preoperative consultation, regardless of his or her race. The authors would like to express sincere appreciation for the interest Dr. Putterman has shown for our work.2

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCLOSURE

The authors have no financial interests or commercial associations to declare in relation to the content of this communication.

Yeo Reum Jeon, M.D.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital

Goyang, Republic of Korea

Institute for Human Tissue Restoration

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Yonsei University College of Medicine

Seoul, Republic of Korea

Hong Lim Choi, M.D., Ph.D.

JW Plastic Surgery Clinic

Seoul, Republic of Korea

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCE

1. Chen MC, Ma H, Liao WCAnthropometry of pretarsal fullness and eyelids in oriental women. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37:617–624.
2. Jeon YR, Rah DK, Lew DH, Roh TS, Kim YS, Choi HLPretarsal augmented lower blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:74–82.
Back to Top | Article Outline

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article’s publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Letters submitted should pose a specific question that clarifies a point that either was not made in the article or was unclear, and therefore a response from the corresponding author of the article is requested.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

The Journal requests that individuals submit no more than five (5) letters to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in a calendar year.

©2017American Society of Plastic Surgeons