INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Spasticity is a common impairment found in children with cerebral palsy (CP)1 and may contribute to limitations in motor function.2 It has been recently defined as “disordered sensorimotor control, resulting from an upper motor lesion, presenting as intermittent or sustained involuntary activation of muscles.”3(p5) One method of measuring spasticity involves an isokinetic dynamometer to passively move a limb through a defined range of motion at a defined velocity while the peak resistive torque is measured during the movement.4,5 An advantage to using isokinetic dynamometry to assess spasticity is that both the reflexive and nonreflexive components of spasticity can be quantified objectively by concurrent acquisition of electromyographic (EMG) and torque data.6 Recent studies have revealed increased co-contraction and reflex activity during the assessment of spasticity in children with CP compared with peers with typical development, using such isokinetic dynamometry methods.7,8
Reduced muscle mass is another common impairment found in children with CP. Malaiya and colleagues9 reported less muscle volume of the medial gastrocnemius in children with hemiplegic CP than in children with typical development, using ultrasound imaging techniques. Alternatively, Lampe et al10 found diminished volumes of the muscles of the more affected lower extremity when compared with the less affected lower extremity in a sample of adolescents and young adults with spastic hemiplegia, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement techniques. Johnson et al11 discovered 51% less mid-thigh cross-sectional area (CSA) in individuals with quadriplegic CP than in a control group. Finally, Moreau and colleagues12 recently reported decreased CSA of the rectus femoris and decreased muscle thickness of the rectus femoris and vastus lateralis (VL) when comparing children with spastic CP with children with typical development.
The relationship between muscle volume and spasticity, however, has not been well investigated in children with CP. In a study of children and adolescents with CP, Ohata et al13 found no correlation between muscle thickness of the quadriceps femoris (QF) measured by ultrasonography and spasticity measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Interestingly, Gorgey and Dudley14 reported a significant correlation between the MAS score and muscle CSA in adults with incomplete spinal cord injury and suggested spasticity may assist with maintaining muscle size after an injury. The work of Lofvenmark and colleagues15 supported this hypothesis in individuals with spinal cord injury reporting that those with severe spasticity as measured by the MAS had greater muscle mass in the lower extremities than individuals with no or mild spasticity. Because of the subjective nature of rating spasticity using the MAS, the validity and reliability of the MAS as a quantitative measure of assessing spasticity have been questioned by multiple authors.16–18 The characteristics of the MAS may contribute to the inconsistent findings of the relationship between spasticity and muscle mass to date.
The use of reliable methods of spasticity measurement such as isokinetic dynamometry and concurrent EMG recording could provide more clear insight into the relationships between muscle volume and spasticity. To our knowledge, the relationship between co-contraction and reflex activity measured during the assessment of spasticity and muscle volume has not been previously investigated in children with CP. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between spasticity, reflex activity, co-activation, and muscle volume in children with CP, using isokinetic dynamometry and MRI measurement techniques.
A university-affiliated institutional review board approved this investigation. Written informed consent from each child's parents along with written assent was obtained from each child prior to participation. Children met the following inclusion criteria: (1) a diagnosis of spastic diplegic CP; (2) between 7 and 14 years of age; (3) no documentation in the medical record of hip subluxation, hip dislocation, or significant scoliosis (curvature >40°); (4) ability to follow 1-step commands and to attend to tasks associated with data collection; (5) 1 or more years postsurgery of the lower extremities; (6) 6 months or more post–botulinum toxin injection; (7) 10° or less of knee flexion contracture; and (8) absence of magnetically active or cardiac implants. A retrospective sample of 8 children with CP (mean age = 10.4 years, SD = 1.8, range 8.0–13.6; Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS] level II = 2, GMFCS level III = 6) who had participated in separate protocols involving spasticity testing and thigh MRI was analyzed. Spasticity and MRI protocols were completed within a period of 1 week.
The procedures to measure spasticity used in this investigation have been described elsewhere8 and are summarized here. The right limb was tested, and 2 surface EMG electrodes were placed over the VL and the medial hamstring (MH). Electrical activity of the muscles was recorded using Delsys signal conditioning electrodes (Delsys Inc, Boston, Massachusetts) with a parallel bar arrangement (contact area 1 × 10 mm, 10-mm interelectrode distance), a gain of 1000 V/V, a common mode rejection ratio of greater than 80 dB at 60 Hz, a noise level of 1.5-μV RMS, and a band-pass filter of 20 to 450 Hz. A Bagnoli 4-channel EMG system (Chattex Corporporation, Chattanooga, Tennessee) with a band-pass filter between 20 and 450 Hz and a gain of 1000 V/V provided additional processing of the EMG signal. The sample rate of EMG signals was 1.2 kHz.
Subjects were seated on the isokinetic dynamometer (National Instruments Corporation, Austin, Texas) in a position of 80° of hip flexion, 90° of knee flexion, and with the ankle unrestricted. The axis of the knee joint was visually aligned with the axis of the dynamometer. Baseline resting EMG data were collected while the subjects were not moving. One set of 3 continuous passive movements at a velocity of 5°/s was collected for gravity correction of the limb's weight. Data were collected using a personal computer and custom software written in Labview 5.1 (The MathWorks Inc, Natick, Massachusetts) for offline data analysis. One set of 10 continuous passive movements from 25° of knee flexion to 90° of knee flexion was completed at a velocity of 180°/s, with a return speed of 5°/s to assess knee extensor spasticity. A custom Matlab program (The MathWorks Inc) was used for postprocessing and analysis of data. The gravity corrected knee extensor peak resistive torque was calculated during the constant velocity portion of each movement. The peak torque was identified as the maximum passive resistive torque of the 10 movement repetitions.
EMG data were full-wave rectified and processed using a second-order Butterworth 10-Hz low-pass filter with phase correction to create a linear envelope. Electromyographic onset and offset were defined as muscle activity that was 3 SDs above baseline and occurred for a minimum of 50 milliseconds.19 The percentage of the range of movement with EMG classified as reflexive or co-activation was quantified for the repetition exhibiting peak torque. Electromyographic activity of either the MH or VL during passive movement was defined as reflexive muscle activity. Simultaneous EMG activity of both the MH and VL during passive movement was defined as co-activation.
The MRI protocol used in this investigation has been described elsewhere20 and is summarized here. Within 2 days of spasticity testing, a clinical 1.5-T magnet MRI (GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, Wisconsin) was used to measure the maximum muscle anatomic CSA and muscle volume of the QF. A standard thoracic coil was used to collect images of the right leg while the child was in the supine position. Sequential scans were used to acquire 3-dimensional data from the QF from proximal to distal, using a standard spoiled gradient-echo sequence. Coronal T1-weighted spin-echo localizing scans and transverse 3-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo images were acquired with an encoding matrix of 256 × 256 × 28. The slice thickness was 7 mm, and chemically selective fat suppression was used to enhance visual definition between muscle groups for all scans.
The fat-free CSA of each imaged muscle for each slice was calculated using an interactive computer program and a correction algorithm.21 Individual segments of each head of each muscle were analyzed and then summed to determine the CSA of each slice. The slice with the highest summed CSA of the component muscle heads was defined as the maximum CSA. Volume was calculated by multiplying by the number of slices and the slice thickness by the total CSA of the muscle.
Data analysis was completed using SPSS version 14.0. Data were analyzed for normality and found to be nonnormally distributed. Spearmen correlation coefficients were completed to determine the relationship between measurements of knee extensor muscle mass (maximum CSA, muscle volume, CSA normalized to patient weight, and muscle volume normalized to patient weight) and knee extensor spasticity (peak passive torque, reflex activity of the MH and VL, and co-contraction). The level for statistical significance was set at α < .05.
The correlation matrix examining relationships between measures of QF muscle mass and knee extensor spasticity are presented in the Table 1. Significant positive correlations were found between muscle volume and the percentage of the passive range of motion with MH activation, VL activation, and co-contraction, (P < .05). Also, peak knee extensor passive torque was positively correlated to muscle volume (P < .05).
Significant positive correlations were found between maximal CSA and the percentage of the passive range of motion with MH activation, VL activation, and co-contraction (P < .05). There was also a significant positive correlation between muscle volume normalized to weight and VL activation (P < .05).
Our results suggest that quadriceps muscle volume is greater in children with diplegic CP who have higher levels of spasticity as measured by both passive torque and EMG measures of spasticity. While Lieber et al22 summarized the literature regarding structural changes in spastic muscle and noted that changes in muscle fiber size, fiber type distribution, stiffness, and extracellular matrix contributed to spasticity, this study is the first to report a relationship between muscle mass and spasticity.
Our results conflict with the report of Ohata et al,13 who found no relationship between spasticity and muscle thickness. However, differences in the methodology used to assess spasticity (MAS vs isokinetic dynamometry) and muscle size (ultrasonography vs MRI) could account for these conflicting results. Specifically, the use of isokinetic dynamometry to measure spasticity differs from the MAS in a number of ways. First of all, the MAS employs an ordinal scale that may be less sensitive than isokinetic dynamometry that measures spasticity on a ratio scale. Also, the position of the child being assessed is more standardized with isokinetic dynamometry through the use of seat belts and other equipment. Finally, the speed of passive limb movement is standardized using an isokinetic dynamometer whereas the speed of passive movement using the MAS is dependent on the assessor. An additional methodological issue that may have affected our results is the use of the percentage of the range of motion with EMG activity as our measurement of EMG response. The use of a 3-SD response from baseline as the measurement was decided to maximize the reliability of the determination of EMG onset,19 but the magnitude of the EMG above 3 SDs was not calculated, which may have provide additional information regarding the reflexivity of the muscle. Further research investigating different methodologies for the assessment of spasticity is warranted.
The direction of a possible causal relationship between muscle spasticity and muscle volume is unknown because of the correlational design of this study. Although our previous research suggests that passive muscle stiffness contributes more to spasticity in children with CP than increased reflex activity,8 we hypothesize that the muscles of children who have increased reflex muscle activity associated with their spasticity may have increased muscle volume due to the reflexive muscle contractions decreasing the effect of disuse atrophy. Our finding of a relationship between MH activity and QF muscle mass is likely due to MH activity occurring in conjunction with VL activity as co-contraction.7 A startle response to the movement of the limb by the dynamometer may have also caused this co-contraction,7 but we are unable to differentiate a startle response from co-contraction due to the retrospective nature of this study. It is unknown whether the increase in muscle size positively affects function and muscle strength, especially since the investigations of the relationships between spasticity, strength, and function have reported conflicting results in children with CP.2,23,24
An alternative hypothesis for our results is that children with increased muscle size show increased spasticity because their larger muscles would be stiffer during passive movements. Fewer significant relationships were detected using normalized measures of muscle mass, which suggests that relative muscle size may be less of a factor with spasticity whereas growth and aging may contribute to greater spasticity. Although our previous work has shown a positive relationship between age and knee flexor spasticity, no relationship was found between age and knee extensor spasticity.25 Further research is needed to determine the contribution of aging to the relationship between spasticity and muscle mass.
The clinical significance of our finding of a positive relationship between spasticity and muscle volume in children with CP is unknown. There is an emerging literature that has investigated the possible beneficial effect of spasticity in people with spinal cord injury. Gorgey and colleagues26 recently reported that muscle spasticity in people with chronic complete spinal cord injury was associated with improved body fat composition as measured by fat-free mass and indirectly improved metabolic profiles with regard to lipid profile and glucose homeostasis. Also, Bennegard and Karlsson27 found that spastic lower extremities demonstrated increased glucose uptake compared with control subjects and concluded that spasticity may be protective with regard to diabetes. An important consideration for children with CP is that they may be at risk for diabetes due to increased adipose tissue infiltration of skeletal muscle11 and greater inactivity28 than children with typical development. Additional research is clearly needed to investigate the possible positive effects of spasticity on metabolism and body composition in children with CP.
The results of this study should be interpreted cautiously because of the small sample size used in the investigation. It is unknown whether the results of this study would generalize to other muscle groups and age ranges in children with spastic CP. One limitation of this study is that our data analysis was limited to the QF and did not examine the knee flexor muscle group. Also, children with different levels of functional mobility may or may not show a similar relationship between spasticity and muscle size. Additional research is needed to determine whether our finding of a relationship between spasticity and muscle volume is generalizable to children with different age ranges, levels of functional mobility, and muscle groups.
Our results suggest that higher levels of knee extensor muscle spasticity are associated with greater quadriceps muscle volume in children with spastic diplegic CP. The clinical significance of this finding is unknown, and additional research is required to investigate the possible positive effects of spasticity on metabolism and body composition in children with CP.
1. Lin JP. The cerebral palsies: a physiological approach. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(suppl 1):i23–i29.
2. Damiano DL, Quinlivan J, Owen BF, Shaffrey M, Abel MF. Spasticity versus strength in cerebral palsy: relationships among involuntary resistance, voluntary torque, and motor function. Eur J Neurol. 2001;8(suppl 5):40–49.
3. Pandyan AD, Gregoric M, Barnes MP, et al. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(1–2):2–6.
4. Boiteau M, Malouin F, Richards CL. Use of a hand-held dynamometer and a Kin-Com dynamometer for evaluating spastic hypertonia in children: a reliability study. Phys Ther. 1995;75(9):796–802.
5. Pierce SR, Lauer RT, Shewokis PA, Rubertone JA, Orlin MN. Test-retest reliability of isokinetic dynamometry for the assessment of spasticity of the knee flexors and knee extensors in children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(5):697–702.
6. Biering-Sorensen F, Nielsen JB, Klinge K. Spasticity-assessment: a review. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(12):708–722.
7. Pierce SR, Barbe MF, Barr AE, Shewokis PA, Lauer RT. Co-contraction during passive movements of the knee joint in children with cerebral palsy. Clin Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon). 2008;22(9):1045–1048.
8. Pierce SR, Barbe MF, Barr AE, Shewokis PA, Lauer RT. Roles of reflex activity and co-contraction during assessments of spasticity of the knee flexor and knee extensor muscles in children with cerebral palsy and different functional levels. Phys Ther. 2008;88(10):1124–1134.
9. Malaiya R, McNee AE, Fry NR, Eve LC, Gough M, Shortland AP. The morphology of the medial gastrocnemius in typically developing children and children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2007;17(6):657–663.
10. Lampe R, Grassl S, Mitternacht J, Gerdesmeyer L, Gradinger R. MRT-measurements of muscle volumes of the lower extremities of youths with spastic hemiplegia caused by cerebral palsy. Brain Dev. 2006;28(8):500–506.
11. Johnson DL, Miller F, Subramanian P, Modlesky CM. Adipose tissue infiltration of skeletal muscle in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr. 2009;154(5):715–720.
12. Moreau NG, Teefey SA, Damiano DL. In vivo muscle architecture and size of the rectus femoris and vastus lateralis in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51(10):800–806.
13. Ohata K, Tsuboyama T, Haruta T, Ichihashi N, Kato T, Nakamura T. Relation between muscle thickness, spasticity, and activity limitations in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(2):152–156.
14. Gorgey AS, Dudley GA. Spasticity may defend skeletal muscle size and composition after incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(2):96–102.
15. Lofvenmark I, Werhagen L, Norrbrink C. Spasticity and bone density after a spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(13):1080–1084.
16. Blackburn M, van Vliet P, Mockett SP. Reliability of measurements obtained with the modified Ashworth scale in the lower extremities of people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2002;82(1):25–34.
17. Fosang AL, Galea MP, McCoy AT, Reddihough DS, Story I. Measures of muscle and joint performance in the lower limb of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45(10):664–670.
18. Pandyan AD, Johnson GR, Price CI, Curless RH, Barnes MP, Rodgers H. A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13(5):373–383.
19. Hodges PW, Bui BH. A comparison of computer-based methods for the determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;101(6):511–519.
20. Stackhouse SK, Binder-Macleod SA, Stackhouse CA, McCarthy JJ, Prosser LA, Lee SC. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation versus volitional isometric strength training in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy: A preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(6):475–485.
21. Elliott MA, Walter GA, Gulish H, et al. Volumetric measurement of human calf muscle from magnetic resonance imaging. MAGMA. 1997;5(2):93–98.
22. Lieber RL, Steinman S, Barash IA, Chambers H. Structural and functional changes in spastic skeletal muscle. Muscle Nerve. 2004;29(5):615–627.
23. Ross SA, Engsberg JR. Relationships between spasticity, strength, gait, and the GMFM-66 in persons with spastic diplegia cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(9):1114–1120.
24. Kim WH, Park EY. Causal relation between spasticity, strength, gross motor function, and functional outcome in children with cerebral palsy: a path analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(1):68–73.
25. Pierce SR, Prosser LA, Lauer RT. Relationship between age and spasticity in children with diplegic cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(3):448–451.
26. Gorgey AS, Chiodo AE, Zemper ED, Hornyak JE, Rodriguez GM, Gater DR. Relationship of spasticity to soft tissue body composition and the metabolic profile in persons with chronic motor complete spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2010;33(1):6–15.
27. Bennegard GM, Karlsson AK. Higher glucose uptake in paralysed spastic leg. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(2):103–106.
28. Zwier JN, van Schie PE, Becher JG, Smits DW, Gorter JW, Dallmeijer AJ. Physical activity in young children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(18):1501–1508.
child; cerebral palsy/physiopathology; electromyography; magnetic resonance imaging/methods; motor activity; muscle/anatomy/histology; muscle contraction; muscle spasticity muscle weakness/physiopathology; quadriceps muscle/physiopathology; retrospective study