Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Immediate Placement of Implants in Breast Reconstruction: Patient Selection and Outcomes

Roostaeian, Jason M.D.; Pavone, Lucio M.D.; Da Lio, Andrew M.D.; Lipa, Joan M.D.; Festekjian, Jaco M.D.; Crisera, Christopher M.D.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery: April 2011 - Volume 127 - Issue 4 - pp 1407-1416
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318208d0ea
Breast: Original Articles
Press Release

Background: With the advent of skin-sparing mastectomy techniques, it became clear that immediate placement of an implant could be utilized for breast reconstruction in select patients. The authors assessed the safety, patient selection factors, and aesthetic results with this technique.

Methods: Thirty-five consecutive patients (eight unilateral and 27 bilateral) who underwent immediate implant-based breast reconstruction were analyzed. Patient data and complication rates were obtained from a retrospective chart review. Postoperative photographs were evaluated by a blinded panel and scored on a four-point scale.

Results: With a mean follow-up of 15 months, complications occurred in six patients (17.1 percent). There was one episode (2.9 percent) of skin necrosis resulting in implant loss, two episodes (5.7 percent) of postoperative infection, both of which resulted in implant salvage, and three patients who developed capsular contracture (8.5 percent). A total of 13 patients (37 percent) required additional surgery for revision. Revisions were necessary significantly more commonly in patients with a history of radiotherapy (p = 0.047), D-cup breast size or greater (p = 0.018), and ptosis of grade 2 or more (p = 0.017). The mean overall aesthetic score was 3.19, and upon subgroup analysis, patients with a history of radiation treatment (2.46), D-cup breast size or greater (2.64), and ptosis or grade 2 or more (2.98) had lower mean scores. Exclusion of these subgroups resulted in a mean score 3.39.

Conclusions: Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction is a safe and viable option that can provide a very good aesthetic result in appropriately selected candidates. The authors recommend caution and appropriate patient counseling in patients with a history of radiotherapy, larger breasts, and/or ptotic breasts.

Los Angeles, Calif.

From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles.

Received for publication July 7, 2010; accepted September 24, 2010.

Disclosure: Dr. Crisera serves on the speakers bureau for LifeCell Corporation. The other authors have no financial information to disclose.

Christopher Crisera, M.D., Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, 200 Medical Plaza, Suite 465, Los Angeles, Calif. 90095

©2011American Society of Plastic Surgeons