Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Insurance Status Does Not Predict Curve Magnitude in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis at First Presentation to an Orthopaedic Surgeon

Goldstein, Rachel Y. MD, MPH; Joiner, Elizabeth R.A. BS; Skaggs, David L. MD, MMM

Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics: January 2015 - Volume 35 - Issue 1 - p 39–42
doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000184
Spine

Background: Previous studies have identified that children with public insurance have limited access to orthopaedic care. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between insurance status and curve magnitude at the time of presentation to an orthopaedic surgeon and time to treatment at a tertiary pediatric medical center.

Methods: This study was retrospective review of all patients with idiopathic scoliosis over 10 years, who have not had previous spine surgery. Data were collected on demographics, insurance type, curve magnitude at presentation, source of referral, treatment initiated, and time from recommendation for surgery to surgical intervention.

Results: Of the 642 patients included in this study, 53% were publicly insured and 45% were privately insured. Privately insured patients were significantly more likely to be seen as a second opinion (30% vs. 10%, P<0.001), and were significantly more likely to have received previous treatment (8% vs. 4%, P=0.011). Publicly insured patients were significantly more likely to be referred by their primary care doctor (64% vs. 50%, P=0.001) or as a part of school screening program (20% vs. 13%, P=0.036). At the time of presentation, there was no significant difference detected in major Cobb angles in the privately insured group [(private=28.7 (±15.4) degrees vs. public=26.4 (±16.8) degrees, P=0.076)]. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the number of patients who were recommended for operative treatment (public=11% vs. private 16%, P=0.072). However, in a multivariate regression analysis, publicly insured patients waited an average of 2.6 months longer for surgery than privately insured patients (P=0.010).

Conclusions: Patients with private insurance presenting for evaluation of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis were significantly more likely to present as a second opinion than those with government insurance. In this group of 642 patients, no significant differences were found in major Cobb angle at presentation or eventual need for surgery.

Level of Evidence: Level III.

Children’s Orthopaedic Center, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Reprints: David L. Skaggs, MD, MMM, Children’s Orthopaedic Center, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd, Mailstop #69, Los Angeles, CA 90027. E-mail: dskaggs@chla.usc.edu.

Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.