You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

Diced Cartilage Grafts in Rhinoplasty Surgery: Current Techniques and Applications

Daniel, Rollin K. M.D.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery:
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818d2104
Cosmetic: Original Articles
Abstract

Background: The author has used diced cartilage grafts in nasal surgery for more than 30 years. However, the number of cases and the variety of techniques have increased dramatically over the past 6 years.

Methods: The author uses three methods of diced cartilage in rhinoplasty surgery: diced cartilage, diced cartilage wrapped in fascia (with fascia then sewn closed), and diced cartilage covered with fascia (with the recipient area covered with fascia after graft placement). The constructs are highly varied to fit the specific defect. Pieces of diced cartilage without any fascia can be placed in pockets in the peripyriform area, radix, or alongside structural rib grafts.

Results: Over a 2-year period, the author treated 546 rhinoplasty cases in which 79 patients (14 percent) had a total of 91 diced cartilage grafts. There were 34 primary and 45 secondary operations involving the radix (n = 11), half-length grafts (n = 14), full-length dorsum (n = 43), peripyriform (n = 16), infralobule (n = 4), and lateral wall (n = 3). All charts were reviewed for the 256 rhinoplasties performed in 2006 of which 30 patients had 35 diced cartilage grafts. With a median follow-up of 19 months (range, 13 to 25 months), two patients had had revisions unrelated to their diced cartilage grafts. The three most common technical problems were overcorrection, visibility, and junctional step-offs.

Conclusions: Diced cartilage grafts are a valuable addition to rhinoplasty surgery. They are highly flexible and useful throughout the nose. Their use simplifies one of the greatest challenges in all of rhinoplasty—dorsal augmentation. Complications have been relatively minor and their correction relatively simple.

Author Information

Newport Beach, Calif.

From private practice.

Received for publication February 22, 2008; accepted May 20, 2008.

Presented, in part, at the Annual Meeting of the Rhinoplasty Society, in New York, New York, April 19, 2007.

Disclosure: The author has no commercial associations or financial interests that might pose or create a conflict of interest with information presented in this article.

Rollin K. Daniel, M.D., 1441 Avocado Avenue, Suite 308, Newport Beach, Calif. 92660, rkdaniel@aol.com

©2008American Society of Plastic Surgeons