Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Defining pediatric sepsis by different criteria: Discrepancies in populations and implications for clinical practice

Weiss, Scott L. MD; Parker, Brandon MD; Bullock, Maria E. RN, MSN, CPNP-AC/PC; Swartz, Sheila BS; Price, Carolynn BS; Wainwright, Mark S. MD, PhD; Goodman, Denise M. MD, MS

Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: July 2012 - Volume 13 - Issue 4 - p e219–e226
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31823c98da
Online Clinical Investigations
SCCM Podcast

Objective: Pediatric patients with sepsis are identified using related but distinct criteria for clinical, research, and administrative purposes. The overlap between these criteria will affect the validity of extrapolating data across settings. We sought to quantify the extent of agreement among different criteria for pediatric severe sepsis/septic shock and to detect systematic differences between these cohorts.

Design: Observational cohort study.

Setting: Forty-two bed pediatric intensive care unit at an academic medical center.

Patients: A total of 1,729 patients ≤18 yrs-old.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and Main Results: All patients were screened for severe sepsis or septic shock using consensus guidelines (research criteria), diagnosis by healthcare professionals (clinical criteria), and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes (administrative criteria). Cohen’s κ determined the level of agreement among criteria, and patient characteristics were compared between cohorts. Ninety (5.2%) patients were identified by research, 96 (5.6%) by clinical, and 103 (6.0%) by administrative criteria. The κ ± standard error for pair-wise comparisons was 0.67 ± 0.04 for research-clinical, 0.52 ± 0.05 for research-administrative, and 0.55 ± 0.04 for clinical-administrative. Of the patients in the clinical cohort, 67% met research and 58% met administrative criteria. The research cohort exhibited a higher Pediatric Index of Mortality-2 score (median, interquartile range 5.2, 1.6-13.3) than the clinical (3.6, 1.1-6.2) and administrative (3.9, 1.0-6.0) cohorts (p = .005), an increased requirement for vasoactive infusions (74%, 57%, and 45%, p < .001), and a potential bias toward an increased proportion with respiratory dysfunction compared with clinical practice.

Conclusions: Although research, clinical, and administrative criteria yielded a similar incidence (5%-6%) for pediatric severe sepsis/septic shock, there was only a moderate level of agreement in the patients identified by different criteria. One third of patients diagnosed clinically with sepsis would not have been included in studies based on consensus guidelines or International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Differences in patient selection need to be considered when extrapolating data across settings.

From the Divisions of Critical Care (SLW, MEB, MSW, DMG), Medical Education (BP), and Neurology (MSW), Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Memorial Hospital, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine (SS, CP), Chicago, IL.

Listen to the Critical Care podcasts for an in-depth interview on this article. Visit www.sccm.org/iCriticalCare or search “SCCM” at iTunes.

Supported, in part, by the Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics at Children’s Memorial Hospital.

The authors have not disclosed any potential conflicts of interest.

For information regarding this article, E-mail: dgoodman@childrensmemorial.org

©2012The Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies