Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 2012 - Volume 129 - Issue 3 > FaceTime with Apple and Information Technology
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery:
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182419a98
Letters

FaceTime with Apple and Information Technology

Shah, Ajul M.D.; Tuggle, Charles M.D.; Clune, James E. M.D.; Steinbacher, Derek M.D., D.M.D.; Patel, Anup M.D., M.B.A.

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.

Correspondence to Dr. Patel, Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. anup.patel@yale.edu

Back to Top | Article Outline

Sir:

FaceTime, an application found on the iPhone 4 and iPad from Apple, Inc. (Cupertino, Calif.), allows users to experience real-time video conferencing on their cellular device. With the click of one or two buttons, users are connected face-to-face in any location that has Internet service. As described in an article in Vein Therapy News, a surgeon at the University of Arizona's Southern Arizona Limb Salvage Alliance was able to instantly connect with the associate director of Valley Presbyterian Hospital Amputation Prevention Center in Los Angeles for a real-time wound consultation.1 Evaluation of more emergent issues with the assistance of video consultation has been shown to achieve higher diagnostic accuracy in other fields, including neurosurgery.2 This technology can profoundly impact the field of plastic surgery, increasing its outreach throughout medicine.

Figure. No caption a...
Figure. No caption a...
Image Tools

The evaluation of a wound is one of the most frequent consultations received by any plastic surgery service or surgeon. Initial, over-the-phone recommendations are often held until the surgeon has physically “laid eyes” on the wound. Discrepancy between the initial description of the wound and the severity of the defect can handicap prioritization of consultations and diminishes efficiency. FaceTime and similar programs address these shortcomings by taking advantage of “newer, digital, dynamic, image-based learning” that can increase the dissemination of plastic surgery knowledge.3

Since the release of some of the first camera/mobile phone combined devices, text messaging of images has been used as a means of communicating photographs of wounds. Although we have found this to be of great benefit at our institution, photographs do not allow real-time manipulation of camera angles, nor do they allow for real-time conversation with the patient or consulting physician. Very little regarding functional status, such as range of motion or strength, can be ascertained from still images. As Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery releases applications to enhance its visual and auditory content beyond static text and pictures, we believe that the same technology will augment the practice of seeing wound consultations.

A role for video consultation has already been identified in numerous Internet-based programs that facilitate direct physician-to-physician interaction. Such programs have been used in different settings, including real-time consultation between Level I trauma centers and rural community hospitals.4 Unfortunately, application of these systems has been limited by the need for transportable computers, cameras, and software. However, with FaceTime, the hardware and software infrastructure—the absence of which has been prohibitive in the past—is already in place.

Using this technology, the plastic surgeon can visualize the important details necessary in evaluation and can thereby give initial recommendations without delay. The plastic surgeon is then more likely to effectively delegate responsibilities to different members of the wound care team. The evaluation of amputations, for example, could take place with wound-specific initial instructions to the patient and providers remotely. Mobilization of appropriate resources before patient arrival may increase efficiency while decreasing costs and optimizing patient outcomes.

Indeed, nothing will replace being at the patient's bedside. The hope is that this technology equips plastic surgeons in ways that provide more time to be with those patients who need our specialty the most.

Ajul Shah, M.D.

Charles Tuggle, M.D.

James E. Clune, M.D.

Derek Steinbacher, M.D., D.M.D.

Anup Patel, M.D., M.B.A.

Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Surgeons use iPhone 4 video app for real-time long distance consult. Vein Therapy News. Available at http://veintherapynews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=247&Itemid=1. Accessed September 19, 2011.

2. Wong HT, Poon WS, Jacobs P, et al.. The comparative impact of video consultation on emergency neurosurgical referrals. Neurosurgery 2006;59:607–613.

3. Rohrich RJ, Sullivan D, Tynan E, Abramson K. Introducing the new PRS iPad app: The new world of plastic surgery education. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:799–802.

4. Rogers FB, Ricci M, Caputo M, et al.. The use of telemedicine for real-time video consultation between trauma center and community hospital in a rural setting improves early trauma care: Preliminary results. J Trauma 2001;51:1037–1041.

Back to Top | Article Outline
GUIDELINES

Letters to the Editor, discussing material recently published in the Journal, are welcome. They will have the best chance of acceptance if they are received within 8 weeks of an article's publication. Letters to the Editor may be published with a response from the authors of the article being discussed. Discussions beyond the initial letter and response will not be published. Letters submitted pertaining to published Discussions of articles will not be printed. Letters to the Editor are not usually peer reviewed, but the Journal may invite replies from the authors of the original publication. All Letters are published at the discretion of the Editor.

Letters submitted should pose a specific question that clarifies a point that either was not made in the article or was unclear, and therefore a response from the corresponding author of the article is requested.

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Letters should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/.

We reserve the right to edit Letters to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a Letter constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and asignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Letters to the Editor represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

The Journal requests that individuals submit no more than five (5) letters to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in a calendar year.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 1 time(s).

Archives of Surgery
Association of Postdischarge Complications With Reoperation and Mortality in General Surgery
Kazaure, HS; Roman, SA; Sosa, JA
Archives of Surgery, 147(): 1000-1007.

Back to Top | Article Outline

©2012American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Login

Article Tools

Images

Share


The Clinical Masters of PRS – Breast eBooks
4 Essential eBooks for Plastic Surgeons