Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery:
Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; University of Chicago; Chicago, Ill.
Correspondence to Dr. Dorafshar; Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; University of Chicago; 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 6035; Chicago, Ill. 60637; firstname.lastname@example.org
One of the primary missions of an academic medical center is to train future physicians. However, because of ever-increasing economic pressures, the drive to maximize efficiency in our practices is being emphasized. Unfortunately, this can threaten our role as teachers. As a result, a simple, reproducible method of teaching medical students and junior surgical residents how to perform a basic running subcuticular (or intracuticular) suture was developed.
Although the running subcuticular suture is well described in surgical textbooks,1 the “four-step method” is unique in that it separates and quantifies each component. With the first step, the skin is gently everted using an Adson forceps to visualize the dermal-epidermal junction (Fig. 1, above, left). Step two consists of introducing the needle at a 90-degree angle at the dermal-epidermal junction and pronating the wrist to take a deep horizontal bite parallel to the skin surface (Fig. 1, above, right). In step three, the needle is stabilized with the Adson forceps, being mindful of not touching the tip, and advanced through the skin (Fig. 1, below, left). In this step, it is important to emphasize to the student that the Adson forceps can be used more effectively by firmly gripping the needle at more of a right angle to it, allowing more contact and thus success with grasping the needle, without dulling the needle by manipulating the tip. Finally, in step four, while continuing to stabilize the needle with the Adson forceps, the needle is replaced in the needle holder in the appropriate position for the next throw (Fig. 1, below, right). It should be highlighted that in this step the operator should stabilize the hand holding the needle with the Adson forceps on the patient's body close to the area from the last throw while releasing and reloading with the needle holder, to minimize the difficulty in reloading the needle holder in the correct position for the next throw.
Once the student grasps the concept of each of the four steps, the instructor begins to count aloud as the student performs each of the four steps. Each movement performed by the student is given a number (i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and so on), illustrating extraneous movements. The immediate feedback provided by having the instructor count aloud has been critical in helping students at our institution master this skill and improve their efficiency by removing extraneous movements. Once the basic concept is grasped, the four-step method can be modified as necessary for the advancing surgeon.
In conclusion, the four-step method is a quick, simple, and easily reproducible method of teaching medical students and junior residents how to perform a basic running subcuticular suture. We believe that its simplicity will serve as a valuable tool for surgeons to maintain their efficiency in the operating room while still fulfilling their role as teachers.
The authors have no financial interests to disclose and there were no external sources of funding provided for this project.
Kelly Retzlaff, A.P.N.
Shailesh Agarwal, B.S.
David H. Song, M.D., M.B.A.
Amir H. Dorafshar, M.B.Ch.B.
Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
University of Chicago
1. Thorne CH. Techniques and principles in plastic surgery. In: Grabb and Smith's Plastic Surgery
. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007:5–6.
Viewpoints, pertaining to issues of general interest, are welcome, even if they are not related to items previously published. Viewpoints may present unique techniques, brief technology updates, technical notes, and so on. Viewpoints will be published on a space-available basis because they are typically less timesensitive than Letters and other types of articles. Please note the following criteria:
* Text—maximum of 500 words (not including references)
* References—maximum of five
* Authors—no more than five
* Figures/Tables—no more than two figures and/or one table
Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Viewpoints should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/. We strongly encourage authors to submit figures in color.
We reserve the right to edit Viewpoints to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content must be disclosed. Submission of a Viewpoint constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and assignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.
The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Viewpoints represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.