Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 2013 - Volume 14 - Issue 8 > A Comparison of Quality Improvement Practices at Adult and P...
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182917a4c
Online Clinical Investigations

A Comparison of Quality Improvement Practices at Adult and Pediatric Trauma Centers*

Cooper, Carmen Gayle BSc1; Santana, Maria Jose MPharm, PhD2; Stelfox, Henry T. MD, PhD, FRCPC3

Supplemental Author Material
Collapse Box


Objectives: Quality assurance practices are structured performance improvement and patient safety processes designed to continuously monitor, evaluate, and improve the performance of a trauma program. These practices are integral in the provision of quality injury care, and yet no comprehensive description of existing quality improvement practices used by pediatric trauma centers is available. Therefore, we compared the quality improvement programs used in adult and pediatric trauma centers by performing a reanalysis of our recent survey of trauma quality improvement practices in Canada, United States, Australia, and New Zealand.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: Pediatric and adult trauma centers in United States, Canada, and Australasia.

Patients: None.

Interventions: None.

Measurements: We surveyed 184 trauma centers verified by professional trauma organizations in the United States, Canada, and Australasia regarding their quality improvement programs. Centers were classified according to population served (adult, adult and pediatric, or pediatric patients), and quality improvement programs were compared using descriptive statistics.

Results: Most of the trauma centers reported engagement in quality improvement activities. Adult centers devoted a larger percentage of their quality indicators to the measurement of safety (adult 50% vs adult and pediatric 53% vs pediatric 38%, p < 0.001), whereas pediatric centers placed a greater emphasis on the timeliness of care (20% vs 24% vs 30%, p < 0.001). Few centers used quality indicators to measure the patient-centered nature of care, long-term outcomes, or secondary injury prevention.

Conclusions: Opportunities for the improvement of pediatric quality improvement programs exist including a need to determine the optimal structure for trauma quality improvement, develop patient-centered quality indicators of injury care, measure long-term outcomes, and create measures of secondary injury prevention.

©2013The Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.