Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 2009 - Volume 28 - Issue 4 > Failure of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Enzyme Immunoassay t...
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal:
April 2009 - Volume 28 - Issue 4 - pp 273-276
doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31818e03b4
Original Studies

Failure of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Enzyme Immunoassay to Rule Out Infection Among Polymerase Chain Reaction-Negative Vietnamese Infants at 12 Months of Age

Sohn, Annette H. MD; Thanh, Tran Chi MSc; Thinh, Le Quoc MD; Khanh, Truong Huu MD; Thu, Huynh Khanh BS; Giang, Le Truong MD, PhD; Lien, Truong Xuan PhD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that >90% of HIV-uninfected infants serorevert, as seen in the results of enzyme immunoassay (EIA) testing by 12 months of age, making it feasible to confirm or rule out infection. We assessed the reliability of EIA in a cohort of Vietnamese infants.

Methods: HIV-exposed, uninfected infants enrolled in a parent diagnostic and monitoring study from February 2005 through August 2006 were eligible for inclusion in a prospective cohort study of HIV-EIA performance. Testing using 2 standard assays (Genscreen HIV 1/2 version 2, Bio-Rad; Murex 1.2.0, Murex Biotech) was initiated at 12 months of age. Infants were categorized as EIA-negative (seroreverted; negative Genscreen), EIA-indeterminate (positive Genscreen, negative Murex), or EIA-positive (Genscreen and Murex positive).

Results: Of 273 infants included in the study, 59 (22%) were EIA-negative at 12 months, 131 (48%) were indeterminate, and 83 (30%) were EIA-positive; specificity 21.6 (95% confidence interval: 16.6, 26.3). Infants with positive EIAs at 12 months were 74% more likely than EIA-indeterminate infants to test indeterminate or positive at 18 months (risk ratio, 1.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.15, 2.64; P = 0.03).

Conclusions: Expectations regarding infant seroreversion by standard EIAs should be reassessed to reflect potential cross-regional differences in their performance.

© 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.