Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 2011 - Volume 30 - Issue 2 > Vaccine Effectiveness Against Laboratory-confirmed Influenza...
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal:
doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318201811c
Original Studies

Vaccine Effectiveness Against Laboratory-confirmed Influenza in Healthy Young Children: A Case–Control Study

Kelly, Heath MPH*†; Jacoby, Peter MSc‡; Dixon, Gabriela A. MB BS‡; Carcione, Dale PhD§; Williams, Simon BSc¶; Moore, Hannah C. BSc(Hons), GradDipClinEpi‡; Smith, David W. MB BS¶∥**; Keil, Anthony D. MB BS††; Van Buynder, Paul MPH§‡‡; Richmond, Peter C. MB BS‡§§;; the WAIVE Study Team

Supplemental Author Material
Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: The Western Australian Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness study commenced in 2008 to evaluate a new program to provide free influenza vaccine to all children aged 6 to 59 months. We aimed to assess the protective effect of inactivated influenza vaccination in these children.

Methods: We conducted a prospective case–control study in general practices and a hospital emergency department, testing all eligible patients for influenza and a range of other common respiratory viruses. Influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) against laboratory-confirmed influenza was estimated with cases defined as children with an influenza-like illness who tested positive and controls as those with an influenza-like illness who tested negative for influenza virus. We calculated VE using the adjusted odds ratio from multivariate logistic regression. As a surrogate marker for adequate specimen collection, we explored the difference in VE point estimates defining controls as children in whom another respiratory virus was detected.

Results: A total of 75 children were enrolled from general practices and 214 through the emergency department, with 12 (27%) and 36 (17%), respectively, having laboratory-confirmed influenza. Using all the influenza-negative controls, the adjusted VE was 58% (95% confidence interval, 9–81). When controls were limited to those with another virus present, the adjusted VE was 68% (95% confidence interval, 26–86).

Conclusions: VE estimates were higher when controls included only those children with another respiratory virus detected. Testing for other common respiratory viruses enables the control group to be restricted to those for whom an adequate sample is likely.

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.