Skip Navigation LinksHome > Spring 2010 - Volume 22 - Issue 1 > Pain in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Implications for Pedia...
Pediatric Physical Therapy:
doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181cd18a7
Review Article

Pain in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Implications for Pediatric Physical Therapy

Swiggum, Mary PT, PCS; Hamilton, Merry Lynne PT, PhD; Gleeson, Peggy PT, PhD; Roddey, Toni PT, PhD

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

School of Physical Therapy, Texas Woman's University, Houston, Texas

Address Correspondence to: Mary Swiggum, PT, PCS, Texas Woman's University, School of Physical Therapy, 6700 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail: mswiggum@twu.edu

This work was completed in partial fulfillment of a Doctor in Philosophy Degree in Physical Therapy for the first author.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose: This literature review explores pain assessment tools and psychosocial pain management methods that are pertinent to physical therapy (PT) for children with cerebral palsy (CP).

Summary of Key Points: Children with CP experience considerable pain that affects quality of life and cooperation during healthcare procedures. Physical therapist–led research on interventions to address pain in this population is limited, despite evidence for the prevalence of pain during PT interventions, and the preponderance of research supporting the use of psychosocial pain management during other healthcare-related pain-inducing procedures.

Statement of Conclusions and Recommendations for Physical Therapy Practice: Research completed primarily by non–physical therapist healthcare professionals delineate assessment tools and psychosocial pain management techniques that hold promise for evaluating and reducing pain that occurs during PT procedures for children with CP.

Back to Top | Article Outline

INTRODUCTION

Pain is a frequent if not daily experience for many children with cerebral palsy (CP).1–4 Families of children with CP identify bodily pain and pain associated with physical therapy (PT) as deterrents to high quality of life.5 Despite the growing awareness of pain in children with CP and its adverse effects, there is a paucity of physical therapist–led research investigating pain in this population. Most research has been completed by other healthcare professionals, and few recommendations have been incorporated into PT practice. This article addresses this by reviewing the available pain assessment tools for children with CP and the application of psychosocial pain management techniques to pediatric PT interventions.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DEFINITION OF PAIN

The International Association for the Study of Pain defines pain as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual and potential tissue damage.”6 The Guide to Physical Therapy Practice defines pain as “a disturbed sensation that causes suffering or distress.”7 Apparent in both definitions, pain is a subjective experience. Prolonged or repeated exposure to pain can alter responses to future painful stimuli (hyperalgesia) and even to usually nonpainful stimuli (allodynia).8–11 Additional factors that may influence the experience of a painful event include chronological age, gender, cognitive and emotional development, coping skills, culture, and conditions surrounding the event. Consequently, a child's response to stressful and painful events is not stable and may be modified by knowledgeable adults.

Back to Top | Article Outline

ETIOLOGY OF PAIN IN CHILDREN WITH CP

There are many potential contributors to pain in children with CP. McKearnan et al12 classified these causative agents into the following categories: surgical, procedural, gastrointestinal, orthopedic, neuromuscular, and rehabilitative. Depending on how pain is defined, psychological mechanisms may also contribute to the pain experience. This review does not focus on the surgical and procedural causes of pain because these have received considerable attention and are not specific to children with CP. Classifications by McKearnan et al of gastrointestinal, orthopedic, neuromuscular, and rehabilitative causes of pain are reviewed along with the role of psychological mechanisms.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Gastrointestinal Etiologies

Common gastrointestinal problems associated with pain in children with CP include dysphagia, esophagitis, gastritis, gastroesophageal reflux, gastrointestinal tube feeding, constipation, and enteric ulcers.13 Del Giudice et al14 reported the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux in CP as 32% in a sample of 58 children, but 92% of those studied had clinically significant gastrointestinal pain. Gastrointestinal dysfunction may result in behavioral problems at mealtimes; distress upon lying down after a meal or at night; excessive hand mouthing; excessive drooling; and head and trunk posturing into extreme flexion or extension.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Orthopedic Etiologies

Numerous orthopedic deformities and biomechanical abnormalities associated with CP can be a source of chronic pain.15,16 It is suggested that sustained muscle contraction around joints and poor postural alignment can lead to the early onset of degenerative arthritis.17,18 Orthopedic deformities that have been correlated with pain include hip subluxation and dislocation, patella alta, equinus, valgus deformities of the knee and ankle, radial dislocation or subluxation, cartilage degeneration, scoliosis, pelvic obliquity, kyphosis, lordosis, and contractures.16,19,20

Back to Top | Article Outline
Neuromuscular Etiologies

Although the mechanism of spasticity-related pain is not well understood, spasticity plays an important role in at least some chronic pain. In addition to the muscle and joint problems that arise from spasticity, spasticity may affect essentially every system in the body (ie, gastrointestinal, respiratory, and circulatory). In addition to spasticity, other etiologies include nerve entrapments, radiculopathies, and myelopathies.21

Back to Top | Article Outline
Rehabilitative Etiologies

Kibele22 reported that one of the most salient negative memories of childhood in adults with CP was the pain related to PT interventions of stretching and bracing. A survey by Hadden et al23 of parents revealed that the activity most frequently identified as painful and greatest in pain intensity for children with CP was assisted stretching. Other reported painful activities included independent standing, assisted walking, assisted sitting, and donning splints. Since then, Hadden et al have identified PT intervention as a convenient setting to further study pain in children with CP. Using the Non-communicating Children's Checklist, Postoperative Version to evaluate pain responses, they demonstrated a significant increase in pain behaviors during stretching activities.24

Others confirm the findings of Hadden et al. McKearnan25 surveyed 95 youth with developmental disabilities aged 8 to 20 years. Fifty-eight percent reported pain during physical or occupational therapy. Fifty-three percent reported pain during a therapeutic home program. Stretching was the most frequently mentioned painful activity.

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODOLOGY

The following electronic databases were searched from January 1998 to June 2008: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, ERIC, Proquest Nursing and Allied Health Source, and WORLDCAT Dissertations. Search terms included combinations of pain, children, CP, PT, psychosocial pain management, nonpharmaceutical pain management, pain assessment, and pain tools. Additional hand searches were performed as indicated. Articles that were directly related to PT intervention for children with CP were included. Articles related to pediatric pain assessment and management and pediatric PT were included if application to children with CP was discerned by the primary author.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Pain Assessment

Several categories of pain assessment tools exist, including self-report, physiological pain, behavioral pain, and distress measures.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Self-Report Measures.

Self-report measures can be verbal, such as structured interviews, questionnaires, self-rating scales, and pain adjective descriptors, or nonverbal behaviors, such as facial expression scales and drawings. Aspects of pain that may be assessed through self-report include location, intensity, duration and quality, affective reactions, situational factors that increase pain, and pain-related disability. Numerous scales exist. An article by O'Rourke26 provides a chart outlining uses for the individual tools and their psychometric properties.

Self-report has been identified as the gold standard in pain assessment. However, von Baeyer27 identified limitations of self-report measures in children. These include (1) the requirement of sufficient cognitive and language development; (2) lack of understanding may lead children to construct an answer; (3) children younger than 5 years tend to treat scales as dichotomous rather than graded and choose only the extremes; and (4) children's reports of pain may be affected by their perception of the consequences of the rating.

Accurate pain assessment requires careful consideration of the child, the nature of the pain, and the availability and appropriateness of various pain scales (Table 1). The administration of a pain scale requires careful planning as well (Table 2). Adhering to the recommendations in Table 2 may help ensure valid results. However, the use of self-report measures in children with CP during PT procedures is further limited by insufficient evidence regarding the reliability and validity of their use in this population.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Behavioral Measures.

Commonly used assessment tools that rely on behavioral measures include the Child Facial Coding System28; the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale29; and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale.30,31 Behaviors associated with pain in children are listed in Table 3.

Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools

Recently, researchers have been developing tools in consultation with caregivers specifically for use in children with CP, such as the Non-communicating Children's Pain Checklist, Postoperative Version,32,33 the Individualized Numerical Rating Scale (INRS),34 and the Pediatric Pain Profile (PPP).35 The INRS and the PPP are envisioned as parent-administered scales (Table 4).

Table 4
Table 4
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Physiological Measures.

Physiological measures, such as heart rate, vagal tone, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, palmar sweating, and neuroendocrine response, may be used to rate pain responses. Challenges associated with interpreting these measures in isolation include the following: (1) physiological responses to various types of stress are similar; (2) physiological responses to long-term pain seem to habituate; (3) gestational age, medications, overall health, and environmental factors may influence response (Table 5). Additionally, according to Breau et al36 the majority of researchers suggest that physiological responses to pain in children with neurological impairment may differ from those expressed by typically developing children.

Table 5
Table 5
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

PSYCHOSOCIAL PAIN MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES

Psychosocial pain management techniques may be divided into cognitive-behavioral methods and social environmental interventions. Techniques vary depending on the age and developmental functioning of the child due to cognitive, emotional, and communicative differences. The Appendix describes some of the most frequently studied pediatric psychosocial pain management techniques. Most of the research on psychosocial pain reduction techniques for children has been related to acute or procedural pain, such as needle injections, suctioning, dental procedures, and postoperative care. Some research, however, has considered chronic conditions such as headaches and abdominal pain (Table 6). This search of the literature revealed only 2 studies focused on children with CP.

Table 6
Table 6
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Psychosocial Interventions
Cognitive-Behavioral Methods.

Cognitive-behavioral methods promote the development and application of coping skills and knowledge of the relationships of thoughts and behaviors to pain experiences. Strong evidence supporting the use of these interventions to address chronic headache, abdominal pain, and needle-related procedural pain in typically developing children was found in an analysis of 3 Cochrane reviews.37–39 Attention-shifting measures, such as distraction, have received considerable attention and support as techniques to decrease both behavioral and self-reported measures of pain and distress in children.42–44 The literature supports the effectiveness of distraction in reducing pain, provided the age and interests of the child are considered in addition to the characteristics of the healthcare environment. Memory alteration is another cognitive-behavioral strategy to consider with young children. Emerging research suggests that memories of procedures can be edited making subsequent procedures less painful.45 Children may introduce false information into a retrospective account of an event. A knowledgeable adult can alter the way in which a child experiences and/or remembers pain by shaping the event as it occurs or afterward. Essentially, a child's memory of the painful event can be “reframed” by the adult.

No studies that explored the use of these strategies to decrease pain and promote coping in children with CP during PT interventions were found.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Social Environmental Interventions.

The search revealed 1 study that explored the role of the social environment on the responses of children with CP to potentially painful stretching. Miller et al40,41 investigated the influence of physical therapists' behavior and the passage of time on the level of distress and coping in children with CP undergoing rehabilitation after selective dorsal rhizotomies. The rehabilitation included sessions of stretching. The Child Adult Medical Procedure Interaction Scale was used to code the behavioral interactions. A positive relationship was observed between therapist coping-promoting behavior and coping behavior in the children (r = 0.72). Commands to use coping and nonprocedural talk were helpful. Similarly, there was a positive relationship between distress-promoting physical therapist behavior and distress in the children (r = 0.61). Criticism and reassurance were associated with increased levels of distress. Overall, the children's distress during therapy sessions decreased over time.

Back to Top | Article Outline

SUMMARY

Children with CP are at increased risk for pain compared with the general population due to the frequency of occurrence of gastric, neuromuscular, and orthopedic problems as well as surgical and procedural interventions. These risk factors may compound the pain that is experienced during PT-recommended procedures. Although numerous pain tools have been developed for use in hospital environments to assess children's pain and distress responses to acute and procedural interventions, few have been developed to assess responses to less invasive procedures such PT interventions. The use of these assessment tools and their validity and reliability during real-time PT interventions have not been explored. Psychosocial pain management techniques are effective in reducing pain and distress in children during procedural interventions. These techniques have the potential to decrease stress for the caregivers as well. There is emerging evidence that these techniques may assist children with CP in coping with pain and distress during postsurgical PT interventions. A gap appears to exist between the assessment and management of pain in children developing typically and those with CP. Physical therapists can assist in closing this gap by addressing issues related to practice and research.

Back to Top | Article Outline

IMPLICATIONS FOR PT PRACTICE, EDUCATION, AND RESEARCH

Practice

Pediatric physical therapists should examine their current knowledge and practice patterns regarding behavioral indicators of pain in children with CP. Interventions that are contributing to distress and pain must be openly acknowledged, and the evidence for their use be analyzed. Evaluative and discriminative pain and distress assessment tools should be incorporated into PT practice, although tool reliability and validity needs to be addressed for this population. Parent-administered pain assessment tools, such as the INRS and the PPP, should be encouraged. The literature supports the use of psychosocial intervention, specifically, age-appropriate distraction and coping strategies, to prevent and reduce the experience of pain in children. These techniques should be incorporated into PT treatment interventions and home programs. Physical therapist responses that may contribute to distress and maladaptive pain coping skills should be avoided, including the use of reassurance, apologies, criticism, and encouraging pain-contingent rest. Lifelong management of pain needs to be considered early as a child's experiences with the healthcare environment can affect later health behaviors. Families should be educated in relevant models of disease and pain management. Families and children should be encouraged to adopt regular exercise routines and exposure to movement despite pain.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Research

Research on the etiology, assessment, and management of pain in children with CP is limited. Most of the research on pain assessment and management in children has been performed during one-time procedural interventions, such as needle injection. Little is known about pain responses to PT interventions or how those responses may be evaluated and modified by psychosocial or physical interventions. Areas for research include (1) comparison of caregivers' and children's perceptions of pain with physical therapists' perceptions of pain for children with CP; (2) identification of physical therapists' characteristics, experiences, or beliefs that influence awareness of and responses to pain in children with CP; (3) investigation of assessment tools and interventions used by physical therapists to assess and manage pain in children with CP; and (4) investigation of the psychometric properties of pain assessment tools used for children with CP during PT procedures.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSION

Pediatric therapists are in frequent and intimate contact with young children with CP and their families and are in a unique position to assess and manage pain in this population. Therapists must acknowledge the pain that children experience and its effect on cooperation and motivation during therapy sessions and home programs, and understand the effect of pain on family functioning, future pain responses, and the child's quality of life. Research on interventions to reduce pain in this population, including physical and psychosocial supports, is needed as is the development of protocols to guide therapists during potentially painful procedures so that evidenced-based, cost-effective, and compassionate PT can be provided.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Tervo RC, Symons F, Stout J, et al. Parental report of pain and associated limitations in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:928–934.

2. Schwartz L, Engel JM, Jensen MP. Pain in persons with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1243–1246.

3. Houlihan C, O'Donnell M, Conaway M, et al. Bodily pain and health-related quality of life in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46:305–310.

4. Castle K, Imms C, Howie L. Being in pain: a phenomenological study of young people with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:445–450.

5. Waters E, Maher E, Salmon L. et al. Development of a condition-specific measure of quality of life for children with cerebral palsy: empirical thematic data reported by parents and children. Child: Care, Health, Dev. 2005;31:127–135.

6. Merskey HB, Bogduk N, eds. The International Association for the Study of Pain (Task Force on Taxonomy). Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definition of Pain Terms. 2nd ed. Seattle Washington: IASP Press; 1994.

7. Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. 2nd ed. Phys Ther. 2001;81:9–744.

8. McGrath P, Gillepsie J. Pain assessment in children and adolescents. In: Turk DC, Melzack Z, eds. Handbook of Pain Assessment. 2nd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2001:97–118.

9. Pert ER. Cutaneous polymodal receptors: characteristics and plasticity. Prog Brain Res. 1996;113:21–37.

10. Neumann S, Doubell TP, Leslie T, et al. Inflammatory pain hypersensitivity mediated by phenotypic switch in myelinated primary sensory neurons. Nature. 1996;384:360–364.

11. Terman GW, Bonica JJ. Spinal mechanisms and their modulation. In: Fishman SM, Ballantyne JC, Rathmell JP, eds. Bonica's Management of Pain. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001:73–152.

12. McKearnan KA, Kiechkhefer GM, Engel JM, et al. Pain in children with cerebral palsy: a review. J Neurosci Nurs. 2004;36:252–259.

13. Samson-Fang L, Butler C, O'Monnel M. Effects of gastrostomy feeding in children with cerebral palsy: an AACPDM evidence report. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45:415–426.

14. Del Giudice E, Staiano A, Capano G, et al. Gastrointestinal manifestations in children in cerebral palsy. Brain Dev. 1999;21:307–311.

15. Jensen MP, Hoffman AJ, Schwartz L. Natural history of chronic pain and pain treatment in adults with cerebral palsy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83:439–445.

16. Gajdosik CG, Cicirello N. Secondary conditions of the musculoskeletal system in adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2001;21:49–68.

17. Murphy KP, Molnar GE, Lankasky K. Medical and functional status of adults with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1995;37:1075–1084.

18. Ehde D, Jensen M, Engel J, et al. Chronic pain secondary to disability: a review. Clin Pain. 2003;19:3–17.

19. Hodgkinson I, Jindrich ML, Duhaut P, et al. Hip pain in 234 non-ambulatory adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional multicentre study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43:806–808.

20. Jahnsen R. Musculoskeletal pain in adults with cerebral palsy compared with the general population. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36:78–84.

21. Roscigno CI. Addressing spasticity related pain in children with spastic cerebral palsy. J Neurosci Nurs. 2003;34:123–133.

22. Kibele A. Occupational therapy's role in improving the quality of life for persons with cerebral palsy. Am J Occup Ther. 1989;43:371–377.

23. Hadden KL, von Baeyer CL. Pain in children with cerebral palsy: common triggers and expressive behaviors. Pain. 2002;99:281–288.

24. Hadden KL, von Baeyer CL. Global and specific behavioral measures of pain in children with cerebral palsy. Clin J Pain. 2005;21:140–146.

25. McKearnan KA. Chronic Pain in Youths with Physical Disabilities. Seattle, WA: University of Washington; 2004. Dissertation.

26. O'Rourke D. The measurement of pain in infants, children, and adolescents: from policy to practice. Phys Ther. 2004;84:560–570.

27. von Baeyer CL. Children's self-reports of pain intensity: scale selection, limitations, and interpretation. Pain Res Manage. 2006;11:157–162.

28. Gilbert CA, Lilley CM, Craig KD, et al. Postoperative pain expression in preschool children: validation of the child facial coding system. Clin J Pain. 1999;15:192–200.

29. Tyler DC, Tu A, Douthit J, et al. Toward validation of pain measurement tools for children: a pilot study. Pain. 1993;52:301–309.

30. Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, et al. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997;23:293–297.

31. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Burke C, et al. The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment. Pediatric Anesth. 2006;16:258–265.

32. Breau LM, McGrath PJ, Camfield C, et al. Preliminary validation of an observational pain checklist for persons with cognitive impairments and inability to communicate verbally. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42:609–616.

33. Breau LM, Finley GA, McGrath PL, et al. Validation of the non-communicating children's pain checklist-postoperative version. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:528–535.

34. Solodiuk J, Curley MA. Pain assessment in nonverbal children with severe cognitive impairments: the Individualized Numeric Rating Scale (INRS). J Pediatr Nurs. 2003;18:295–299.

35. Hunt A, Goldman A, Seers K, et al. Clinical validation of the paediatric pain profile. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46:9–18.

36. Breau LM, McGrath PJ, Zabalia M. Assessing pediatric pain and developmental disabilities. In: Oberlander TF, Symons FJ, eds. Pain in Children & Adults with Developmental Disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing; 2006:149–172.

37. Eccleston C, Yorke L, Morley S, et al. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):CD003968.

38. Huertas-Ceballos A, Logan S, Bennett C, et al. Psychosocial interventions for recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) and irritable bower syndrome (IBS) in childhood. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):CD003968.

39. Uman LS, Chambers CT, McGrath PJ, et al. Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(3):CD005179.

40. Miller AC, Johann-Murphy M, Zhelezniak V. Impact of the therapist-child dyad on children's pain and coping during medical procedures. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43:118–123.

41. Miller AC, Johann-Murphy M, Pit-ten Cate IM. Pain, Anxiety, and cooperativeness in children with cerebral palsy after rhizotomy: changes throughout rehabilitation. J Pediatr Psychol. 1997;22:89–705.

42. Cohen LL, MacLaren JE, Fortson BL, et al. Randomized clinical trial of distraction for infant immunization. Pain. 2006;125:165–171.

43. Kleiber C, Craft-Rosenberg M, Harper DC. Parents as distraction coaches during IV insertion: a randomized study. J Pain Symp Manage. 2001;22:851–861.

44. Megel ME, Houser CW, Gleaves LS. Children's responses to immunizations: lullabies as a distraction. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 1998;21:129–145.

45. von Baeyer CL, Marche TA, Rocha EM, et al. Children's memory for pain: overview and implications for practice. J Pain. 2004;5:241–249.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Cited Here...
Keywords:

children; cerebral palsy; pain; pain measurement; physical therapy; psychosocial factors

APPENDIX Description...
APPENDIX Description...
Image Tools

© 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Article Tools

Images

Share

Follow PED-PT on Twitter

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.