Pediatric Emergency Care

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2008 - Volume 24 - Issue 6 > Pediatric Emergency Care in Europe: A Descriptive Survey of...
Pediatric Emergency Care:
June 2008 - Volume 24 - Issue 6 - pp 359-363
doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318177a762
Original Articles

Pediatric Emergency Care in Europe: A Descriptive Survey of 53 Tertiary Medical Centers

Mintegi, Santiago MD; Shavit, Itai MD; Benito, Javier MD; the REPEM group (Research in European Paediatric Emergency Medicine)

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: To examine determinants of quality of care provided by pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) in tertiary European centers.

Methods: Analysis of questionnaires was sent to directors of PEDs. Questionnaires were sent through the pediatric research group of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. Three major descriptive categories were included in a 28-point questionnaire: institution's pediatric inpatient capabilities, scope of services, and medical staff education and structure.

Results: Sixty-five questionnaires were completed in full. Fifty-three tertiary medical centers from 14 countries were included in the study. In 86.8% of these institutions, the PED is separated from the adult emergency department; 91% have a pediatric intensive care unit, and 72% have an in-patient pediatric trauma service. Eighty-eight percent of the PEDs have incorporated triage protocols. Social service was not available in 17% of the departments. Sedation for painful procedures is provided by the staff in 77% of the PEDs. Only 24% of the PED medical directors have been formally trained in pediatric emergency medicine. In 17% of the departments, there is a 24-hour 7-day residents' coverage with no attending pediatrician or pediatric emergency medicine-trained physician.

Conclusions: According to this pilot study, the basic services provided by tertiary PEDs in Europe appear to be appropriate. Physicians training level and staffing may not be adequate to achieve optimal patient outcome.

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.