Share this article on:

Concomitant Liposuction Reduces Complications of Vertical Medial Thigh Lift in Massive Weight Loss Patients

Knotts, Christopher D. M.D.; Hunstad, Joseph P. M.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: April 2017 - Volume 139 - Issue 4 - p 1019e–1020e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003197
Letters

Austin-Weston Center for Cosmetic Surgery, Reston, Va.

Hunstad-Kortesis Center for Cosmetic Surgery, Huntersville, N.C., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, N.C.

Correspondence to Dr. Knotts, Austin-Weston Center for Cosmetic Surgery, 1825 Samuel Morse Drive, Reston, Va. 20190, c.knotts.md@gmail.com

Back to Top | Article Outline

Sir:

We would like to congratulate Drs. Schmidt et al.1 on their recently published article regarding vertical thighplasty. In the article, they use the avulsion technique described by us in 2014 with regard to brachioplasty2 and then again related to thighplasty in 2016.3 In their article, comparison is made between traditional excision thighplasty and avulsion thighplasty. The authors found the complication profile to be so much more favorable with the avulsion technique that the excisional technique was abandoned, an experience that mimics our own.

We would like to support the authors’ mention regarding moving the procedure to a purely outpatient setting and abandoning the use of drains. In our current experience and in previously published studies regarding the avulsion technique, the risk of major complications is low, including zero deep venous thromboses, pulmonary emboli, or hospital admissions. The risk of minor complications such as seroma (2 percent in our published data) or wound healing problems (40 percent in our published data) was more common, but neither of these conditions would benefit from inpatient care. We routinely perform avulsion thigh and arm surgery in combination with more significant body and facial contouring procedures, all on an outpatient basis, and encourage other surgeons to do so as well.

Performing these procedures in a private practice setting in the United States is considered “cosmetic,” and requiring a week-long hospital stay after a thigh lift would mean increased cost to the patient and would be seen as careless use of hospital resources better suited for seriously ill patients. We have not published our data regarding oral pain medication use after surgery, but the overarching finding is that patients experience good pain control with an oral medication regimen, and admission for intravenous pain medication is also unwarranted.

Regarding the potential for addition of adjunctive liposuction techniques such as ultrasound, discussed in the article by Schmidt et al., our experience has been that adding laser liposuction near the area of resection increases the complication profile. Although these heat-based techniques do supposedly lead to less bruising and possibly more skin retraction,4 they likely do so by altering the blood flow, which can lead to healing complications when heat-based adjuncts are coupled with skin excision.4–7

We applaud the authors on the nature of their retrospective study and agree with their assessment of the avulsion technique. It is our hope that more surgeons will bring away from their published work the repeated safety profile of the technique and begin to implement it to care for their own patients.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCLOSURE

The authors have no financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this communication.

Christopher D. Knotts, M.D.

Austin-Weston Center for Cosmetic Surgery

Reston, Va.

Joseph P. Hunstad, M.D.

Hunstad-Kortesis Center for Cosmetic Surgery

Huntersville, N.C.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, N.C.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Schmidt M, Pollhammer MS, Januszyk M, Duscher D, Huemer GMConcomitant liposuction reduces complications of vertical medial thigh lift in massive weight loss patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:1748–1757.
2. Knotts CD, Kortesis BG, Hunstad JPAvulsion brachioplasty: Technique overview and 5-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:283–288.
3. Hunstad JP, Kortesis BG, Knotts CDAvulsion thighplasty: Technique overview and 6-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:84–87.
4. Karmo FR, Milan MF, Silbergleit ABlood loss in major liposuction procedures: A comparison study using suction-assisted versus ultrasonically assisted lipoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:241–247; discussion 248.
5. Vanek PF, Nagy MWA multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial comparing VASER-assisted lipoplasty and suction-assisted lipoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(Suppl):23.
6. DiBernardo BE, Reyes JEvaluation of skin tightening after laser-assisted liposuction. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;29:400–407.
7. Prado A, Andrades P, Danilla S, Leniz P, Castillo P, Gaete FA prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial comparing laser-assisted lipoplasty with suction-assisted lipoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1032–1045.
Back to Top | Article Outline

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article’s publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Letters submitted should pose a specific question that clarifies a point that either was not made in the article or was unclear, and therefore a response from the corresponding author of the article is requested.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

The Journal requests that individuals submit no more than five (5) letters to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in a calendar year.

©2017American Society of Plastic Surgeons