Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 1979 - Volume 64 - Issue 3 > Bone Formation by Revascularized Periosteal and Bone Grafts,...
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery:
Article: PDF Only

Bone Formation by Revascularized Periosteal and Bone Grafts, Compared With Traditional Bone Grafts.

Puckett, Charles L. M.D.; Hurvitz, James S. M.D.; Metzler, Michael H. M.D.; Silver, Donald M.D.

Collapse Box

Abstract

SUMMARY: Three groups of dogs were studied to compare the bone formation obtained with traditional bone grafting techniques, and that obtained with revascularized periosteum or revascularized bone grafts-all in unstressed bone. Revascularized periosteum did not produce a significant amount of bone in this unstressed model. At 4 months the revascularized rib grafts had a slightly greater tolerance to stress at the callus site than traditional bone grafts, but the incidence of nonunion was the same.

We conclude that the use of revascularized bone grafts should be reserved for situations in which traditional bone grafting techniques are unlikely to be successful.

(C)1979American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Login

Article Tools

Share


The Clinical Masters of PRS – Breast eBooks
4 Essential eBooks for Plastic Surgeons