Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

The Impact of Travel Distance on Breast Reconstruction in the United States

Albornoz, Claudia R. M.D., M.Sc.; Cohen, Wess A. M.D.; Razdan, Shantanu N. M.D., M.S.P.H.; Mehrara, Babak J. M.D.; McCarthy, Colleen M. M.D., M.S.; Disa, Joseph J. M.D.; Dayan, Joseph H. M.D.; Pusic, Andrea L. M.D., M.H.S.; Cordeiro, Peter G. M.D.; Matros, Evan M.D., M.M.Sc.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery: January 2016 - Volume 137 - Issue 1 - p 12–18
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001847
Breast: Original Articles
Watch Video
Press Release

Background: Inadequate access to breast reconstruction was a motivating factor underlying passage of the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act. It remains unclear whether all patients interested in breast reconstruction undergo this procedure. The aim of this study was to determine whether geographic disparities are present that limit the rate and method of postmastectomy reconstruction.

Methods: Travel distance in miles between the patient’s residence and the hospital reporting the case was used as a quantitative measure of geographic disparities. The American College of Surgeons National Cancer Database was queried for mastectomy with or without reconstruction performed from 1998 to 2011. Reconstructive procedures were categorized as implant or autologous techniques. Standard statistical tests including linear regression were performed.

Results: Patients who underwent breast reconstruction had to travel farther than those who had mastectomy alone (p < 0.01). A linear correlation was demonstrated between travel distance and reconstruction rates (p < 0.01). The mean distances traveled by patients who underwent reconstruction at community, comprehensive community, or academic programs were 10.3, 19.9, and 26.2 miles, respectively (p < 0.01). Reconstruction rates were significantly greater at academic programs. Patients traveled farther to undergo autologous compared with prosthetic reconstruction.

Conclusions: Although greater patient awareness and insurance coverage have contributed to increased breast reconstruction rates in the United States, the presence of geographic barriers suggests an unmet need. Academic programs have the greatest reconstruction rates, but are located farther from patients’ residences. Increasing the number of plastics surgeons, especially in community centers, would be one method of addressing this inequality.

New York, N.Y.

From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Received for publication March 6, 2015; accepted August 18, 2015.

The first two authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co–first authors.

Disclosure: The authors have no financial disclosures in relation to the content of this article. No specific funding was used for this research.

A “Hot Topic Video” by Editor-in-Chief Rod J. Rohrich, M.D., accompanies this article. Go to PRSJournal.com and click on “Plastic Surgery Hot Topics” in the “Videos” tab to watch.” On the iPad, tap on the Hot Topics icon.

Evan Matros, M.D., M.M.Sc., Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, MRI 1036, New York, N.Y. 10065, matrose@mskcc.org

©2016American Society of Plastic Surgeons