Similarly, if the symptoms are present after the tissue expander has been exchanged for a permanent implant, the condition of the overlying skin may again help guide treatment decisions. If patients with permanent implants and a history of radiation therapy experience pain/tightness, but do not demonstrate severe stigma of irradiation in the overlying skin, they might be successfully treated by one of the measures previously described. However, if the overlying skin appears tight and hard, the pain and tightness will likely not resolve without explantation or the addition of autologous tissue. Having this added level of specificity should improve accuracy of diagnosis and ultimately help all clinicians and researchers involved with this challenging condition.
Elliot M. Hirsch, M.D.
Akhil K. Seth, M.D.
Neil A. Fine, M.D.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
The authors have no financial interest in any of the products mentioned in this article. They received no funding from the manufacturers of any products mentioned in this paper, and have no corporate or financial affiliations with the manufacturers.
1. Adams WP Jr, Rios JL, Smith SJ. Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: Six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:46S–52S.
2. Del Pozo JL, Tran NV, Petty PM, et al.. Pilot study of association of bacteria on breast implants with capsular contracture. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:1333–1337.
3. Tamboto H, Vickery K, Deva AK. Subclinical (biofilm) infection causes capsular contracture in a porcine model following augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:835–842.
4. Lipa JE, Qiu W, Huang N, Alman BA, Pang CY. Pathogenesis of radiation-induced capsular contracture in tissue expander and implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:437–445.
5. Spear SL, Baker JL Jr. Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:1119–1123; discussion 1124.
Viewpoints, pertaining to issues of general interest, are welcome, even if they are not related to items previously published. Viewpoints may present unique techniques, brief technology updates, technical notes, and so on. Viewpoints will be published on a space-available basis because they are typically less timesensitive than Letters and other types of articles. Please note the following criteria:
* Text—maximum of 500 words (not including references)
* References—maximum of five
* Authors—no more than five
* Figures/Tables—no more than two figures and/or one table
Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Viewpoints should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/. We strongly encourage authors to submit figures in color.
We reserve the right to edit Viewpoints to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content must be disclosed. Submission of a Viewpoint constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and assignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.
The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Viewpoints represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.