You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

The Rationale for Direct Linear Closure of Facial Mohs' Defects

Soliman, Sameer B.S.; Hatef, Daniel A. M.D.; Hollier, Larry H. Jr. M.D.; Thornton, James F. M.D.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery:
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f95978
Reconstructive: Head and Neck: Original Articles
Abstract

Background: Closing Mohs' defects is a challenging undertaking for surgeons. There are many methods, including linear repair, local flaps, and skin grafts. Traditionally, geometric flaps have been a mainstay, particularly in the cheek and forehead. However, many flaps violate basic principles of following relaxed skin tension lines; also, they often necessitate significant dissection.

Methods: All repairs of Mohs' facial defects performed sequentially from 2001 to 2008 by the senior author (J.F.T.) were reviewed. Chart review identified the size and location of the defect, method of closure, and complications.

Results: Chart review revealed 1354 reconstructions, with 475 direct repairs (35 percent). The highest rate of direct repair was seen in the forehead (77 percent). The lowest rate of direct repair was seen in the nose (7 percent). Analysis of cases revealed good results, with very low morbidity for direct linear closure.

Conclusions: For many large defects, the simple method of direct linear closure often yields results superior to those of more time-consuming local flap options. Several dogmas of facial reconstruction are too unyielding, and the option of direct repair should not be overlooked. Traditional estimates of defect size requiring flap repair are incorrect; it is possible to close some large defects by direct approximation, with superior results.

In Brief

CODING PERSPECTIVE FOR THIS ARTICLE IS ON PAGE 149.

Author Information

Dallas and Houston, Texas

From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine.

Received for publication May 7, 2009; accepted July 29, 2009.

Disclosure: The authors have no conflicting commercial associations or any financial interests pertinent to this article.

Daniel A. Hatef, M.D.; Department of Plastic Surgery; 6621 Fannin Street; Houston, Texas 77030

©2011American Society of Plastic Surgeons