Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2008 - Volume 122 - Issue 1 > Aquamid: Where Is the Reality?
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery:
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181774619
Viewpoints

Aquamid: Where Is the Reality?

Abenavoli, Fabio M. M.D.; Servili, Andrea M.D.; Corelli, Roberto M.S.

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

“San Pietro” Hospital; Fatebenefratelli; Rome, Italy

Correspondence to Dr. Abenavoli; Via Savoia 72; 00198 Rome, Italy; f.abenavoli@mclink.it

Sir:

Figure. No caption a...
Image Tools

When we read the numerous accounts of the astonishing results obtained by so many colleagues through the use of Aquamid (Ferrosan, Soeborg, Denmark) infiltrations, to treat depressed areas, for example, or to raise deep wrinkles of the face for aesthetic purposes, it occurs to us to think that the cases that sometimes come to our attention are absolutely rare.

Aquamid is a soft-tissue filler, a transparent polyacrylamide gel consisting of approximately 2.5% cross-linked polyacrylamide and 97.5% apyrogenic water. It is used for soft-tissue augmentation and contour correction, with minimal reports of significant complications after injection into the face.1–5 After discussing personal experience with other colleagues who report an increasing number of such cases, multiplied by the large number of practicing surgeons just in Rome, we think that many cases, really, have not been reported, certainly not intentionally, possibly because the patients did not return for follow-up.

Just to give an example, we present the case of a 30-year-old woman who presented with a swollen area that included the entire right cheek as far as the inferior palpebral region (Fig. 1). The patient had sustained an injury to the face years earlier and had already undergone numerous reparative operations, with results, according to the patient, that were not completely acceptable. Consequently, to correct a depression of the operated area, the patient had undergone treatment by infiltration of an indeterminate quantity of injectable polyacrylamide. Approximately 3 years after the operation, however, the patient noticed swelling that was fluctuant and, as time passed, tended to increasingly move into a dependent position. A magnetic resonance imaging study confirmed the presence of the material previously infiltrated and revealed no other noteworthy findings. The patient underwent surgery, during which the same preauricular incision was used that had been used during one of the previous operations. After a brief, blunt subcutaneous dissection, an area was reached that appeared fluctuant; it was lined by an easily lacerable membrane of reactive tissue and contained some pasty liquid material, exactly corresponding to the methacrylate placed previously (Fig. 2). We removed the methacrylate together with the lining capsule, which appeared, however, to be tenaciously adherent to the underlying tissue planes. Taking into consideration the patient’s need to maintain adequate filling of the area (which intraoperatively was deprived of the polyacrylamide support and again appeared depressed), we proceeded to prepare a dermoadipose graft, by drawing from the inguinal region and fixing it in the subcutaneous site. The patient had an optimal postoperative period and at 3 months after the operation showed an optimal result even in terms of aesthetic appearance. A certain degree of reabsorption of the inserted graft is probably to be expected, but this can be remedied by lipofilling over the next few years.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools

We wish, therefore, to emphasize the possible problems related to the use of so many foreign materials that perhaps are too easily used ever more frequently because of statistics and results that may overstate their success.

Fabio M. Abenavoli, M.D.

Andrea Servili, M.D.

Roberto Corelli, M.S.

“San Pietro” Hospital

Fatebenefratelli

Rome, Italy

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. von Buelow, S., von Heimburg, D., and Pallua, N. Efficacy and safety of polyacrylamide hydrogel for facial soft-tissue augmentation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 116: 1137, 2005.

2. Christensen, L., Breiting, V., Janssen, M., Vuust, J., and Hogdall, E. Adverse reactions to injectable soft tissue permanent fillers. Br. J. Dermatol. 154: 755, 2006.

3. Amin, S. P., Marmur, E. S., and Goldberg, D. J. Complications from injectable polyacrylamide gel, a new nonbiodegradable soft tissue filler. Dermatol. Surg. 30: 1507, 2004.

4. De Cassia Novaes, W., and Berg, A. Experiences with a new nonbiodegradable hydrogel (Aquamid): A pilot study. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 27: 425, 2003.

5. Breiting, V., Aasted, A., Jorgensen, A., Opitz, P., and Rosetzsky, A. A study on patients treated with polyacrylamide hydrogel injection for facial corrections. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 28: 45, 2004.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Section Description

GUIDELINES

Viewpoints, pertaining to issues of general interest, are welcome, even if they are not related to items previously published. Viewpoints may present unique techniques, brief technology updates, technical notes, and so on. Viewpoints will be published on a space-available basis because they are typically less timesensitive than Letters and other types of articles. Please note the following criteria:

* Text—maximum of 500 words (not including references)

* References—maximum of five

* Authors—no more than five

* Figures/Tables—no more than two figures and/or one table

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Viewpoints should be submitted electronically via PRS' enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/. We strongly encourage authors to submit figures in color.

We reserve the right to edit letters and viewpoints to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content of the correspondence must be disclosed. Submission of a letter and/or viewpoint constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and assignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the letters to the Editor and viewpoints represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 1 time(s).

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Reply
Abenavoli, FM
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 123(5): 1634-1635.
10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a2060e
PDF (579) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

©2008American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Login

Article Tools

Images

Share


The Clinical Masters of PRS – Breast eBooks
4 Essential eBooks for Plastic Surgeons