Background: Acute septic arthritis of the knee in children may be treated by arthroscopic or open methods however paediatric data comparing these methods is limited regarding both short and long-term outcomes. This study aimed to compare outcomes following arthroscopic versus open surgery for acute paediatric septic knee arthritis.
Methods: Paediatric patients with acute knee septic arthritis treated at our institution from 1996 to 2016 were retrospectively assessed. The clinical presentations, operations, micro-organisms, laboratory results, knee radiological findings and antibiotics administered were compared. Patients long-term outcomes were assessed at mean 6.9 (range 1.1-20.3) years.
Results: Twenty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Eleven patients received arthroscopic irrigation and 13 had open irrigation. Five patients in the open group (38.5%) required a second irrigation compared to none in the arthroscopic group (95% C.I. 12%-65%, p = 0.041). Time to range the knee occurred earlier in the arthroscopic group (5.0 days; arthroscopic vs 10.6 days; open, difference 5.6 days: 95% C.I. 0.84-10.3, p = 0.023) as well as weightbearing (2.7 days; arthroscopic vs 10.3 days; open, difference 7.6 days: 95% C.I. 2.3-12.9, p = 0.008). Eighty-three percent of patients attended followup. No infections recurred. No significant differences were found in KOOS-Child scores, Lysholm scores, ROM, leg length, gait and radiological findings.
Conclusions: For acute paediatric septic knee arthritis arthroscopic irrigation is associated with less repeat surgical irrigations and allows earlier knee ranging and weightbearing compared to open irrigation. At long-term followup no significant difference was found between groups.
Copyright (C) 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.