Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal:
3. Prevention and Treatment
Duration of Immunity Against Pertussis After Natural Infection or Vaccination
Wendelboe, Aaron M. MSPH*; Van Rie, Annelies MD, PhD*; Salmaso, Stefania PhD†; Englund, Janet A. MD‡
From the *Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; †Director of the National Cancer Centre for Epidemiology at the Italian National Institute of Health and the Laboratories of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy; and the ‡Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Address for correspondence: Aaron M. Wendelboe, Department of Epidemiology, McGavran-Greenberg Hall, University of North Carolina, CB# 7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435. E-mail firstname.lastname@example.org.
Despite decades of high vaccination coverage, pertussis has remained endemic and reemerged as a public health problem in many countries in the past 2 decades. Waning of vaccine-induced immunity has been cited as one of the reasons for the observed epidemiologic trend. A review of the published data on duration of immunity reveals estimates that infection-acquired immunity against pertussis disease wanes after 4–20 years and protective immunity after vaccination wanes after 4–12 years. Further research into the rate of waning of vaccine-acquired immunity will help determine the optimal timing and frequency of booster immunizations and their role in pertussis control.
Widespread immunization against pertussis was implemented with whole cell (wP) vaccines in the 1940s and 1950s in many industrialized countries. As a result, the incidence of reported pertussis cases decreased 99% in the United States by the 1970s.1 Despite continuous high immunization coverage rates in the United States and other industrialized countries, pertussis has remained endemic; and the incidence of reported pertussis disease has gradually increased after reaching a nadir in 1976.2 Waning of vaccine-acquired immunity and decreased opportunities for boosting of immunity because of reduced levels of circulation of Bordetella pertussis have been cited as some of the possible reasons for reemergence of pertussis.3–7
This article reviews data on the duration of immunity acquired by infection with B. pertussis, and duration of immunity acquired by vaccination with wP and acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines.
DURATION OF IMMUNITY ACQUIRED BY INFECTION WITH B. PERTUSSIS
Before the implementation of immunization programs, pertussis was widely recognized as a severe disease among children. The majority of reported cases occurred in children, and an estimated 80% of the population suffered from pertussis disease during childhood.8 Seroprevalence studies in largely unvaccinated populations indicate that almost all children (95%) become infected with pertussis by the age of 19 years.9 Selected articles describing the duration of potential protection afforded by infection are listed in Table 1.
Adults in the prevaccine era rarely presented with typical forms of pertussis.13 One study indicated that only 0.26% of a population of 20,405 persons had a second case of pertussis disease.10 It was therefore postulated that immunity from natural infection was close to lifelong.11,14 A more recent prospective study of household contacts in a largely unvaccinated population demonstrated that 33% of adult pertussis cases had a history of pertussis during childhood.11 Computer simulations of the prevaccine era by mathematical modeling estimate that, in 1940, everyone experienced pertussis as a child, 9% of the population had more than 1 typical pertussis episode, and the average adult experienced 2.6 cases of mild pertussis in his/her lifetime.15 The frequent occurrence of mildly symptomatic B. pertussis infections in adults refutes the previously held belief that infection-acquired immunity is lifelong.
Symptomatic reinfections with B. pertussis in children have only recently been reported, both in the Netherlands and in Senegal. A prospective cohort study in the Netherlands documented B. pertussis infection clinically and by laboratory techniques in both the first and reinfection episode in 4 children.7 The second episodes of pertussis were milder than first infections and may not have been diagnosed outside of a research setting. This study provided well-documented evidence that the duration of infection-acquired immunity in children may be as short as 3.5 years. A study in Senegal of 8419 children documented 2 episodes of confirmed symptomatic pertussis in 137 unvaccinated children (0.02% of 6131 children) and 73 previously vaccinated children (0.03% of 2288 children).16 The mean time between the first and second infections was 7.1 years [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 6.6–7.6)] in the unvaccinated children and 5.1 years (95% CI 4.5–5.7) in the previously vaccinated children.
The current estimates of the duration of infection-acquired immunity range from 7–10 years12,16 to 20 years.11 These widely different results could be the result of differences in levels of circulating B. pertussis, surveillance systems and case definitions used.
DURATION OF IMMUNITY ACQUIRED BY wP VACCINATION
Estimates of the duration of immunity acquired after wP vaccination range from 4 to 12 years (Table 2). 5,6,13,14,17–21 These estimates have been derived indirectly from various studies, none of which was designed primarily to study the duration of immunity.
Estimates of duration of immunity after vaccination have been most frequently based on 2 studies.13,17 Lambert13 reported on a 1962 outbreak in Michigan, in which 195 cases of B. pertussis infection were identified from 474 household members. Vaccination history was collected, and attack rates were calculated, demonstrating that 95% of the attacks had occurred within 12 years since the last dose of wP vaccine. Jenkinson,17 a private physician in the United Kingdom, studied a semirural community consisting of 11,500 people for a period of 10 years and identified 436 cases of pertussis. Vaccine efficacy was calculated for each age group by excluding the unvaccinated cases and subtracting the attack rate (number of cases divided by the number at risk) from 1. Although children from each age group would have been born in different years, each age group was treated as its own cohort. He estimated that by 4 years after immunization, only 52% of the children still had a clinically protective level of immunity against pertussis.
A recent study based on Australian notification data investigated the effect of age at administration of last vaccine dose on the average age of childhood pertussis cases. Australia introduced a fifth dose of wP vaccine at 4–5 years of age in late 1994. In 1997 the peak rate of disease was among 8- to 9-year-olds, whereas in 2001 the peak rate of disease was in 12- to 13-year-olds. This study thus provides evidence that immunity acquired by wP vaccination wanes 6–9 years after the last dose.5
Although vaccine efficacy studies have demonstrated that there is no loss of protective immunity after wP vaccination during the first 2 years after vaccination,22 asymptomatic infections have been reported to occur within the first year after vaccination with wP vaccine.23 This indicates that the duration of protective immunity against disease lasts longer than the immunity against infection.
DURATION OF IMMUNITY ACQUIRED BY aP VACCINATION
In the 1990s, aP vaccine efficacy trials were conducted in various countries. In the United States, the first aP vaccine was licensed for use in 1997. Although aP vaccines were only recently introduced, some published reports on the duration of immunity are available. Results suggest that the duration of protective immunity after vaccination with aP vaccines is not substantially different from that after vaccination with wP vaccines (Table 3).
A prospective surveillance study of participants of a vaccine efficacy study comparing 2 aP vaccines demonstrated sustained efficacy of 86% for typical pertussis and 76–78% for mild pertussis during the first 6 years of life (ie, >5 years after the last dose).4 A case-contact study nested in a vaccine efficacy trial demonstrated a difference in vaccine efficacy between the aP and wP vaccines. Whereas in children 18 months-4 years old, the pertussis incidence rate was higher in those vaccinated with aP vaccine than in those vaccinated with wP vaccine [incidence rate ratio (IRR), 1.76; 95% CI 1.33–2.33], there was no difference in the incidence rate in children younger than 18 months old (IRR 1.13; 95% CI 0.66–1.95). This may suggest a longer duration of protective immunity acquired by wP vaccination than by aP vaccination.24
In contrast, 2 studies monitoring the long term effectiveness of pertussis vaccines did not find a difference between the duration of immunity after aP (2-component JNIH-6) and wP vaccine (monovalent Wellcome). In a Swedish 10-year follow-up study, 13% of the study population acquired pertussis infection, with a median age of 5.5 years after the last dose, irrespective of type of vaccine.25 In a German 6-year follow-up study of wP and aP vaccines (produced by Wyeth-Lederle), the calculated efficacy for the 6-year follow-up period was 89% (95% CI 79–94) for the aP vaccine and 92% (95% CI 84–96) for the wP vaccine.26
LIMITATIONS IN ADDRESSING DURATION OF IMMUNITY
There are many limitations in our understanding of the duration of immunity after both natural infection and vaccination. No clear serologic marker exists for protective immunity against pertussis. By ∼2 years postinfection or postvaccination with either wP or aP vaccine, antibodies have reached barely detectable levels,27–30 whereas immunity against infection remains.
Studies have not been able to control for levels of circulating B. pertussis in the population. This may be important because asymptomatic infections will boost the level of immunity and can thus lead to an overestimation of the duration of protection against symptomatic disease. Pertussis vaccine efficacy studies have demonstrated a decrease in the transmission of B. pertussis infection from vaccinees to household contacts.22,31,32 Observational studies have demonstrated a decrease in B. pertussis incidence rates in unvaccinated subgroups when vaccination coverage is >80%.14,33–35 The indirect effect (or herd immunity) has also not been taken into account in vaccine efficacy studies.
Another limitation of follow-up of vaccine efficacy trials lies in the difficulty of separating vaccine efficacy from waning immunity. If the efficacy of the vaccine is 85%, and there is a 20% age-specific attack rate in a highly vaccinated population, waning of immunity may have contributed to the occurrence of disease in 5% rather than 20% of the population. Nonetheless the potential overall impact on the population remains considerable.
Several factors further contribute to the difficulty in measuring the persistence of immunity and limit comparability between studies: the use of different vaccines (even within the groups of wP or aP vaccines); changes in manufacturing or vaccine contents over time; the presence of different immunization schedules (in timing and/or number of dosages); and utilization of different case definitions, surveillance methods and reporting systems.
Despite the limitations in measuring persistence of immunity to pertussis disease after natural infection or vaccination, some common themes have emerged. Protective immunity after infection was probably never lifelong and wanes after 7–20 years. Duration of immunity after either wP or aP immunization does not appear to substantially differ and likely lasts 4–12 years in children. Clear differences between immunity after vaccination and disease are difficult to distinguish based on available published data.
The interplay between waning immunity and boosting of pertussis immunity by B. pertussis infection and vaccination influences the epidemiology of pertussis and its transmission dynamics in the population. Further research into the rate of waning of vaccine-acquired immunity will help determine the optimal age and frequency of booster immunizations and their role in pertussis control.
1. Bass JW, Stephenson SR. The return of pertussis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987;6:141–144.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pertussis: United States, 1997–2000. MMWR. 2002;51:73–76.
3. Black S. Epidemiology of pertussis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;16(suppl):S85–S89.
4. Salmaso S, Mastrantonio P, Tozzi AE, et al. Sustained efficacy during the first 6 years of life of 3-component acellular pertussis vaccines administered in infancy: the Italian experience. Pediatrics. 2001;108:E81.
5. Torvaldsen S, McIntyre PB. Effect of the preschool pertussis booster on national notifications of disease in Australia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22:956–959.
6. Van Buynder PG, Owen D, Vurdien JE, Andrews NJ, Matthews RC, Miller E. Bordetella pertussis surveillance in England and Wales: 1995–7. Epidemiol Infect. 1999;123:403–411.
7. Versteegh FG, Schellekens JF, Nagelkerke AF, Roord JJ. Laboratory-confirmed reinfections with Bordetella pertussis. Acta Paediatr. 2002;91:95–97.
8. Gordon J, Hood R. Whooping cough and its epidemiological anomalies. Prev Med Epidemiol. 1951;222:333–361.
9. Giammanco A, Chiarini A, Stroffolini T, et al. Seroepidemiology of pertussis in Italy. Rev Infect Dis. 1991;13:1216–1220.
10. Laing J, Hay M. Public Health. 1902;14:584.
11. Wirsing von König CH, Postels-Multani S, Bock HL, Schmitt HJ. Pertussis in adults: frequency of transmission after household exposure. Lancet. 1995;346:1326–1329.
12. Miller E, Gay NJ. Epidemiological determinants of pertussis. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:15–23.
13. Lambert HJ. Epidemiology of a small pertussis outbreak in Kent County, Michigan. Public Health Rep. 1965;80:365–369.
14. Nielsen A, Larsen SO. Epidemiology of pertussis in Denmark: the impact of herd immunity. Int J Epidemiol. 1994;23:1300–1308.
15. Hethcote HW. An age-structured model for pertussis transmission. Math Biosci. 1997;145:89–136.
16. Broutin H, Simondon F, Rohani P, Guégan JF, Grenfell BT. Loss of immunity to pertussis in a rural community in Senegal. Vaccine. 2004;22:594–596.
17. Jenkinson D. Duration of effectiveness of pertussis vaccine: evidence from a 10 year community study. BMJ (Clin Res.). 1988;296:612–614.
18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pertussis outbreaks-Massachusetts and Maryland, 1992. MMWR. 1993;42:197–200.
19. Ramsay ME, Farrington CP, Miller E. Age-specific efficacy of pertussis vaccine during epidemic and non-epidemic periods. Epidemiol Infect. 1993;111:41–48.
20. He Q, Schmidt-Schlapfer G, Just M, et al. Impact of polymerase chain reaction on clinical pertussis research: Finnish and Swiss experiences. J Infect Dis. 1996;174:1288–1295.
21. Biellik RJ, Patriarca PA, Mullen JR, et al. Risk factors for community- and household-acquired pertussis during a large-scale outbreak in central Wisconsin. J Infect Dis. 1988;157:1134–1141.
22. Gustafsson L, Hallander HO, Olin P, Reizenstein E, Storsaeter J. Controlled trial of a two-component acellular, a five-component acellular, and a whole-cell pertussis vaccine. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:349–355.
23. Long SS, Lischner HW, Deforest A, Clark JL. Serologic evidence of subclinical pertussis in immunized children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1990;9:700–705.
24. Simondon F, Preziosi MP, Yam A, et al. Randomized double-blind trial comparing a two-component acellular to a whole-cell pertussis vaccine in Senegal. Vaccine. 1997;15:1606–1612.
25. Tindberg Y, Blennow M, Granstrom M. Ten year follow-up after immunization with a two component acellular pertussis vaccine. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999;18:361–365.
26. Lugauer S, Heininger U, Cherry JD, Stehr K. Long-term clinical effectiveness of an acellular pertussis component vaccine and a whole cell pertussis component vaccine. Eur J Pediatr. 2002;161:142–146.
27. Cherry J, Beer T, Chartrand A, et al. Comparison of values of antibody to Bordetella pertussis antigens in young German and American men. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:1271–1274.
28. de Melker HE, Versteegh FG, Conyn-Van Spaendonck MA, et al. Specificity and sensitivity of high levels of immunoglobulin G antibodies against pertussis toxin in a single serum sample for diagnosis of infection with Bordetella pertussis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:800–806.
29. Storsaeter J, Hallander HO, Gustafsson L, Olin P. Levels of anti-pertussis antibodies related to protection after household exposure to Bordetella pertussis. Vaccine. 1998;16:1907–1916.
30. Teunis PF, van der Heijden OG, de Melker HE, Schellekens JF, Versteegh FG, Kretzschmar ME. Kinetics of the IgG antibody response to pertussis toxin after infection with B. pertussis. Epidemiol Infect. 2002;129:479–489.
31. Taranger J, Trollfors B, Bergfors E, et al. Immunologic and epidemiologic experience of vaccination with a monocomponent pertussis toxoid vaccine. Pediatrics. 2001;108:E115.
32. Trollfors B, Taranger J, Lagergard T, et al. Immunization of children with pertussis toxoid decreases spread of pertussis within the family. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17:196–199.
33. Cooper E, Fitch L. Pertussis: herd immunity and vaccination coverage in St.Lucia. Lancet. 1983;2:1129–1132.
34. Olin P, Gustafsson L, Barreto L, et al. Declining pertussis incidence in Sweden following the introduction of acellular pertussis vaccine. Vaccine. 2003;21:2015–2021.
35. Preziosi MP, Yam A, Wassilak SG, et al. Epidemiology of pertussis in a West African community before and after introduction of a widespread vaccination program. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:891–896.
Bordetella pertussis; pertussis; immunization; immunity
© 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.