Pediatric Emergency Care

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > May 2004 - Volume 20 - Issue 5 > Utility of an Immunization Registry in a Pediatric Emergency...
Pediatric Emergency Care:
May 2004 - Volume 20 - Issue 5 - pp 297-301
Original Articles

Utility of an Immunization Registry in a Pediatric Emergency Department

Callahan, James M. MD; Reed, David MD; Meguid, Victoria MD; Wojcik, Susan MS, ATC; Reed, Katie MPA

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objectives: Determine prevalence of participation and underimmunization rate in a regional immunization registry (IR) among patients presenting to a university pediatric emergency department (PED). Rate of agreement between parental report and documented immunization status was also measured.

Methods: A convenience sample of parents of patients younger than 11 years registered in the PED were approached with a short questionnaire. When informed consent was obtained, the Central New York (CNY) IR was accessed via computer to see if the child was in the registry and to ascertain if their immunizations were up-to-date (UTD). Rate of agreement between parental report and immunization status documented in the IR was calculated.

Results: 698 (97%) of 720 patients consented to participate. Of these, 235 (34%, 95% CI, 30-37) were enrolled in the IR. Eighty-five (36%, 95% CI, 30-42) enrolled patients were under age 2. Sixty-seven (29%, 95% CI, 23-34) were from private group practices, 146 (62%, 95% CI, 56-68) were from university/community health center clinics and the source of primary care for 22 patients (9%) was unknown. Only 67 (29%, 95% CI, 23-34) parents of children in the IR were aware that they were enrolled. Of IR patients, 225 (96%, 95% CI, 93-98) stated they were UTD, while only 143 (61%, 95% CI, 55-67) were documented to be so.

Conclusions: A significant number of patients seen in the PED were in the CNY IR. More than one-half of the parents of enrolled children did not recall that they had previously registered their child. Only 61% of patients were UTD, whereas parents reported that almost all were. In the PED, use of an IR would create an opportunity for intervention in a large number of patients who were not UTD.

© 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.