Share this article on:

Concomitant Liposuction Reduces Complications of Vertical Medial Thigh Lift in Massive Weight Loss Patients

Webster, Ronaldo M.D., Ph.D.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: March 2017 - Volume 139 - Issue 3 - p 802e–803e
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003097
Letters

Department of Plastic Surgery, Universidade Federal de Ciências da, Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil

Correspondence to Dr. Webster, R. Mariano de Matos 718, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul Brazil 90880250, webstercplastica@me.com

Back to Top | Article Outline

Sir:

I would like to compliment Schmidt et al. for the article “Concomitant Liposuction Reduces Complications of Vertical Medial Thigh Lift in Massive Weight Loss Patients,”1 which discusses the decreased complication rate associated with liposuction during a medial thigh lift. Despite the good results presented in this article, potential wound complications requiring additional care have not been addressed when there is association between the vertical incision in the medial thigh and an incision in the horizontal groin crease when dealing with the excess proximal thigh skin in more severe cases. This problem can be associated also with metabolic changes from bariatric surgery and therapeutic corticosteroid therapy, among other causes.

Thus, to overcome those cases of potential wound complications, we have devised a technical modification of the conventional T-incision technique that was initially addressed by us under the name helicoidal thigh lift. The technique was associated safely with liposuction, as proposed by the authors.

Our first case was a 30-year-old female patient (body mass index, 26 kg/m2) who underwent pulse therapy with corticosteroids for acute pulmonary vasculitis and gained 60 pounds over 3 months. She lost 40 pounds after 6 months, but striae remained over her body (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

We devised the helicoidal incision approach to avoid wound complications and treat most of the thigh striae. The elliptical skin island resection started in the groin crease, ran obliquely and downward to the inner thigh, and followed the posterior aspect of the popliteal fossa. Vertical and horizontal skin components were able to be resected using the same single oblique incision on the medial aspect of the thigh. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was very pleased with the final result (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Once there are no scar intersections, as in the T standard incision, there are fewer cicatricial stress points subjected to potential complication. As far as we know, this modification has not been reported previously, and we would like to share it with our colleagues. Further controlled studies are needed to compare this approach with the standard techniques available to correct the problem.

Presented at the 2016 Symposium of Academic Students in the city of Porto Alegre, best of the session award.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCLOSURE

There are no financial disclosures to be made by the author.

Ronaldo Webster, M.D., Ph.D.

Department of Plastic Surgery

Universidade Federal de Ciências da

Saúde de Porto Alegre

Porto Alegre, Brazil

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCE

1. Schmidt M, Pollhammer MS, Januszyk M, Duscher D, Huemer GMConcomitant liposuction reduces complications of vertical medial thigh lift in massive weight loss patients.Plast Reconstr Surg20161371748–1757
Back to Top | Article Outline

GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article’s publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Letters submitted should pose a specific question that clarifies a point that either was not made in the article or was unclear, and therefore a response from the corresponding author of the article is requested.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

The Journal requests that individuals submit no more than five (5) letters to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in a calendar year.

©2017American Society of Plastic Surgeons