Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 2014 - Volume 133 - Issue 4 > Using Propensity Score Analysis to Compare Major Complicatio...
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery:
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000024
Breast: Original Articles

Using Propensity Score Analysis to Compare Major Complications between DIEP and Free Muscle-Sparing TRAM Flap Breast Reconstructions

Zhong, Toni M.D., M.H.S.; Novak, Christine B. Ph.D.; Bagher, Shaghayegh M.Sc.; Maass, Saskia W. M. C. M.D.; Zhang, Jing M.D.; Arad, Udi M.D.; O’Neill, Anne C. M.D., Ph.D.; Metcalfe, Kelly A. R.N., Ph.D.; Hofer, Stefan O. P. M.D., Ph.D.

Collapse Box


Background: Previous studies comparing muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) versus deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) free flaps have not considered procedure selection bias. Propensity score analysis provides a statistical approach to consider preoperative factors in flap selection, and was used to compare major complications (breast and abdominal) between these microsurgical breast reconstruction (free muscle-sparing TRAM versus DIEP).

Methods: This study evaluated major breast and abdominal complications in 292 consecutive patients (428 free abdominal flaps). Propensity scores were calculated for patient differences affecting flap selection (DIEP versus free muscle-sparing TRAM). Multivariate logistic models using selected covariates separately analyzed breast and abdominal complications between flap methods.

Results: There were 83 major complications (28 percent): breast, 20 percent; abdomen, 8 percent. Using propensity scores, the adjusted odds of abdominal complications were significantly higher in free muscle-sparing TRAM than in DIEP flaps (OR, 2.73; 95 percent CI, 1.01 to 7.07). With prior chemotherapy, body mass index significantly increased abdominal complications (OR, 1.16; 95 percent CI, 1.01 to 1.34). Using propensity scores, there was no significant association between reconstruction method and breast complications; diabetics had significantly increased breast complications (OR, 4.19; 95 percent CI, 1.14 to 15.98). Previous abdominal operations (OR, 1.77; 95 percent CI, 0.96 to 3.30) and immediate reconstruction (OR, 1.86; 95 percent CI, 0.94 to 3.71) approached significance.

Conclusions: Propensity score analysis indicated significantly higher abdominal complications in free muscle-sparing TRAM compared with DIEP flaps. This study highlights the importance of separately evaluating recipient breast and donor abdominal complications and use of propensity scores to minimize procedure selection bias.


©2014American Society of Plastic Surgeons


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

The Clinical Masters of PRS – Breast eBooks

4 Essential eBooks for Plastic Surgeons